2. Continuous functions
1. Continuous functions
Definition 1
A mapping of a topological space into a topological space is said to be continuous at a point if, given any neighbourhood of in , there is a neighbourhood of in such that the relation implies .
Definition 1 may be restated in the following more intuitive form: to say that is continuous at the point means that is as near as we please to whenever is sufficiently near .
The relation "for each " is equivalent to or again to ; in view of the neighbourhood axiom (), we see that Definition 1 is equivalent to the following: is said to be continuous at the point if, for each neighbourhood of in , is a neighbourhood of in . Moreover, it is sufficient that is a neighbourhood of for each neighbourhood belonging to a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of in (, no. 3).
Proposition 1
Let be a mapping of a topological space into a topological space . If is continuous at , and if lies in the closure of a subset of , then lies in the closure of .
Let be a neighbourhood of in . Since is continuous at , is a neighbourhood of in . Hence meets , from which it follows that meets , and therefore is in the closure of .
Proposition 2
Let be three topological spaces; let be a mapping of into , continuous at ; let be a mapping of into , continuous at . Then the composition is continuous at .
Let be a neighbourhood of in . Since is continuous at it follows that is a neighbourhood of in . But is continuous at , hence is a neighbourhood of in , and therefore is continuous at .
Definition 2
A mapping of a topological space into a topological space is said to be continuous on (or just continuous) if it is continuous at each point of .
Example 1
The identity mapping of a topological space onto itself is continuous.
Example 2
A constant map of a topological space into a topological space is continuous.
Example 3
Every mapping of a discrete space into a topological space is continuous.
Theorem 1
Let be a mapping of a topological space into a topological space . Then the following statements are equivalent:
a) is continuous in .
b) For every subset of , .
c) The inverse image under of every closed subset of is a closed subset of .
d) The inverse image under of every open subset of is an open subset of .
We have already seen that a) implies b) (Proposition 1). To show that b) implies c), let be a closed subset of and let ; then by hypothesis , hence , so that and is closed. By virtue of the relation for every subset of , c) implies d). Finally, suppose that d) is satisfied. Let be any point of and let be any neighbourhood of in ; then there is an open set in for which
and hence . By hypothesis, is open in , so that is a neighbourhood of in . Thus d) implies a).
Remarks. 1) Let be a base (§ 1, no. 3) of the topology of ; then for to be continuous, it is necessary and sufficient that is open in for every .
Example
Let be any rational number. The mapping of the rational line into itself is continuous on , for the inverse image under this mapping of an open interval is the open interval
Likewise, the mapping is continuous on ; this is clear if , for then for all ; if then the inverse image under this mapping of the open interval is the open interval with end-points and .
2) The direct image of an open (resp. closed) set of under a continuous mapping is not necessarily open (resp. closed) in (cf. § 5).
Example
\* The mapping of into itself is continuous, but is the half-open interval , which is neither open nor closed in . \
Theorem 2
1) If and are two continuous mappings, then is continuous.
2) For a bijection of a topological space onto a topological space to be a homeomorphism, it is necessary and sufficient that and the inverse of are continuous (or, as is also said, that is bicontinuous).
The first assertion is an immediate consequence of Proposition 2; the second follows from Theorem 1, d) and the definition of a homeomorphism (§ 1, no. 1).
Remark 1
It is possible to have a continuous bijection of a topological space onto a topological space which is not bicontinuous: for example, take to be the rational line , and to be the set with the discrete topology; then the identity map is continuous but is not a homeomorphism.
Remark 2
To verify that a continuous bijection is a homeomorphism, it is enough to show that for each and each neighbourhood of , is a neighbourhood of in .
Remark 3
Let be a topological space, and for each let be the set of all neighbourhoods of . Let be a point of ; for each , define a set of subsets of as follows: , and if then is to be the set of all subsets of which contain . It is immediately verified (§ 1, no. 2, Proposition 2) that the sets are sets of neighbourhoods of points of for a topology on ; let denote the topological space thus obtained, and let denote the identity map, which is continuous but not in general bicontinuous. A mapping of into a topological space is continuous at the point if and only if the composition is continuous on ; this follows immediately from the definitions.
