3. Subspaces; quotient spaces
1. Subspaces of a topological space
Let be a subset of a topological space . We have defined the topology induced on by the topology of as the inverse image of the latter under the canonical injection (§ 2, no. 3, Example 1). An equivalent definition is as follows:
Definition 1
Let be a subset of a topological space . The topology induced on by the topology of is that in which the open sets are the intersections with of open sets of . The set with this topology is called a subspace of .
Example
The topology induced on the set of rational integers by the topology of the rational line is the discrete topology, for the intersection of and the open interval is the set .
By Proposition 5 of § 2, no. 3 (or directly from Definition 1) we see that, if , the subspace of is identical with the subspace of the subspace of (transitivity of induced topologies). If is a subbase (resp. a base) of the topology of (, no. 3, Example 3) its trace on is a subbase (resp. a base) of the topology induced on .
In all questions which involve the elements or subsets of , it is essential to distinguish carefully between their properties as points (resp. subsets) of , and their properties as points (resp. subsets) of the subspace . We shall make this distinction by using the phrases "in ", "with respect to ", or "relative to " to refer to properties in the latter category (possibly contrasting them with the phrases "in ", "with respect to ", "relative to ").
An open set of the subspace need not be open in ; in order that every set which is open in should be open in it is necessary and sufficient that is open in . The condition is necessary, since is open in , and it is sufficient by virtue of and Definition 1.
The sets which are closed in are the intersections with of the closed sets in (, no. 3, Example 1); as above we see that every set which is closed in is closed in if and only if is closed in .
The neighbourhoods of a point relative to are the intersections with of neighbourhoods of relative to . Every neighbourhood of relative to is a neighbourhood of relative to if and only if is a neighbourhood of in .
Proposition 1
If and are two subsets of a topological space , and , then the closure of in the subspace is the intersection with of the closure of in .
If , every neighbourhood of in is of the form , where is a neighbourhood of in . Since , it follows that lies in the closure of with respect to if and only if lies in the closure of with respect to .
Corollary
A subset of is dense in if and only if in (i.e. if and only if ).
It follows that if are three subsets of such that , and if is dense in , and is dense in , then is dense in (transitivity of density), for we have in .
Proposition 2
Let be a dense subset of a topological space ; then for each and each neighbourhood of relative to , the closure of in is a neighbourhood of in .
For contains , where is an open subset of which contains , hence contains (§ 1, no. 6, Proposition 5).
Proposition 3
Let be a family of subsets of a topological space , such that one of the following properties holds: a) The interiors of the cover . b) is a locally finite closed covering of (§ 1, no. 5).
Under these conditions, a subset of is open (resp. closed) in if and only if each of the sets is open (resp. closed) in .
Clearly if is open (resp. closed) in , then is open (resp. closed) in . Conversely, suppose first that condition a) is satisfied; since , it is enough, by duality, to consider the case in which each of the is open with respect to . In this case is open in for each , and therefore open in ; and since by hypothesis, it follows that is open in .
Now suppose that b) is satisfied; by duality again, we need only consider the case in which each of the is closed in , and therefore closed in . Since the family is locally finite and , it follows from § 1, no. 5, Proposition 4 that is closed in .
Remark
Let be an open covering of a topological space , and for each let be a base of the topology of the subspace of ; then it is clear that is a base of the topology of .
2. Continuity with respect to a subspace
Let and be two topological spaces, a mapping of into , a subset of which contains . The definition of the induced topology as an initial topology (§ 2, no. 3, Proposition 4) shows that is continuous at if and only if the mapping of into the subspace of , having the same graph as , is continuous at .
Now let be a subset of ; if is continuous at (resp. continuous on ), its restriction is a mapping of the subspace into , which is continuous at (resp. continuous on ) by Proposition 2 of § 2, no. 1. We shall sometimes say that a mapping is continuous relative to at (resp. continuous relative to ) if its restriction is continuous at (resp. continuous on ).
It should be noted that can be continuous without being continuous at any point of ; an example of this phenomenon is provided by the characteristic function of a subset of which is such that both and its complement are dense in (, Exercise 11), being regarded as a mapping of into the discrete space . is not continuous at any point of , but its restriction to is constant and therefore continuous.
