§ 1. Prime fields. Characteristic
1. Prime fields
The field of fractions of the ring Z of rational integers is called the field of rational numbers and is denoted by Q (I, p. 117). For every prime number p the quotient ring is a finite field of p elements, denoted by in the sequel. The field Q is infinite since it contains Z, and is therefore not isomorphic to any field . If p and are distinct prime numbers, the fields and have distinct cardinals and so are not isomorphic.
Definition 1
A field is said to be prime if it is isomorphic either to Q or to one of the fields .
Every subfield of Q contains the ring Z and hence the field of fractions Q of Z; every subring of is necessarily equal to . Therefore every subfield of a prime field is necessarily equal to it (cf. Cor. 2 of Th. 1 below). Let P be a prime field and A a ring; if f and are two homomorphisms of P into A, then the set of such that is a subfield of P, hence by what has been said we must have . In particular, the only endomorphism of a prime field is the identity mapping.
By abuse of language one says that a ring or field is finite if its underlying set is finite.
Theorem 1
— Let be a ring ; suppose that there exists a subfield of . Then has a unique subfield which is a prime field. Moreover, is contained in the centre of and in every subfield of .
Let be a subfield of , the centre of , and put ; then is a subfield of . Let be the unique homomorphism of into and its kernel. Every subring of , in particular , contains ; hence the ideal is prime (I, p. 116-117). If , the homomorphism of into is injective; hence it extends (I, p. 116) to an isomorphism of onto a subfield of . If , there is a strictly positive integer such that (I, p. 111); if we had with and , this would mean and in contradiction with the fact that is prime. The number is therefore prime and by passage to quotients defines an isomorphism of onto a subfield of . In both cases is a subfield of contained in the centre of , and it is a prime field. Let be a subfield of ; then is a subfield of , and since is prime, we have , whence . If is a subfield of and is a prime field, then by what has been said, , whence because is a prime field.
Corollary 1
— Let be a field. There exists a unique subfield of which is a prime field, and this is the least subfield of .
Corollary 2
— For a field to be prime it is necessary and sufficient that it should contain no subfield other than itself.
2. Characteristic of a ring and of a field
We shall define the characteristic of a ring only when has a subfield. When this is so, let be the unique ring homomorphism of into , and let be the unique positive integer generating the ideal of which is the kernel of (I, p. 111); then the integer is called the characteristic of .
Let be a ring for which the characteristic is defined; then does not reduce to 0. By Th. 1 there exists a unique subfield of which is a prime field; we shall call it the prime subfield of . By the proof of Th. 1 there are the following two possibilities: a) the characteristic of is 0, is isomorphic to , b) the characteristic of is a prime number , is isomorphic to .
If the characteristic of is zero, there exists a unique ring homomorphism of into ; its image is the prime subfield of , contained in the centre of . Therefore there exists a unique -algebra structure of compatible with the ring structure. When the characteristic of is a prime number , we have the corresponding properties on replacing the field by the field .
Proposition 1
— Let be a ring not reduced to 0. a) For to be of characteristic 0 it is necessary and sufficient that the mapping of into itself should be bijective, for every integer
b) Let be a prime number. For to be of characteristic it is necessary and sufficient that for all .
Let be the unique homomorphism of into ; we have for every integer and every in . For to be of characteristic 0, it is necessary and sufficient that should extend to a homomorphism of into , that is, should be invertible in for every (I, p. 113); this proves . Similarly for to be of characteristic it is necessary and sufficient that should annihilate , that is, , or also that for all ; this proves .
Let us take for a not necessarily commutative field. The centre of is a (commutative) field; therefore the characteristic and the prime subfield of are defined.
Remark 1
Let and be two rings not reduced to 0. Suppose that the characteristic of is defined and that there is a homomorphism of into . The image under of the prime subfield of is a subfield of , isomorphic to , and hence prime. It follows that the characteristic of is defined and is equal to that of . If and are of characteristic 0 (resp. ), the mapping is a homomorphism of algebras over (resp. ).
Remark 2
Remark 1 shows that if is a ring of characteristic 0 (resp. ), the same holds of any ring containing as subring, or of any quotient of by a two-sided ideal . In particular, if is a field, every subfield of and every extension field of have the same characteristic as .
Remark 3
Let be an algebra not reduced to 0 over a field . Since the mapping of into is a ring homomorphism, Remark 1 shows that the characteristic of is defined and equal to that of .
