4. Product of topological spaces
1. Product spaces
Definition 1
Given a family of topological spaces, the product space of this family is the product set with the topology which is the product of the topologies of the (§ 2, no. 3, Example 3). The spaces are called the factors of X.
By virtue of § 2, no. 3, Proposition 4, the product topology on has as a base the set of finite intersections of sets of the form , where is open in ; these sets are products , where is open in for each and for all but a finite number of indices. These sets will be called elementary sets.
If is a base of the topology of (for each ), it is clear that the elementary sets such that for each index such that form another base of the product topology. The elementary sets of this type which contain a given point thus form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of (, no. 3, Proposition 3).
If is a finite set, the construction of the product topology from the topologies of the factors is simpler: the elementary sets are just products , where is any open subset of , for each (cf. Exercise 9).
Example
\* The product of spaces identical with the real line is called real number space of dimensions; is also called the real plane (cf. Chapter VI, § 1). Likewise, starting from the rational line , we define the rational number space of dimensions (rational plane for ).
The topology of the space has as a base the set of all products of open intervals in , which are called open boxes of dimensions. The open boxes which contain a point form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of this point. Likewise the products of closed intervals in are called closed boxes of dimensions. The closed boxes to which is interior also form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of . There are analogous results for . \
Proposition 1
Let be a mapping of a topological space into a product space . Then is continuous at a point if and only if is continuous at for each .
Since , this is just a particular case of Proposition 4 of § 2, no. 3.
Corollary 1
Let be two families of topological spaces with the same set of indices. For each , let be a mapping of into . In order that the product mapping of
f can be written as , so that by Proposition 1 the condition is sufficient. Conversely, for each let be the mapping of into such that and whenever ; then is continuous at the point , by Proposition 1. Since it follows that if is continuous at , then is continuous at .
Corollary 2
Let be two topological spaces. In order that a mapping should be continuous it is necessary and sufficient that the mapping is a homeomorphism of onto the graph of (considered as a subspace of the product space ).
Since , the condition is sufficient. It is also necessary, for if is continuous, then is bijective and continuous (Proposition 1) and the inverse of is the restriction of to , which is continuous (cf. Set Theory, Chapter IV, § 2, no. 4, criterion CST 17).
Proposition 2 (Associativity of topological products)
Let be a family of topological spaces, a partition of the set , and for each let be the product of the spaces for . Then the canonical mapping of the product space*
This is a particular case of transitivity of initial topologies ( 2, no. 3, Proposition 5; cf. Set Theory, Chapter IV, § 2, no. 4, criterion CST 13).
Generally we identify the product spaces and by means of the canonical mapping.
Corollary
Let be a permutation of the set . Then the mapping is a homeomorphism of*
Take and for each in Proposition 2.
Proposition 3
Let be a set, a family of topological spaces, and for each let be a mapping of into . Let be the mapping of into , and let be the coarsest topology on for which the mappings are continuous. Then is the inverse image under of the topology induced on by the product topology on .
This is another particular case of transitivity of initial topologies (\S\ 2, no. 3, Proposition 5; cf. Set Theory, Chapter IV, \S\ 2, no. 4, criterion CST 15).
Corollary
For each let be a subspace of . Then the topology induced on by the product topology on is the product of the topologies of the subspaces .
Let be the canonical injection , and apply Proposition 3 to the mappings (cf. Set Theory, Chapter IV, \S\ 2, no. 4, criterion CST 14).
2. Section of an open set; section of a closed set; projection of an open set. Partial continuity
Proposition 4
Let be two topological spaces; then for each , the mapping is a homeomorphism of onto the subspace of .
This is a particular case of Corollary 1 of Proposition 1 of no. 1 applied to the constant function .
The mapping is a continuous section (\S\ 3, no. 5) with respect to the equivalence relation in ; the quotient space by this equivalence relation is therefore homeomorphic to .
Corollary
The section of an open (resp. closed) set of the product at an arbitrary point is open (resp. closed) in .
Proposition 5
The projection of an open set of the product onto either factor is an open set.
For example, we have , and the proposition follows from the Corollary to Proposition 4 and axiom (O_1).
Remark 1
The projection of a closed subset of onto a factor need not be closed. For example, in the rational plane , the hyperbola whose equation is is a closed set, but both its projections are equal to the complement of the point 0 in , and this is not a closed set.
(*) By the section of at is meant the set of all such that (cf. Set Theory R, \S\ 3, no. 7).