2. Comparison of topologies
Theorem 2 of no. 1 shows that we may take the continuous mappings as morphisms of topological structures (Set Theory, Chapter IV, § 2, no. 1); from now on, we shall assume that we have made this choice of morphisms. In accordance with the general definitions (Set Theory, Chapter IV, § 2, no. 2), this allows us to define an ordering on the set of topologies on a given set :
Definition 3
Given two topologies on the same set , we say that is finer than (and that is coarser than ) if, denoting by the set with the topology (), the identity mapping is continuous. If in addition , we say that is strictly finer than (and that is strictly coarser than ).
Two topologies, one of which is finer than the other, are said to be comparable.
The criteria for a mapping to be continuous (no. 1, Definition 1 and Theorem 1) give the following proposition:
Proposition 3
Given two topologies on a set , the following statements are equivalent: a) is finer than . b) For each , each neighbourhood of for is a neighbourhood of for . c) For each subset of , the closure of in the topology is contained in the closure of in the topology . d) Every subset of which is closed in is closed in . e) Every subset of which is open in is open in .
Example
\* In Hilbert space consisting of sequences of real numbers such that
Remark 1
In the ordered set of all topologies on a set , the topology in which the only open sets are and is the coarsest and the discrete topology is the finest.
Remark 2
The finer the topology, the more open sets, closed sets and neighbourhoods; the finer the topology, the smaller (resp. the larger) the closure (resp. the interior) of a set; the finer the topology, the fewer dense sets.
Remark 3
If is a continuous mapping, it remains continuous if the topology of is replaced by a finer topology and the topology of is replaced by a coarser topology (no. 1, Theorem 2). In other words, the finer the topology of and the coarser the topology of , the more continuous mappings there are of into .
3. Initial topologies
Proposition 4
Let be a set, let be a family of topological spaces, and for each let be a mapping of into . Let be the set of subsets of of the form (, open in ), and let be the set of finite intersections of sets of . Then is a base of a topology on which is the initial topological structure on for the family (Set Theory, Chapter IV, § 2, no. 3) and in particular is the coarsest topology on for which the mappings are continuous. More precisely, if is a mapping of a topological space into , then is continuous at a point (X carrying the topology ) if and only if each of the functions is continuous at .
Let be the set of all unions of sets belonging to ; clearly satisfies axiom since formation of unions is associative; and satisfies axiom by reason of the definition of and the fact that finite intersection is distributive over arbitrary union [Set Theory, R § 4, formula (37)]. The set is therefore the set of open subsets of for a topology of which is a base. We shall prove the last assertion of the proposition, which implies the others by reason of the general properties of initial structures (Set Theory, Chapter IV, § 2, no. 3, criterion CST 9). In the first place, the definition of shows that the are continuous on (no. 1, Theorem 1); hence, if is continuous at , so are the mappings (no. 1, Proposition 2). Conversely, suppose that all the mappings are continuous at , and let be a neighbourhood of in ; by definition, there is a finite subset of , and for each an open subset of such that contains the set and belongs to this set. It follows that
Let be a base of the topology of ; let denote the set of subsets of of the form for and for each ; if is the set of finite intersections of sets of , it is evident that is a base of the topology .
The general properties of initial structures (Set Theory, Chapter IV, § 2, no. 3, criterion CST 10) imply in particular the following transitivity property (the direct proof of which is quite straightforward):
Proposition 5
Let be a set, a family of topological spaces, a partition of and a family of sets indexed by . Also for each let be a mapping of into ; for each and each let be a mapping of into , and put . If each carries the coarsest topology for which the mappings are continuous, then the coarsest topology on for which the are continuous is the same as the coarsest topology for which the are continuous.
