1. Open sets, neighbourhoods, closed sets
1. Open sets
Definition 1
A topological structure* (or, more briefly, a topology) on a set is a structure given by a set of subsets of , having the following properties (called axioms of topological structures):
(O_I) Every union of sets of is a set of .
(O_{II}) Every finite intersection of sets of is a set of .
The sets of are called open sets of the topological structure defined by on .
Definition 2
A topological space is a set endowed with a topological structure*.
The elements of a topological space are often called points. When a topology has been defined on a set , this set is said to be the set underlying the topological space .
Axiom (O_I) implies in particular that the union of the empty subset of , i.e. the empty set belongs to . Axiom (O_{II}) implies that the intersection of the empty subset of , i.e. the set , belongs to .
To show that a set of subsets of satisfies (O_{II}), it is often convenient to prove separately that it satisfies the following two axioms, whose conjunction is equivalent to (O_{II}): (O_{II\ a}) The intersection of two sets of belongs to . (O_{II\ b}) belongs to .
Examples of topologies. Given any set , the set of subsets of consisting of and satisfies axioms and and therefore defines a topology on . So does the set of all subsets of : the topology it defines is the discrete topology on , and the set with this topology is called a discrete space.
A covering of a subset of a topological space is said to be open if all the are open in .
Definition 3
A homeomorphism of a topological space onto a topological space is an isomorphism of the topological structure of onto that of ;* that is to say, in accordance with the general definitions a bijection of onto which transforms the set of open subsets of into the set of open subsets of .
and are said to be homeomorphic if there is a homeomorphism of onto .
Example
If and are two discrete spaces, any bijection of onto is a homeomorphism.
The following criterion follows immediately from the definition of a homeomorphism: for a bijection of a topological space onto a topological space to be a homeomorphism, it is necessary and sufficient that the image under of each open set in is an open set in , and that the inverse image under of each open set in is an open set in .
2. Neighbourhoods
Definition 4
Let be a topological space and any subset of . A neighbourhood of is any subset of which contains an open set containing . The neighbourhoods of a subset consisting of a single point are also called neighbourhoods of the point *.
It is clear that every neighbourhood of a subset of is also a neighbourhood of each subset ; in particular, it is a neighbourhood of each point of . Conversely, suppose is a neighbourhood of each of the points of a set , and let be the union of the open sets contained in ; then , and since each point of belongs to an open set contained in , we have ; but is open by virtue of , hence is a neighbourhood of . In particular:
Proposition 1
A set is a neighbourhood of each of its points if and only if it is open.
The everyday sense of the word "neighbourhood" is such that many of the properties which involve the mathematical idea of neighbourhood appear as the mathematical expression of intuitive properties; the choice of this term thus has the advantage of making the language more expressive. For this purpose it is also permissible to use the expressions "sufficiently near" and "as near as we please" in some statements. For example, Proposition 1 can be stated in the following form: a set is open if and only if, for each , all the points sufficiently near belong to . More generally, we shall say that a property holds for all points sufficiently near a point , if it holds at all points of some neighbourhood of .
Let us denote by the set of all neighbourhoods of . The sets have the following properties:
(V_I) Every subset of which contains a set belonging to itself belongs to .
(V_{II}) Every finite intersection of sets of belongs to .
(V_{III}) The element is in every set of .
Indeed, these three properties are immediate consequences of Definition 4 and axiom (O_{II}).
(V_{IV}) If belongs to , then there is a set belonging to such that, for each , belongs to .
By Proposition 1, we may take to be any open set which contains and is contained in .
This property may be expressed in the form that a neighbourhood of is also a neighbourhood of all points sufficiently near to .
These four properties of the sets are characteristic. To be precise, we have:
Proposition 2
If to each element of a set there corresponds a set of subsets of such that the properties (V_I), (V_{II}), (V_{III}) and (V_{IV}) are satisfied, then there is a unique topological structure on such that, for each , is the set of neighbourhoods of in this topology.
By Proposition 1, if there is a topology on satisfying these conditions, the set of open sets for this topology is necessarily the set of subsets of such that for each we have ; hence the uniqueness of this topology if it exists.
