Bourbaki

Definition 6

Tag 03JJ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03JJ].

Theory of Sets, chapter III, § 1. Order relations. Ordered sets

Let EE be an ordered set and let XX be a subset of EE. An element of EE is said to be the greatest lower bound or infimum (resp. least upper bound or supremum) of XX in EE if it is the greatest (resp. least) element of the set of lower (resp. upper) bounds of XX in EE.

Given a subset XX of an ordered set EE, the least upper bound (resp. greatest lower bound) of XX in EE, when it exists, is denoted by

sup⁡EX(resp. inf⁡EX) \sup_E X\quad\text{(resp. }\inf_E X\text{)}

or by sup X (resp. inf X) if there is no risk of ambiguity. The least upper bound (resp. greatest lower bound) of a set {x,y}\{x, y\} of two elements, when it exists, is denoted by sup (x,y)(x, y) (resp. inf (x,y)(x, y)). Similarly for the least upper bound and greatest lower bound of a set of three elements, etc.

¶ If a subset X of E has a greatest element aa, then aa is the least upper bound of X in E.

¶ If X has a greatest lower bound aa in E, then aa is the least upper bound of X with respect to the opposite ordering on E. For this reason we may restrict ourselves for the most part, in what follows, to consideration of the properties of least upper bounds.

Examples

(1) The set of upper bounds of the empty set ∅\emptyset in an ordered set E is evidently E itself; hence ∅\emptyset has a supremum in E if and only if E has a least element, which is then the least upper bound of ∅\emptyset.

(2) In the set P(E)\mathfrak{P}(E) of subsets of a set E, ordered by inclusion, every subset S\mathfrak{S} of P(E)\mathfrak{P}(E) has a least upper bound, namely the union of the sets of S\mathfrak{S}, and a greatest lower bound, namely the intersection of the sets of S\mathfrak{S}.

(3) Let E, F be two sets and let Θ\Theta be a subset of the Φ(E,F)\Phi(E, F) of mappings of subsets of E into F, ordered by extension of mappings (no. 1, Example 3). For each u∈Φ(E,F)u \in \Phi(E, F) let D(u)D(u) be the domain of uu. The condition for the existence of a common extension of a family of mappings belonging to Φ(E,F)\Phi(E, F) (Chapter II, § 4, no. 6, Proposition 7) shows that Θ\Theta has a least upper bound in Φ(E,F)\Phi(E, F) if and only if for each pair (u,v)(u, v) of elements of Θ\Theta we have u(x)=v(x)u(x) = v(x) whenever x∈D(u)∩D(v)x \in D(u) \cap D(v).

A mapping ff of a set A into an ordered set E is said to have a least upper bound if the image f(A)f(A) has a least upper bound in E; this bound is then called the least upper bound of f and is written sup⁡x∈Af(x)\sup_{x \in A} f(x). Similarly for the greatest lower bound.

In particular, if a subset A of E has a least upper bound in E, this bound is the least upper bound of the canonical injection of A into E, and may therefore be written as sup⁡x∈Ax\sup_{x \in A} x.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2004, Springer. Not translated.