Bourbaki

Remark 2

Tag 009R, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 009R].

Algebra, VIII, p. 145, § 8. Semisimple Rings

Let ee and ff be idempotents in A. By Proposition 13, b), we have Ae=AfAe= Af if and and only if ef=eef=e and fe=ff e=f. Consequently, if the ring A is commutative, then the relation Ae=AfAe= Af is equivalent to e=fe=f. This does not hold in general, as shown by the example A=M2(Z),e=(1000)A =\mathbf{M}_2(\mathbf{Z}), e = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, and f=(1010)f = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}.

We say that idempotents ee and e′e' in the ring A are orthogonal if ee′=ee'= e′e=0e'e= 0. Let (ei)i∈I(e_i)_{i\in I} be a finite family of pairwise orthogonal idempotents in A. Since we have

(∑iei)2=∑iei2+∑i≠jeiej=∑iei (\sum_ie_i)^2=\sum_ie^2_i+\sum_{i\not=j}e_ie_j=\sum_ie_i

the element ∑i∈Iei\sum_{i\in I}e_i of A is idempotent.

A partition of an idempotent ee in A is a finite family (ei)i∈I(e_i)_{i\in I} of pairwise orthogonal idempotents in A such that e=∑i∈Ieie=\sum_{i\in I}e_i. We say that an idempotent ee in A is decomposable if there exists a partition of ee consisting of pairwise orthogonal idempotents distinct from 0 and ee; in the opposite case, we say that it is indecomposable. Observe that 0 is a decomposable idempotent.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.