If is a neighbourhood in of a point , and if is such that is continuous at , then is continuous at ; for each neighbourhood of in is a neighbourhood of in (local character of continuity).
Proposition 4
Let* be a family of subsets of a topological space whose interiors cover , or which is a locally finite closed covering of . Let be a mapping of into a topological space . If the restriction of to each of the subspaces is continuous, then *is continuous.
For if is a closed subset of and if , then is closed in for each (, no. 1, Theorem 1) and therefore is closed in by Proposition 3 of no. 1; the result now follows from Theorem 1 of , no. 1.
3. Locally closed subspaces
Definition 2
A subset* of a topological space is said to be locally closed at a point if there is a neighbourhood of in such that is a closed subset of the subspace . L is said to be locally closed in if it is locally closed at each .
Remark
Let be a subset of such that for each point of there is a neighbourhood of such that is closed in the subspace ; then it follows from Proposition 3 of no. 1 that is closed in . On the other hand, Proposition 5 below shows that in general there are locally closed sets which are not closed in .
Proposition 5
For a subset* of a topological space , the following properties are equivalent:
a) is locally closed in .
b) is the intersection of an open subset and a closed subset of .
c) is open in its closure in .
If is locally closed, then, for each , there is an open neighbourhood of in such that is closed in ; is open in , and Proposition 3 of no. 1 shows that is closed in ; therefore a) implies b). If , where is open and closed in , we have ; hence , which shows that is open in , so that b) implies c). Finally, if , where is open in , is closed in , hence locally closed, and thus c) implies a).
Corollary
Let be a continuous map and a locally closed subset of ; then is locally closed in *.
This follows immediately from Proposition 5 above and Theorem 1 of § 2, no. 1.
4. Quotient spaces
Definition 3
Let be a topological space, an equivalence relation on . The quotient space of by is the quotient set with the topology which is the quotient of the topology of by the relation (§ 2, no. 4, Example 1)*.
Unless the contrary is expressly stated, whenever we speak of as a topological space, it is to be understood that we mean the quotient space of by . We shall often say that this topological space is the space obtained by identifying the points of which belong to the same equivalence class mod .
Let be the canonical mapping . By definition (§ 2, no. 4, Proposition 6 and its corollary) the open (resp. closed) sets in are the sets such that is open (resp. closed) in ; in other words, the open (resp. closed) sets in are in one-to-one correspondence with the open (resp. closed) subsets of which are saturated with respect to and are the canonical images of these subsets.
Proposition 6
Let be a topological space, an equivalence relation on , the canonical mapping of onto ; then a mapping of into a topological space is continuous if and only if is continuous on *.
This is a particular case of § 2, no. 4, Proposition 6; it expresses the fact that the quotient topology is the final topology for the mapping .
Proposition 6 shows that there is a one-to-one correspondence between the continuous mappings of into and the continuous maps of into which are constant on each equivalence class mod .
Example
Consider the equivalence relation on the real line ; the quotient space of by this relation is called the one-dimensional torus and is denoted by . The equivalence class of a point consists of all the points , where runs through the set of rational integers. By Proposition 6 there is a one-to-one correspondence between the continuous functions on and the continuous functions on which are periodic with period 1. We shall return to this important example in Chapter V, § 1.
Corollary
Let be two topological spaces, (resp. ) an equivalence relation on (resp. ), and let be a continuous mapping which is compatible with the equivalence relations and (Set Theory R, § 5, no. 8); then the mapping induced by (Set Theory R, § 5, no. 8) is continuous.
This is a particular case of a general property of quotient structures (Set Theory, Chapter IV, § 2, no. 6, criterion CST 20).
Proposition 7 (Transitivity of quotient spaces)
Let and be two equivalence relations on a topological space such that implies , and let be the quotient equivalence relation on the quotient space (Set Theory R, § 5, no. 9). Then the canonical bijection is a homeomorphism.
This is a particular case of the transitivity of final topologies (§ 2, no. 4, Proposition 7. Cf. Set Theory, Chapter IV, § 2, no. 3, criterion CST 21).