The set certainly satisfies axioms (O_I) and (O_{II}): for (O_I), this follows immediately from (V_I), and for (O_{II}), from (V_{II}). It
!Diagram showing sets V, U, W, and points x, y, z
Figure 1.
remains to show that, in the topology defined by , is the set of neighbourhoods of for each . It follows from (V_I) that every neighbourhood of belongs to . Conversely, let be a set belonging to , and let be the set of points such that ; if we can show that and , then the proof will be complete. We have since ; also , for every point belongs to by reason of (V_III) and the hypothesis . It remains to show that , i.e. that for each ; now (Fig. 1) if then by (V_IV) there is a set such that for each we have ; since means that , it follows that , and therefore, by (V_I), that .
Q.E.D.
Proposition 2 shows that a topology on can be defined by means of the sets of neighbourhoods of points of , subject only to the axioms (V_I), (V_II), (V_III) and (V_IV).
Example
We may define a topology on the set of rational numbers by taking for open sets all unions of bounded open intervals; the set of these subsets certainly satisfies (O_I), and to see that it satisfies (O_II) it is enough to remark that if the intersection of two open intervals and is not empty, then it is the interval , where and . We get the same topology by defining for each the set of neighbourhoods of to be the set of subsets containing an open interval to which belongs. The topological space obtained by assigning this topology to is called the rational line (cf. Chapter IV, § 1, no. 2). Notice that in this space every open interval is an open set. \* We can define a topology on the set of real numbers in the same way; with this topology is called the real line (cf. § 2, Exercise 5 and Chapter IV, § 1, no. 3). \
3. Fundamental systems of neighbourhoods; bases of a topology
Definition 5
In a topological space , a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of a point (resp. of a subset of ) is any set of neighbourhoods of (resp. ) such that for each neighbourhood of (resp. ) there is a neighbourhood such that .
If is a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of a subset of , then every finite intersection of sets of contains a set of .
Examples. 1) In a discrete space (no. 1) the set alone constitutes a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of the point . 2) On the rational line the set of all open intervals containing a point is a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of this point. So is the set of open intervals , and the set of closed intervals , where runs through all the integers , or through any infinite strictly increasing sequence of integers . \* There are analogous results for the real line. \*
Definition 6
A base of the topology of a topological space is any set of open subsets of such that every open subset of is the union of sets belonging to .
Proposition 3
If is a topological space, then for a set of open subsets of to be a base of the topology of it is necessary and sufficient that for each the set of such that is a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of .
It is clear that the condition is necessary. Conversely, if it is satisfied, then given any open set and any there is an open set such that . The union of the sets for is therefore equal to . This completes the proof.
Example 1
The discrete topology has as a base the set of subsets of which consist of a single point.
Example 2
The set of bounded open intervals is by definition a base of the topology of the rational line (no. 2). \* Likewise, the set of bounded open intervals is a base of the topology of the real line. \
4. Closed sets
Definition 7
In a topological space , the complements of the open sets of are called closed sets.
Taking complements, we find that the axioms and take the following form:
Every intersection of closed sets is a closed set.
Every finite union of closed sets is a closed set.
The empty set and the whole space are closed (and therefore both open and closed; cf. § 11).
On the rational line, every interval of the form is a closed set, for its complement ]\leftarrow, a[ is open; likewise, every interval of the form ]\leftarrow, a] is a closed set; hence so is every bounded closed interval , since it is the intersection of the intervals and ]\leftarrow, b].
The set of rational integers is closed in the rational line, since its complement is open.
A covering of a subset of a topological space is said to be closed if each of the is closed in .
A homeomorphism of a topological space onto a topological space (no. 1) can be characterized as a bijection of onto such that the image under of every closed subset of is a closed subset of and the inverse image under of every closed subset of is a closed subset of .
5. Locally finite families
Definition 8
A family of subsets of a topological space is said to be locally finite if for each there is a neighbourhood of such that for all but a finite number of indices . A set of subsets of is said to be locally finite if the family of subsets defined by the identity map of onto itself is locally finite.
It is clear that if is a locally finite family of subsets and if for each , then the family is locally finite.
