Bourbaki

Lemma 6

Tag 018K, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 018K].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VIII, § 12. Chevalley orders

Let M be a free Z\mathbf{Z}-module of finite type, uu an endomorphism of M, and vv the endomorphism u⊗1u\otimes 1 of M⊗ZQM\otimes_{\mathbf{Z}}\mathbf{Q}. Assume that (nv)(M)⊂M(^v_n)(M)\subset M for all n∈Nn\in \mathbf{N}. Then uu is diagonalizable.

a) For any polynomial P∈Q[T]P\in \mathbf{Q}[T] such that P(Z)⊂ZP(\mathbf{Z})\subset \mathbf{Z}, we have P(v)(M)⊂MP(v)(M)\subset M (no. 4, Cor. of Prop. 2), so det P(v)∈ZP(v)\in \mathbf{Z}.

b) Denote by χv(t)=td+α1td−1+⋯\chi_v(t) =t^d+\alpha_1t^{d-1}+\cdots the characteristic polynomial of vv. Let k∈Z,n∈Nk\in \mathbf{Z}, n\in \mathbf{N}. Applying a) to the polynomial (nT−k)(^{T-k}_n), we see that the number

an=a_n= det (v−k)=1d(v-k)=1_d det(v−kv-k) det(v−k−1v-k-1)... .. det(v−k−n+1v-k-n+ 1)

n(nn(n!)

=(−1)n4χv(k)χv(k+1)...χv(k+n−1) =\frac{(-1)^n}{4}\chi_v(k)\chi_v(k+ 1). . . \chi_v(k+n-1)

(n(n!)

is an integer. Take k−1<−α1/dk-1<-\alpha_1/d. Then

χv(k+n−1)=nd+(α1+(k−1)d)nd−1+⋯ \chi_v(k+n-1) =n^d+ (\alpha_1+ (k-1)d)n^{d-1}+\cdots

and

∣an∣=∣χv(k+n−1)∣d∣an−1∣ |a_n|=\frac{|\chi_v(k + n- 1)|}{d}|a_{n-1}|
n n

hence, if an≠0a_n\not= 0 for all n∈Nn\in \mathbf{N}, the sequence of the ∣an∣|a_n| is strictly decreasing for nn sufficiently large, which is absurd. It follows that vv has an integer eigenvalue λ\lambda. Put M′=M'= Ker(u−λ.1u-\lambda .1) and M′′=M/M′M''= M/M'. Then M′M' is the intersection with M of a vector subspace of M⊗ZQM\otimes_{\mathbf{Z}}\mathbf{Q}, so the Z\mathbf{Z}-module M′′M'' is torsion-free of finite type, and consequently free of rank <d< d. Arguing by induction on dd and applying the induction hypothesis to the endomorphism of M′′M'' induced by uu, we conclude that all the eigenvalues of vv in an algebraically closed extension of Q\mathbf{Q} are integers.

c) We show that vv is diagonalizable. Let λ\lambda be an eigenvalue of vv and let x∈M⊗ZQx\in M\otimes_{\mathbf{Z}}\mathbf{Q} be such that (v−λ)2x=0(v-\lambda )^2x= 0. We have v(vx−λx)=λ(vx−λx)v(vx-\lambda x) =\lambda (vx-\lambda x), so

n1n1!(v−λ−n+1)(v−λ−n+2)...(v−λ−1)(v−λ)x(v-\lambda -n+ 1)(v-\lambda -n+ 2). . .(v-\lambda -1)(v-\lambda )x

=(−1)n−1n(vx−λx) =\frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n}(vx-\lambda x)

By a), this implies that vx−λx∈nMvx-\lambda x\in nM for all n∈Nn\in \mathbf{N}, so (v−λ)x=0(v-\lambda )x= 0.

d) Let λ\lambda be an eigenvalue of vv and let λ−a,λ+b\lambda -a, \lambda +b be an interval in Z\mathbf{Z} containing all the eigenvalues of vv. Consider the polynomial

(T−λ−1)(T−λ−2)...(T−λ−b) (T-\lambda -1)(T-\lambda -2). . .(T-\lambda -b)
P(T)=(−1)b P(T) = (-1)^b

bb!

(T−λ+1)(T−λ+2)...(T−λ+a) (T-\lambda + 1)(T-\lambda + 2). . .(T-\lambda +a)
× \times

aa!

We have P(Z)⊂Z,P(λ)=1,P(μ)=0P(\mathbf{Z})\subset \mathbf{Z},P(\lambda ) = 1,P(\mu) = 0 for μ∈Z∩(λ−a,λ+b)\mu\in \mathbf{Z}\cap (\lambda -a, \lambda +b) and μ≠λ\mu\not=\lambda. By a),P(v)(M)⊂Ma), P(v)(M)\subset M. By c),P(v)c), P(v) is a projection of M⊗ZQM\otimes_{\mathbf{Z}}\mathbf{Q} onto the eigenspace corresponding to λ\lambda. Q.E.D.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.