Proposition 6
Let be three topological spaces, a mapping of the product space into . If is continuous at the point then the partial mapping of into is continuous at the point .
For this mapping is the composition of and the mapping ; hence the result follows from Proposition 4.
Proposition 6 is often expressed by saying that a continuous function of two variables is continuous with respect to each of them separately.
Remark 2
It is possible for all the partial mappings determined by a map to be continuous without being continuous on (cf. Chapter IX, § 5, Exercise 23). \* For example if is the mapping of the real plane into defined by
If is a mapping of into , continuous at a point , then the mapping of is continuous at all points , for it is the composition of and the projection onto .
The results of this subsection are easily extended to an arbitrary product of topological spaces by remarking that this product is homeomorphic to the product for any partition of (no. 1, Proposition 2).
3. Closure in a product
Proposition 7
In a product space , the closure of a product of sets is the same as the product of their closures.
Suppose that lies in the closure of ; then for each , is in the closure of because of the continuity of (§ 2, no. 1, Theorem 1) and therefore . Conversely, let , and let be any elementary set containing ; for each , contains a point ; hence contains the point and therefore lies in the closure of .
Corollary
A product* of non-empty sets is closed in the product space if and only if is closed in for each .
If is finite, a product is open provided that is open in for each ; but this is no longer so if is infinite.
Proposition 8
Let* be any point of a product space ; then the set of points such that except for a finite number of indices is dense in .
For each and each elementary set which contains , we have except for indices belonging to a finite subset of ; if we take for and for , it is clear that
4. Inverse limits of topological spaces
Let be a partially ordered (but not necessarily directed) set (*), in which the order relation is written . For each , let be a topological space, and for each pair such that let be a mapping of into . We say that is an inverse system of topological spaces if: 1) is an inverse system of sets; 2) is a continuous mapping whenever . Let denote the set , and for each let be the canonical mapping ; then the coarsest topology on for which the are continuous is said to be the inverse limit (with respect to the ) of the topologies of the , and the set with this topology is called the inverse limit of the inverse system of topological spaces . Whenever we speak of as a topological space, it is always to be understood that the topology of this space is the inverse limit of the topologies of the , unless the contrary is expressly stated.
The set is the subset of the product consisting of those points such that
() That is, a set endowed with a reflexive and transitive relation (Set Theory* R, § 6, no. 1).
a subspace of such that the form an inverse system of subsets of the (Set Theory chapter III, , n° 2), then it is clear that the topological space is a subspace of
Let be another inverse system of topological spaces indexed by the same set , and for each let be a continuous mapping such that is an inverse system of mappings; then is a continuous mapping of into . For if is the canonical mapping , we have , so that is continuous for each , and the assertion follows from Proposition 4 of § 2, no. 3.
Finally, suppose is a directed set, and let be a cofinal subset of ; let be the inverse limit of the inverse system of topological spaces . Then the canonical bijection (Set Theory, Chapter III, § 7, no. 2, proposition 3) is a homeomorphism. For we have for each ; hence is continuous (no. 1, Proposition 1); and if is the inverse of , then for each there exists such that , and therefore , which shows that is continuous (no. 1, Proposition 1), since the are continuous.
Proposition 9
Let be a directed set and a cofinal subset of . Let be an inverse system of topological spaces indexed by ; let and let be the canonical mapping. Then the family of sets , where runs through and runs through a base of the topology of for each , is a base of the topology of .
From § 2, no. 3 we know that the finite intersections of sets of the form ( open in ) form a base of the topology of . If is a finite family of indices of , then there exists such that for ; hence ; if we put
then we have
but is open and is therefore a union of sets belonging to . Hence the result.
Corollary
Let be a subset of and let denote for each . Then:
(i) The (resp. the ) form an inverse system of subsets of the , and
(ii) If is closed in , .
The first assertion of (i) follows from the relations for and from the continuity of the (§ 2, no. 1, Theorem 1). Let denote
To establish (ii) it is enough to remark that, without any restriction on , we have ; now if is closed, then from (i)
Example
Let be a directed set and a family of subsets of a set , such that whenever . For each let be a topology on such that is finer than the topology induced on by whenever . If we take to be the canonical injection for , then may be identified canonically with the intersection of the , with the topology which is the least upper bound (§ 2, no. 3, Example 2) of the topologies induced on by the .
Exercises
See the exercises for § 4.