Bourbaki

Remark 2

Tag 018N, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 018N].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VIII, § 12. Chevalley orders

Let ρ\rho be the adjoint representation of g\mathfrak{g} on U(g)U(\mathfrak{g}). Let α,x,n,h\alpha , x, n, h be as in (ii) above. We have ρ(x(n)).U⊂U\rho (x^{(n)}).\mathscr{U}\subset \mathscr{U} by Lemma 2. On the other hand, if p∈Np\in \mathbf{N},

((h))(n)(((h))_{(n)}( ad h)(n)(nα(h))(n)h)_{(n)}(n\alpha (h))_{(n)}

ρx\rho x = xx = xx

ppp ppp

(no. 5, formula (13)), so ρ((ph)).U⊂U\rho ((^h_p)).\mathscr{U}\subset \mathscr{U}. This proves that U\mathscr{U} is an admissible lattice in U(g)U(\mathfrak{g}), and it follows that G\mathscr{G} is an admissible lattice in g\mathfrak{g} (for the adjoint representation).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.