Remark 4
Since the field is infinite, every ring of characteristic 0 is infinite; it follows that every finite field has non-zero characteristic.
Remark 5
Let be a ring not reduced to 0, whose additive group is a torsion-free -module, and put . The mapping of into is injective (II, p. 314), hence is isomorphic to a subring of a ring of characteristic 0.
3. Commutative rings of characteristic p
In this No. and the following one denotes a prime number.
Theorem 2
— Let be a commutative ring of characteristic . The mapping is an endomorphism of the ring , that is, we have the relations
(1)
for in .
Formula (2) follows from the commutativity of . To prove (1) we use the binomial formula ; since for all , it suffices to prove the following lemma:
Lemma 1
Let be a prime number and an integer in the range from 1 to , then the binomial coefficient is an integer divisible by .
We argue by induction on , the case being immediate from the formula . Suppose that and that is divisible by . Then the integer belongs to the prime ideal of ; since , we have and the lemma follows.
Let be a commutative ring of characteristic and an integer . From Th. 2 we deduce by induction on that the mapping is an endomorphism of the ring . In particular we have the relation
for any in . The mapping is sometimes called the Frobenius endomorphism of . Taking and , we obtain from (3) the relation:
For each subset of we denote by the set of elements of of the form with ^1. In particular, if is a subring of , the set is a subring of . If is a subring of and a subset of we denote by the subring of generated by ; when is a field, we denote by the field of fractions of , that is, the subfield of generated by .
Proposition 2
— *Let be a commutative ring of characteristic , a subring of , a subset of and a positive integer.
a) We have , and if is a field, .
b) If the -module is generated by the family of elements of , then the -module is generated by the family
Since is the subring of generated by , its image under the endomorphism of the ring is the subring of generated by the image of under , whence . The case of fields is treated similarly; this proves a).
It is clear that the family generates the -module . The -module is generated by products of the form with arbitrary in , hence also by the set . Assertion b) follows directly from this.
^1 Of course the set should not be confused with the set product of sets equal to , nor with the set of products of elements belonging to .
4. Perfect rings of characteristic p
Definition 2
— A ring of characteristic is said to be perfect if it is commutative and the mapping is bijective.
If the ring is perfect of characteristic , the mapping is an automorphism of the ring for every integer ; the inverse automorphism is denoted by or and the image of a subset of under this automorphism is written or . It is clear that for all and any integers and (of whatever sign).
Let be a commutative ring of characteristic . For every integer let us write for the kernel of the endomorphism of the ring . Then is an increasing sequence of ideals of ; since every positive integer is majorized by a power of , the ideal consists of all the nilpotent elements of . In particular, if is perfect, every nilpotent element of is zero.
Definition 3
— Let be a commutative ring of characteristic . By a perfect closure of we understand a pair where is a perfect ring of characteristic and is a homomorphism of into satisfying the following universal property:
(PC) If B is a perfect ring of characteristic p and v is a homomorphism of A into B, then there exists a unique homomorphism h of A into B such that .
The universal property (PC) implies at once the uniqueness of the perfect closure, in the following sense : if and are two perfect closures of , then there exists a unique isomorphism of onto such that (cf. E, IV, p. 23). We shall now establish the existence of the perfect closure :
Theorem 3
— Let be a commutative ring of characteristic . There exists a perfect closure of . Moreover, the kernel of is the set of all nilpotent elements of and for each there exists an integer such that .
For each integer , put ; when we define a homomorphism of into by . We thus obtain a direct system of rings (I, p. 120); let be the direct limit of this system and the canonical homomorphism of into ; we also put . By construction of the direct limit the kernel of is the union of the kernels of the homomorphisms π_{n,0}: a \mapsto a^{p^n} of into , thus it consists of all the nilpotent elements of . The ring is commutative of characteristic by Remark 1 of V, p. 3.
The ring is the union of the ascending sequence of subrings. We have ; hence for each there exists an integer such that . We also have , whence . Let be such that ; choose an integer and an element such that . Then we have ; by definition of the direct limit there exists an integer such that , that is, . We thus have , whence , that is, . Therefore the ring is perfect of characteristic .
Let be a homomorphism of into a perfect ring of characteristic . For every integer , the mapping is an automorphism of and so there exists a homomorphism of into characterized by . We then have for ; by definition of the direct limit there exists a homomorphism of into such that , for all ; in particular we have . Finally let be a homomorphism of into such that . Let ; as we have seen, there exist an integer and an element such that . Then we have
and since is perfect, we find . Thus we have , and this completes the proof that is a perfect closure of .