5. Canonical decomposition of a continuous mapping
Let and be two topological spaces, a continuous map, the equivalence relation on . Consider the canonical decomposition
where is the canonical (surjective) mapping of onto the quotient space , is the canonical injection of the subspace into , and is the bijection associated with (Set Theory R, § 5, no. 3). It is immediately seen that is continuous (by Proposition 6 of no. 4); this is also a particular case of a general result on quotient structures. (Cf. Set Theory, Chapter IV, § 2, no. 6). But the bijection is not necessarily a homeomorphism.
Proposition 8
Let be the canonical decomposition of a continuous mapping , and let denote the equivalence relation
For the condition b) [resp. c)] expresses that the image under of every open (resp. closed) set in is an open (resp. closed) set in .
Example
Let be a topological space, a covering of , the sum of the subspaces of ; then there is a partition of into subspaces which are both open and closed, and for each there is a homeomorphism . Let be the continuous mapping which agrees with on for each , and let be the equivalence relation ; the quotient space is thus obtained by "pasting together" the (§ 2, no. 5). Consider the bijection associated with ; in general is not a homeomorphism, as is shown by the example in which each consists of a single point and is not discrete. However, if the interiors of the cover , or if is a locally finite closed covering of , then is a homeomorphism: for if is any open subset of which is saturated with respect to , then for each the set
The following proposition gives a simple sufficient condition for to be a homeomorphism:
Proposition 9
Let be a continuous surjection, and let denote the equivalence relation . If there is a continuous section associated with (Set Theory, Chapter II, § 3, no. 8, Definition 11), then the mapping associated with is a homeomorphism, and is a homeomorphism of onto the subspace of .
For if is the canonical mapping, then and are bijective, continuous and inverse to each other; likewise and the restriction of to are bijective, continuous and inverse to each other.
If is an equivalence relation on a topological space and
A continuous section of a topological space with respect to an equivalence relation need not exist (Exercise 12).
6. Quotient space of a subspace
Let be a topological space, a subspace of , an equivalence relation on , the canonical map , the restriction of to . The equivalence relation on is just the relation induced by on (Set Theory R, § 5, no. 5). Let be the canonical decomposition of , so that if is the canonical injection of into we have a commutative diagram (*)
Proposition 10
The canonical bijection* is continuous. Furthermore, the following three statements are equivalent:
a) is a homeomorphism.
b) Every open subset of which is saturated with respect to is the intersection with of an open subset of which is saturated with respect to .
c) Every closed subset of which is saturated with respect to is the intersection with of a closed subset of which is saturated with respect to .
The first part of the proposition is immediate (no. 5). The second part follows from Proposition 8 of no. 5: if is an open (resp. closed) subset of which is saturated with respect to , and is the intersection with of an open (resp. closed) subset of , then is the intersection with of the open (resp. closed) subset
(*) This expression means that .
of X, which is saturated with respect to R; and conversely, if B is the intersection with A of an open (resp. closed) subset D which is saturated with respect to R, then is the intersection of and , which is open (resp. closed) in .
Corollary 1
If A is an open (resp. closed) subset of X which is saturated with respect to R, then the canonical mapping is a homeomorphism.
For if A is open (resp. closed) in X and saturated with respect to R, and if is open (resp. closed) in A and saturated with respect to , then B is open (resp. closed) in X and saturated with respect to R.
Corollary 2
If there is a continuous mapping such that is congruent to mod R for each , then and the canonical mapping is a homeomorphism.
Since each equivalence class mod R meets A, the canonical image of in is the whole of ; on the other hand, if U is open in A and is saturated with respect to , it follows from the hypothesis that is the set obtained by saturating U with respect to R; since is continuous, is open in X (§ 2, no. 1, Theorem 1). The corollary follows from this fact by virtue of Proposition 10.
Example
Let R denote the equivalence relation on the real line (no. 4, Example) and let A denote the closed interval ; A contains at least one point of each equivalence class mod R. The canonical mapping of onto the torus T is a homeomorphism; for if F is closed in A (and hence in R), in order to saturate F with respect to the relation R we have to take the union of the closed sets (for all ), which evidently form a locally finite family, so that their union is closed (§ 1, no. 5, Proposition 4); the assertion follows from this. We remark that is obtained by identifying the points 0 and 1 in A. \
Exercises
See the exercises for § 3.