Every finite family of subsets of a topological space is obviously locally finite; the converse is not true in general.
\* For example, in , the open covering formed by the interval ]\leftarrow, 1[ and the intervals ] for each integer is locally finite; and each interval ] meets an infinite number of sets of this covering. \*
Proposition 4
The union of a locally finite family of closed subsets of a topological space is closed in .
Let be a locally finite family of closed subsets of , and suppose that does not belong to ; then has a neighbourhood which meets only those whose indices belong to a finite subset of . For each let be the complement of ; then contains the set , which is a neighbourhood of since each is open and contains . Hence, by Proposition 1 of no. 2, is open and therefore is closed in .
We note that the union of an arbitrary family of closed subsets of is not necessarily closed; for example, on the rational line , the set is the union of the closed sets
6. Interior, closure, frontier of a set; dense sets
Definition 9
In a topological space , a point is said to be an interior point of a subset of if is a neighbourhood of . The set of interior points of is called the interior of and is denoted by .
According to Definitions 9 and 4, a point is an interior point of if there is an open set contained in which contains ; it follows that is the union of all the open sets contained in , and hence is the largest open set contained in : in other words, if is an open set contained in , then . Consequently, if and are two subsets of such that , then ; and is a neighbourhood of if and only if .
Remark
The interior of a non-empty set can be empty; this is the case for a set consisting of a single point which is not open, for example on the rational line \* (or the real line) *.
Proposition 1 of no. 2 can be restated as follows:
A set is open if and only if it coincides with its interior.
The property of no. 2 implies that every point which is an interior point of each of two subsets and is an interior point of ; consequently
Every point which is interior to the complement of a set is said to be an exterior point of , and the set of these points is called the exterior of in ; a point which is an exterior point of is therefore characterized by the property that has a neighbourhood which does not meet .
Definition 10
The closure of a subset* of a topological space is the set of all points such that every neighbourhood of meets , and is denoted by .
This definition can be reformulated by saying that a point lies in the closure of a set if there are points of as near as we please to.
Every point which is not in the closure of is exterior to , and conversely; thus we have the formulae (which are duals of each other)
Hence, to any proposition on interiors of sets, there corresponds by duality a proposition on closures, and vice versa. In particular, the closure of a set is the smallest closed set which contains ; in other words, if is a closed set such that , then . If and are two subsets of such that , then .
A set is closed if and only if it coincides with its closure.
The dual of formula (1) is
Proposition 5
Let* be an open set in ; then for every subset of *we have
For suppose ; then if is any neighbourhood of , is a neighbourhood of , since is open; hence is not empty and therefore lies in the closure of .
If lies in the closure of but not in , then every neighbourhood of contains a point of other than ; but if it can happen that has a neighbourhood which contains no point of except . We say then that is an isolated point of . In particular, is isolated in the whole space if and only if is an open set.
A closed set which has no isolated points is called a perfect set.
Definition 11
In a topological space , a point is said to be a frontier point of a set if lies in the closure of and in the closure of . The set of frontier points of is called the frontier of .
The frontier of is therefore the set , which is closed. A frontier point of is characterized by the property that every neighbourhood of contains at least one point of and at least one point of ; may or may not belong to . The frontier of is the same as the frontier of . The interior of , the exterior of and the frontier of are mutually disjoint and their union is the whole space .
Definition 12
A subset of a topological space is said to be dense in (or simply dense, if there is no ambiguity about ) if , i.e. if every non-empty open set of meets .
Example
\* We shall see in Chapter IV, § 1 that the set of rational numbers and its complement are dense on the real line. \* In a discrete space the only dense subset of is itself. On the other hand, every non-empty subset of is dense in the topology on for which the only open sets are and .
Proposition 6
If is a base of the topology of a topological space , there is a dense set in such that .
We may restrict ourselves to the case in which none of the sets of is empty (the non-empty sets of already form a base of the topology of ). For each , let be a point of ; it follows from Proposition 3 of no. 3 that the set of the points is dense in , and we have (Set Theory, Chapter III, § 3, no. 2, Proposition 3).
Exercises
See the exercises for § 1.