Example 2
Tag 03SL, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03SL].
Theory of Sets, chapter III, § 1. Order relations. Ordered sets
Let E be an ordered set. For each let be the set of all such that . The mapping is a strictly decreasing mapping of E into (ordered by inclusion); indeed, the relation is equivalent to .
An injective monotone mapping of an ordered set E into an ordered set F is strictly monotone; the converse is usually not true, because it may happen that when neither of the relations , is true (cf. no. 12, Proposition 11).
¶ A bijective mapping of an ordered set E onto an ordered set E' is an isomorphism of E onto E' (no. 3) if and only if both and its inverse mapping are increasing.
¶ If I is an ordered index set, a family of subsets of a set E is said to be increasing if is an increasing mapping of I into , ordered by inclusion (in other words, if implies ). Similarly we define a decreasing, strictly increasing, or strictly decreasing family of subsets .
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.