Bourbaki

3. Primary decomposition in graded modules

1. Prime ideals associated with a graded module

Proposition 1

Let AA be a torsion-free commutative group, AA a graded ring of type AA and MM a graded AA-module of type AA. Every prime ideal associated with MM is graded and is the annihilator of a homogeneous element of MM.

We know that AA can be given a total order structure compatible with its group structure (Algebra, Chapter II, § 11, no. 4, Lemma 2). Let pp be a prime ideal associated with MM, the annihilator of an element x∈Mx \in M, and let (xi)i∈Δ(x_i)_{i \in \Delta} be the family of homogeneous components of xx; let i(1)<i(2)<⋯<i(r)i(1) < i(2) < \cdots < i(r) be the values of ii for which xi≠0x_i \neq 0. Consider an element a∈pa \in p and let (ai)i∈Δ(a_i)_{i \in \Delta} be the family of its homogeneous components; we shall prove that a,∈pa, \in p for all i∈Ai \in A, which will show that pp is a graded ideal.

We argue by induction on the number of indices ii such that a,≠0a, \neq 0. Our assertion is obvious if this number is 0; if not, let mm be the greatest of the indices ii for which a,≠0a, \neq 0; if we prove that a,∈pa, \in p, the induction hypothesis applied to a−a,a - a, will give the conclusion. Now, ax=0ax = 0; for all j∈Aj \in A, using the fact that the homogeneous component of degree m+jm + j of axax is 0, we obtain

∑i∈Δam−ixj+i=0; \sum_{i \in \Delta} a_{m-i} x_{j+i} = 0;
we conclude that amxja_m x_j is a linear combination of the xix_i of indices i>ji > j. In particular therefore amxi(r)=0a_m x_{i(r)} = 0, whence, by descending induction on n<rn < r, amr−n+1xi(n)=0a_m^{r-n+1} x_{i(n)} = 0. Then amrx=0a_m^r x = 0, whence amr∈pa_m^r \in p and, as pp is prime, a,∈pa, \in p.

We now show that pp is the annihilator of a homogeneous element of MM. Let us write bn=Ann⁡(xi(n))b_n = \operatorname{Ann}(x_{i(n)}) for 1≤n≤r1 \leq n \leq r. For every homogeneous element bb of pp and all nn the homogeneous component of bxbx of degree i(n)+deg⁡(b)i(n) + \deg(b) is bxi(n)bx_{i(n)}, hence bxi(n)=0bx_{i(n)} = 0 and therefore b∈6b \in 6; as pp is generated by its homogeneous elements, p⊂6p \subset 6. On the other hand, clearly ⋂n=1r6n⊂Ann⁡(x)=p\bigcap_{n=1}^r 6_n \subset \operatorname{Ann}(x) = p; as pp is prime, there exists an nn such that bn⊂pb_n \subset p (Chapter 11, § 1, no. 1, Proposition 1), whence bn=P=Ann⁡(xi(n))b_n = P = \operatorname{Ann}(x_{i(n)}), which completes the proof.

Corollary

For every (necessarily graded) prime ideal pp associated with a graded AA-module MM, there exists an index k∈Ak \in A such that the graded AA-module (A/p)(k)(A/p)(k) obtained from the graded AA-module A/pA/p by diminishing the degrees by kk (Algebra, Chapter II, § 11, no. 2) is isomorphic to a graded submodule of MM.

With the notation of the proof of Proposition 1, consider the homomorphism obtained, by taking quotients, from the homomorphism a↦axi(n)a \mapsto ax_{i(n)} of AA to MM; the latter is a graded homomorphism of degree i(n)i(n) and hence it gives on taking quotients a graded bijective homomorphism of degree i(n)i(n) of A/pA/p onto a graded submodule of MM.

Proposition 2

Let AA be a torsion-free commutative group, AA a graded Noetherian ring of type AA and MM a graded finitely generated AA-module of type AA. There exists a composition series (Mi)0≤i≤n(\mathbf{M}_i)_{0 \leq i \leq n} consisting of graded submodules of MM such that for 0≤i≤n−10 \leq i \leq n - 1 the graded module Mi/Mi+1\mathbf{M}_i / \mathbf{M}_{i+1} is isomorphic to a shifted graded module (A/pi)(ki)(A/p_i)(k_i), where pip_i is a graded prime ideal of AA and ki∈Ak_i \in A.

It is sufficient to retrace the argument of § 1, no. 4, Theorem 1 taking on this occasion G\mathscr{G} to be the set of graded submodules of MM with a composition series with the properties of the statement; we conclude using the Corollary to Proposition 1.

2. Primary submodules corresponding to graded prime ideals

Proposition 3

Let AA be a torsion-free commutative group, AA a graded Noetherian ring of type AA, pp a graded ideal of AA and MM a graded AA-module of type AA not reduced to 00. Suppose that for every homogeneous element aa of pp the homothety of ratio aa on MM is almost nilpotent and that for every homogeneous element bb of A−pA - p the homothety of ratio bb on MM is injective. Then pp is prim and the submodule {0}\{0\} of MM is pp-primary.