Example 1
Inverse image of a topology. Let be a set, a topological space, a mapping of into ; the coarsest topology on for which is continuous is called the inverse image under of the topology of . It follows from Proposition 4 and the formulae for the inverse image of a union and an intersection [Set Theory, R, § 4, formulae (34) and (46)] that the open (resp. closed) sets in the topology are the inverse images under of the open (resp. closed) sets of ; consequently, for each , the sets , where runs through a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of in , form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of in the topology . In § 3 we shall study, under the name of induced topology, the particular case in which is a subset of and is the canonical injection ; , with the induced topology, is then called a subspace of .
For a mapping of a topological space into a topological space to be continuous it is necessary and sufficient that the topology of is finer than the inverse image under of the topology of .
Example 2
Least upper bound of a set of topologies. Every family of topologies on a set has a least upper bound in the ordered set of all topologies on , i.e. there exists a topology on which is coarsest among all the topologies on which are finer than each of the . To see this we may apply Proposition 4, taking to be the set with the topology , and to be the identity map ; is the coarsest topology for which all the mappings are continuous.
Let be an arbitrary set of subsets of a set ; amongst the topologies on for which the sets of are open, there is a topology which is coarser than all the others and which is called the topology generated by . For each set let be the topology whose open sets are and [it is clear that this set of subsets of satisfies (O_I) and (O_{II})]; then is just the least upper bound of the topologies . By Proposition 4, if is the set of finite intersections of sets belonging to , then is a base of the topology . We say that is a subbase of .
Example 3
Product topology. Let be a family of topological spaces. The coarsest topology on the product set for which the projections are continuous mappings is called the product of the topologies of the ; we shall study it in more detail in
4. Final topologies
Proposition 6
Let be a set, let be a family of topological spaces, and for each let be a mapping of into . Let be the set of subsets of such that is open in for each ; then is the set of open subsets of in a topology on which is the final structure on for the family (Set Theory, Chapter IV, § 2, no. 5), and in particular is the finest topology on for which the mappings are continuous. In other words, if is a mapping of into a topological space , then is continuous ( carrying the topology ) if and only if each of the mappings is continuous.
It is immediately verified that satisfies the axioms and . [Set Theory, R, § 4, formulae (34) and (46)]. We shall prove the last assertion of the proposition, which implies the other assertions by reason of the general properties of final structures (Set Theory, Chapter IV, § 2, no. 5, criterion CST 18). It is clear that the are continuous in the topology , by the definition of (no. 1, Theorem 1); hence if is continuous, so is each mapping (no. 1, Theorem 2). Conversely, suppose that each is continuous, and let be an open set in ; by hypothesis, is open in for each ; hence , and the proof is complete.
Corollary
Under the hypotheses of Proposition 6, a subset of is closed in the topology if and only if is closed in for each .
This follows from the definition of the open sets in the topology by taking complements.
The general properties of final structures (Set Theory, Chapter IV, § 2, no. 5, criterion CST 19) imply the following transitivity property (the direct proof of which is also straightforward):
Proposition 7
Let be a set, a family of topological spaces, a partition of , and a family of sets indexed by . Also, for each let be a mapping of into ; for each and each let be a mapping of into , and put . If each carries the finest topology for which the mappings are continuous, then the finest topology on for which the are continuous is the same as the finest topology for which the are continuous.
Examples
1) Quotient topology. Let be a topological space, an equivalence relation on , the quotient set of with respect to the relation , the canonical mapping. The finest topology on for which is continuous is called the quotient of the topology of by the relation ; we shall study it in more detail in § 3.
2) Greatest lower bound of a set of topologies. Every family of topologies on a set has a greatest lower bound in the set of all topologies on , i.e. is the finest of all the topologies on which are coarser than each of the . To see this we may apply Proposition 6, taking to be the set with the topology , and to be the identity mapping . If is the set of subsets of which are open in the topology , then the set is the set of subsets of which are open in . is also called the intersection of the topologies .