Proposition 3
— *Let be a perfect ring of characteristic and a subring of . Write and denote by the canonical injection of in . Then is the smallest perfect subring of containing and is a perfect closure of .
For each integer denote by the automorphism of . The sequence of subrings of (for ) is ascending and its union is thus a subring of . We have , hence is a perfect subring of . Finally let be a perfect subring of containing ; for every integer we have , whence .
If is a homomorphism of into a perfect ring of characteristic , then for every integer we can define a homomorphism of into by for all . We see at once that agrees with on ; thus there exists a homomorphism of into which induces on for all and in particular, extends . If is another extension of to a homomorphism of into B, the equality may be established as in the proof of Th. 3.
5. Characteristic exponent of a field. Perfect fields
Let be a field. By the characteristic exponent of we understand the integer equal to 1 if is of characteristic 0, and equal to the characteristic of when this is non-zero.
Proposition 4
— Let be a field of characteristic exponent q. For every integer the mapping is an isomorphism of K on one of its subfields (denoted by ). This follows from Th. 2 when q ≠ 1 and is trivial when q = 1. Likewise one can extend Prop. 2 to the case where is a field of characteristic exponent q, the case q = 1 being trivial.
Definition 4
— A field K of characteristic exponent q is said to be perfect if we have . When , K is called imperfect. By this definition a field is perfect if it is of characteristic 0, or if it is a perfect ring of characteristic in the sense of Def. 2. If is a field of characteristic and is a perfect closure of , then K is a field by Prop. 3 (V, p. 6) and is an isomorphism of K onto a subfield of . Frequently one identifies with its image under in , so that we have (Prop. 3). Let K be a field of characteristic 0 ; the characteristic exponent of is then 1. By convention the notation and is taken to mean x and S respectively (for an element of and a subset S of ). In particular we put and we agree to take the perfect closure of to be .
Proposition 5
— If K is a field of characteristic 0, or is finite, \ or algebraically closed \*, it is perfect. In particular every prime field is perfect.* Suppose that has characteristic . If is finite, then the subfield of has the same cardinal as , whence . \* If is algebraically closed, the polynomial has a root in for each (V, p. 20, Def. 1) whence and so . \* Finally a prime field is of characteristic 0 or finite. Let be a field of characteristic and the field of rational fractions in an indeterminate over . Then is imperfect, for there exists no element of (u, v polynomials in ) such that . This may be seen by writing this relation in the form and comparing the degrees of the two sides.
6. Characterization of polynomials with zero differential
Proposition 6
— *Let K be a commutative ring, A the polynomial algebra , and S the set of elements F of A such that .
a) If K is a ring of characteristic 0, then S = K. b) If K is a ring of characteristic , then ; if moreover K is perfect, then .
The mapping of A into the module of K-differentials of A is K-linear and satisfies the relation
(III, p. 569). Therefore S is a subalgebra.
When K is of characteristic , put ; we thus have if K is perfect (, p. 4, Prop. 2); moreover, we have for all , hence the subalgebra S of A contains T. If K is of characteristic 0, we put , and still find that . It remains to show that S is contained in T.
For every finite subset J of I let be the subalgebra of A generated by the family . We have and ; so it suffices to prove the relation , which we shall accomplish by induction on the cardinal of J. Thus let J be a finite subset of I such that , let i be an element of and . Every element F of A may be written in just one way in the form
with for all , and then
Suppose that F belongs to S; the family is a basis of the A-module (III, p. 570) and is a linear combination of the differentials for because . By (6) we then have and for each integer . By the induction hypothesis for all , since .
a) If K is of characteristic 0, we have for all , whence by Prop. 1 (, p. 2); so we have , whence .
b) If K is of characteristic , then A is an algebra over the field and the relation implies for every integer not divisible by . So we have , whence
Remark
— We still have when the additive group of K is torsion-free; this follows from the above proof or from Remark 5 of V, p. 3.
Corollary
— Let K be a field and F(X) a polynomial with coefficients in K, whose derivative F'(X) is zero. a) If K is of characteristic 0, then F ∈ K. b) If K is of characteristic p ≠ 0, there exists a polynomial G(X) such that F(X) = G(X^p). For we have dF = F . dX = 0.
Exercises
See the exercises for § 1.