4. Complex number spaces and projective spaces
1. The vector space
Since the topological space can be identified with , the topological product of spaces identical with can be identified with quâ topological space; likewise, the topological group structure of , the product of the additive (topological) group structures of the factors, can be identified with that of the additive group . But since is a field, we may define on the structure of an -dimensional vector space over , the product of a complex number and a point of being the point ; this vector space structure should be carefully distinguished from the structure of a -dimensional vector space over , defined on (Chapter VI, § 1, no. 3). We shall reserve the notation for the topological space which is the product of spaces identical with , endowed in addition with the vector space structure over which has just been defined; is called complex number space of dimensions. Note that the mapping is continuous on .
An affine linear mapping of into is also an affine linear mapping of into , but the converse is false.
For example, the mapping is a linear mapping of the vector space onto itself but is not a linear mapping of the vector space onto itself.
Every affine linear mapping of into is therefore uniformly continuous; in particular, every affine linear mapping of onto itself is a homeomorphism.
Every affine linear variety of dimensions () in the vector space is also an affine linear variety of dimensions in the vector space ; here again, the converse is false. To avoid all confusion, (affine) linear varieties of dimensions in will be called complex linear varieties of dimensions (the linear varieties of being called real linear varieties when necessary to prevent misunderstanding). In particular, complex linear varieties of one dimension (resp. two dimensions) are called complex lines (resp. complex planes), and complex linear varieties of dimensions are called complex hyperplanes.
It is often convenient to regard real number space as embedded in complex number space , by identifying with the subset of defined by the relations (). The topological group structure induced on this subset by the topological group structure of coincides with that of .
Note that , thus embedded in , is not a complex linear variety in .
A system of vectors of which is free over is also free over . Every real linear variety of dimensions in generates a complex linear variety of dimensions in such that is the trace of on ; if is defined by a system of linear equations , where the are linear forms on (with real coefficients, and linearly independent over ) and the are real numbers, then the same equations define , but now the coordinates of take complex values.
Conversely, if a complex linear variety of dimensions has a non-empty intersection with , this intersection is a real linear variety, but its dimension may be .
2. Topology of vector spaces and algebras over the field
All the definitions and all the results of nos. 5 and 6 of Chapter VI, § 1, relative to topologies on vector spaces and algebras over the field , and in particular spaces and algebras of matrices with elements in , remain valid with no modifications when we replace by throughout.
3. Complex projective spaces
With the notation recalled in Chapter VI, § 3, no. 1, we make the following definition, analogous to the definition of real projective spaces:
Definition 1
The projective space* , endowed with the topology which is the quotient of that of by the equivalence relation , is called complex projective space of *dimensions.
The projective space is called the complex projective line, and is called the complex projective plane.
Most of the arguments relating to real projective spaces extend with very slight modifications to complex projective spaces.
In the first place we see that the topological space is Hausdorff by the argument of Proposition 1 of Chapter VI, § 3. no. 1, which applies word for word simply by replacing by . Again, the proof of Proposition 2 of Chapter VI, § 3. no. 1 shows that is compact and connected, and homeomorphic to the quotient of the sphere (considered as embedded in the space , identified with ) by the equivalence relation induced on this sphere by ; the only point of difference is that now, if , the equivalence classes for this relation are homeomorphic to the circle .
For this reason, Proposition 3 of Chapter VI. § 3, no. 1 has no analogue for complex projective spaces.
Next one shows, as in Chapter VI, § 3, no. 2, that every -dimensional projective linear variety in the space is a closed set, homeomorphic to , and that its complement is dense in if . The proof of Proposition 5 of Chapter VI, § 3, no. 2 can be transposed as it stands, simply by substituting for , and shows that (if ) the complement of a projective hyperplane in is homeomorphic to , and therefore that every point has a neighbourhood homeomorphic to . This result allows us to embed complex number space in complex projective space , by identifying with the complement of a projective hyperplane, called the "hyperplane at infinity" (usually the hyperplane whose equation is ). In the particular case , the hyperplane at infinity is a point, and Alexandroff's theorem shows that is homeomorphic to the space obtained by compactifying the locally compact space by adjoining a "point at infinity", denoted by . Proposition 4 of Chapter VI. § 2, no. 4 then shows that the complex projective line is homeomorphic to the sphere .
We leave to the reader the task of enunciating the results analogous to those of Chapter VI. § 3. no. 4, for functions which take their values in .
Consider the space as embedded in (no. 1). Let be the canonical mapping of onto its quotient space . The subspace consists of the points of which have at least one system of real homogeneous coordinates; let us show that is homeomorphic to real projective space , which will allow us to consider the space as embedded in . Now the relation induced by on is ; the canonical mapping of
onto is continuous (Chapter I, § 3, no. 6, Proposition 10); since
is compact, must be a homeomorphism (Chapter I, § 9, no. 4, Theorem 2, Corollary 2).
We can also prove that is bicontinuous without using the compactness of , by invoking the criterion of Proposition 10 of Chapter I, § 3, no. 6 (see Exercise 3).
Since every vector subspace of dimensions of generates a complex vector subspace of dimensions in , we see that every projective linear variety of dimensions in ( is called a real projective linear variety) generates a projective linear variety of dimensions in ( is called a complex projective linear variety), such that is the trace of on . Moreover, every system of (homogeneous) equations of is also a system of (homogeneous) equations of when we allow the variables to take complex values.
4. Spaces of complex projective linear varieties
With the notation recalled in Chapter VI, § 3, no. 5, we define similarly the spaces of projective linear varieties in a complex projective space:
Definition 2
The quotient space* of the topological space by the equivalence relation is called the space of projective linear varieties of dimensions in the projective space .
By the argument of Proposition 6 of Chapter VI, § 3, no. 5, we see first of all that is Hausdorff. Next we prove that it is compact by replacing the subspace (in the proof of Proposition 7 of Chapter VI, § 3, no. 5) by the subspace of consisting of systems of vectors which form an orthonormal Hermitian basis of the vector subspace they generate; that is to say, consists of the matrices which satisfy the conditions
The proof of Proposition 8 of Chapter VI, § 3, no. 5 extends unaltered for the space and shows that this space is connected and locally connected and that each of its points has a neighbourhood homeomorphic to . Finally the proof of Proposition 9 of Chapter VI, § 3, no. 6 applies without change, and therefore the Grassmannian is homeomorphic to .
Remark
Most of the properties common to the real and complex number spaces (resp. projective spaces) are also valid for number spaces (resp. projective spaces) defined in the same way over the division ring of quaternions ; indeed, they are capable of extension to many other topological fields and division rings (cf. Exercises 2 and 6).
Exercises
See the exercises for § 4.