3) Sum of topological spaces. Let be a family of topological spaces, the set which is the sum of the (Set Theory, Chapter II, § 4, no. 8, Definition 8); for each , let be the canonical (injective) mapping of into . The finest topology on for which the mappings are continuous is called the sum of the topologies of the , and with this topology is said to be the sum of the topological spaces . Let us identify each of the with a subset of by means of ; then a set is open (resp. closed) in the topology if and only if each of the sets is open (resp. closed) in . In particular, each of the is both open and closed.
The following proposition generalizes the situation of Example 3:
Proposition 8
Let be a set, a family of subsets of . Suppose each carries a topology such that, for each pair of indices : 1) is open (resp. closed) in each of the topologies . 2) The topologies induced on by and coincide. Let be the finest topology on for which the injections are continuous. Then, for each , is open (resp. closed) in in the topology , and the topology induced by on coincides with .
In view of Proposition 6 and its corollary, it is enough to show that for each and each subset of the following statements are equivalent: (i) is open (resp. closed) in the topology . (ii) For each , is open (resp. closed) in the topology .
It is clear that (ii) implies (i) by taking . Conversely, if (i) is satisfied, then is open (resp. closed) in for the topology induced on by ; but is also the topology induced on by ; hence is also the intersection of with a subset of which is open (resp. closed) in the topology ; since is open (resp. closed) in , so is . This completes the proof.
We remark that if the union of the is different from , then the topology induced by on is discrete. For if belongs to none of the , then is open in each topology and therefore is open in the topology .
5. Pasting together of topological spaces
Let be a family of sets, and let be the set which is the sum of the (Set Theory, Chapter II, § 4, no. 8, Definition 8); we shall identify each with a subset of by means of the canonical injection .
Let be an equivalence relation on such that each equivalence class of has at most one element in each ; for each pair of indices let be the subset of consisting of the elements for which there is an element which belongs to the equivalence class of . Clearly to each corresponds a unique which is congruent to mod ; the mappings so defined satisfy the following conditions:
(i) For each , is the identity mapping of .
(ii) For each triple of indices of and each , we have and
Conversely, suppose that for each pair of indices we are given a subset of and a mapping satisfying the conditions (i) and (ii) above. It follows first of all from (ii) applied to the triples and that (resp. ) is the restriction of (resp. ) to (resp. ); hence we deduce from (i) that and are bijections which are inverses of each other. Now let be the relation "there exist such that , and ". It follows from (i) and from what precedes that is reflexive and symmetric; on the other hand, if ,
then also and therefore, by (ii), ; the relation (i) thus shows that is transitive, and therefore is an equivalence relation on . It follows also from (i) and from the definition of that each equivalence class mod has at most one element in each of the sets , and that is the set of all for which there is an element congruent to mod . We say that the quotient set is obtained by pasting together the along the by means of the bijections . If is the canonical mapping, the restriction of to each is a bijection of onto .
Now suppose that each is a topological space, and let be its topology. Let be the finest topology on the set for which the mappings are continuous; is the quotient by of the topology on which is the sum of the topologies . We say that the topological space (with the topology ) is obtained by pasting together the topological spaces along the by means of the bijections . The open (resp. closed) subsets of are thus the canonical images of the subsets of which are saturated with respect to and are such that is open (resp. closed) in for each .
Since the restriction of to each is a bijection onto the subset of , we can transport the topology to by means of this bijection, so that carries a topology ; and the topology on is the finest for which the canonical injections are continuous. In general, the topology induced by on is coarser than , but not identical with the latter; even if the are homeomorphisms (§ 3, Exercise 15). However, it follows from no. 4, Proposition 8 that, with the preceding notation:
Proposition 9
Suppose that the* are homeomorphisms and that each is open (resp. closed) in ; then each is open (resp. closed) in and the restriction of to is a homeomorphism of onto the subspace of .
Exercises
See the exercises for § 2.