Bourbaki

Definition 5

Tag 03JI, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03JI].

Theory of Sets, chapter III, § 1. Order relations. Ordered sets

Let EE be a preordered set and let XX be a subset of EE. Any element x∈Ex\in E such that x≤yx\leq y (resp. x≥yx\geq y) for all y∈Xy\in X is called a lower (resp. upper) bound of XX in EE.

Every upper bound of XX is a lower bound of XX with respect to the opposite ordering, and vice versa.

¶ If xx is a lower bound of XX, every element z≤xz\leq x is also a lower bound of XX. A lower bound of XX is also a lower bound of every subset of XX. An ordered set XX has a least element if and only if there exists a lower bound of XX which belongs to XX.

¶ The set of lower bounds of a subset XX of a preordered set EE may be empty : this is the case when X=EX=E and EE is an ordered set which has no least element.

¶ A subset XX of EE whose set of lower (resp. upper) bounds is not empty is said to be bounded below (resp. bounded above). A subset which is bounded both below and above is said to be bounded. If XX is bounded below (resp. bounded above, bounded), the same is true of every subset of XX.

Every subset consisting of a single element is bounded. But a subset consisting of two elements need not be bounded either above or below (no. 10).

Let EE be a preordered set and let ff be a mapping of an arbitrary set AA into EE. The mapping ff is said (by abuse of language) to be bounded below (resp. bounded above, bounded) if the set f(A)f(A) is bounded below (resp. bounded above, bounded) in EE.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2004, Springer. Not translated.