It suffices to show that Ass⁡(M)={p}\operatorname{Ass}(M) = \{p\} (§ 2, no. 1, Proposition 1). Let qq be a prime ideal associated with MM; it is a graded ideal and it is the annihilator of a homogeneous element x≠0x \neq 0 of MM (no. 1, Proposition 1). For every homogeneous element aa of qq, ax=0ax = 0 and hence the homothety of ratio aa on MM is not injective, whence a∈pa \in p. Conversely, let bb be a homogeneous element of pp; there exists an integer n>0n > 0 such that bnx=0b^n x = 0, whence bn∈Ann⁡(x)=qb^n \in \operatorname{Ann}(x) = q and, as qq is prime, b∈qb \in q. As pp and qq are generated by their respective homogeneous element, p=qp = q, which proves that Ass⁡(M)⊂{p}\operatorname{Ass}(M) \subset \{p\}. As M≠{0},Ass⁡(M)#∅M \neq \{0\}, \operatorname{Ass}(M) \# \varnothing (§ 1, no. 1, Corollary 1 to Proposition 2), whence Ass⁡(M)={p}\operatorname{Ass}(M) = \{p\}.

Proposition 4

Let AA be a torsion-free commutative group, AA a graded Noetherian ring of type AA and MM a graded AA-module of type AA. Let pp be a prime ideal of AA and NN, a submodule of MM which is pp-primary with respect to MM.

(i) The largest graded ideal p′p' of AA contained in pp (Algebra, Chapter 11, § 11, no. 3) is prime.

(ii) The largest graded submodule N′N' of NN is p′p'-primary with respect to MM.

We know (loc. cit.) that the homogeneous elements of p′p' (resp. N′N') are just the homogeneous elements of pp (resp. NN). Let aa be a homogeneous element of pp; if xx is a homogeneous element of MM, there exists an integer n>0n > 0 such that anx∈Na^n x \in N; as anxa^n x is homogeneous, anx∈N′a^n x \in N'; as every y∈My \in M is the direct sum of a finite number of homogeneous elements, we conclude that there exists an integer q>0q > 0 such that aqy∈N′a^q y \in N', so that the homothety with ratio aa in M/N′M/N' is almost nilpotent.

Consider now a homogeneous element bb of A−p′A - p'; then b∉pb \notin p since bb is homogeneous. Let xx be an element of MM such that bx∈N′bx \in N' and let (xi)i∈Δ(x_i)_{i \in \Delta} be the family of homogeneous components of xx. As N′N' is graded, bxi∈N′bx_i \in N' for all ii, hence bxi∈Nbx_i \in N and, as b∉pb \notin p, we conclude that xi∈Nx_i \in N; as xix_i is homogeneous, xi∈N′x_i \in N', whence x∈N′x \in N' and the homothety with ratio bb on M/N′M/N' is injective. Proposition 4 then follows from Proposition 3 applied to p′p' and M/N′M/N'.

3. Primary decomposition in graded modules

Proposition 5

Let AA be a torsion-free commutative group, AA a graded Noetherian ring of type AA, MM a graded AA-module of type MM, NN a graded submodule of MM and N=⋂i∈IQiN = \bigcap_{i \in I} Q_i a primary decomposition of NN in MM.

(i) Let Qi′Q'_i be the largest graded submodule of MM contained in QiQ_i. Then the Qi′Q'_i are primary and N=⋂i∈IQi′N = \bigcap_{i \in I} Q'_i.

(ii) If the primary decomposition N=⋂i∈IQiN = \bigcap_{i \in I} Q_i is reduced, so is the primary decomposition N=⋂i∈IQi′N = \bigcap_{i \in I} Q'_i and for all i∈Ii \in I the prime ideals corresponding to QiQ_i and Qi′Q'_i are equal.

(iii) If QiQ_i corresponds to a prime ideal pip_i which is a minimal element of Ass⁡(M/N)\operatorname{Ass}(M/N), QiQ_i is a graded submodule of MM.

We have seen (no. 2, Proposition 4) that the Qi′Q'_i are primary with respect to MM and N⊂Q′′⊂QiN \subset Q'' \subset Q_i, which proves (i). Proposition 4 of no. 2 also shows that the prime ideal pi′p'_i corresponding to Qi′Q'_i is the largest graded ideal contained in the prime ideal pip_i corresponding to QiQ_i. If the decomposition N=⋂i∈IQiN = \bigcap_{i \in I} Q_i is reduced, pi∈Ass⁡(M/N)p_i \in \operatorname{Ass}(M/N) for all ii (§ 2, no. 3, Proposition 4), hence pip_i is a graded ideal (no. 1, Proposition 1) and therefore pi′=pip'_i = p_i; then Ass⁡(M/N)=⋃i∈I{pi′}\operatorname{Ass}(M/N) = \bigcup_{i \in I} \{p'_i\} (§ 2, no. 3, Proposition 4), which proves that the decomposition N=⋂i∈IQi′N = \bigcap_{i \in I} Q'_i is reduced (§ 2, no. 3, Proposition 4). Finally, if pip_i is a minimal element of Ass⁡(M/N)\operatorname{Ass}(M/N), then pi′=pip'_i = p_i since pip_i is graded (no. 1, Proposition 1), whence Qi′=QiQ'_i = Q_i by virtue of § 2, no. 3, Proposition 5.

Exercises

See the exercises for § 3.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.