Bourbaki

4. Complex number spaces and projective spaces

1. The vector space Cn\mathbf{C}^n

Since the topological space C\mathbf{C} can be identified with R2\mathbf{R}^2, the topological product Cn\mathbf{C}^n of nn spaces identical with C\mathbf{C} can be identified with R2n\mathbf{R}^{2n} quâ topological space; likewise, the topological group structure of Cn\mathbf{C}^n, the product of the additive (topological) group structures of the nn factors, can be identified with that of the additive group R2n\mathbf{R}^{2n}. But since C\mathbf{C} is a field, we may define on Cn\mathbf{C}^n the structure of an nn-dimensional vector space over C\mathbf{C}, the product azaz of a complex number aa and a point z=(zi)z = (z_i) of Cn\mathbf{C}^n being the point (azi)(az_i); this vector space structure should be carefully distinguished from the structure of a 2n2n-dimensional vector space over R\mathbf{R}, defined on R2n\mathbf{R}^{2n} (Chapter VI, § 1, no. 3). We shall reserve the notation Cn\mathbf{C}^n for the topological space which is the product of nn spaces identical with C\mathbf{C}, endowed in addition with the vector space structure over C\mathbf{C} which has just been defined; Cn\mathbf{C}^n is called complex number space of nn dimensions. Note that the mapping (t,z)→tz(t, z) \to tz is continuous on C×Cn\mathbf{C} \times \mathbf{C}^n.

An affine linear mapping of Cn\mathbf{C}^n into Cm\mathbf{C}^m is also an affine linear mapping of R2n\mathbf{R}^{2n} into R2m\mathbf{R}^{2m}, but the converse is false.

For example, the mapping z→z‾z \to \overline{z} is a linear mapping of the vector space R2\mathbf{R}^2 onto itself but is not a linear mapping of the vector space C\mathbf{C} onto itself.

Every affine linear mapping of Cn\mathbf{C}^n into Cm\mathbf{C}^m is therefore uniformly continuous; in particular, every affine linear mapping of Cn\mathbf{C}^n onto itself is a homeomorphism.

Every affine linear variety of pp dimensions (p≤np \leq n) in the vector space Cn\mathbf{C}^n is also an affine linear variety of 2p2p dimensions in the vector space R2n\mathbf{R}^{2n}; here again, the converse is false. To avoid all confusion, (affine) linear varieties of pp dimensions in Cn\mathbf{C}^n will be called complex linear varieties of pp dimensions (the linear varieties of R2n\mathbf{R}^{2n} being called real linear varieties when necessary to prevent misunderstanding). In particular, complex linear varieties of one dimension (resp. two dimensions) are called complex lines (resp. complex planes), and complex linear varieties of n−1n - 1 dimensions are called complex hyperplanes.

It is often convenient to regard real number space Rn\mathbf{R}^n as embedded in complex number space Cn\mathbf{C}^n, by identifying Rn\mathbf{R}^n with the subset of Cn\mathbf{C}^n defined by the relations J(zk)=0J(z_k) = 0 (1≤k≤n1 \leq k \leq n). The topological group structure induced on this subset by the topological group structure of Cn\mathbf{C}^n coincides with that of Rn\mathbf{R}^n.

Note that Rn\mathbf{R}^n, thus embedded in Cn\mathbf{C}^n, is not a complex linear variety in Cn\mathbf{C}^n.

A system of pp vectors of Rn\mathbf{R}^n which is free over R\mathbf{R} is also free over C\mathbf{C}. Every real linear variety VV of pp dimensions in Rn\mathbf{R}^n generates a complex linear variety V′V' of pp dimensions in Cn\mathbf{C}^n such that VV is the trace of V′V' on Rn\mathbf{R}^n; if VV is defined by a system of n−pn - p linear equations fk(x)=akf_k(x) = a_k, where the fkf_k are linear forms on Rn\mathbf{R}^n (with real coefficients, and linearly independent over R\mathbf{R}) and the aka_k are real numbers, then the same equations define V′V', but now the coordinates of xx take complex values.

Conversely, if a complex linear variety of pp dimensions has a non-empty intersection with Rn\mathbf{R}^n, this intersection is a real linear variety, but its dimension may be <p< p.

2. Topology of vector spaces and algebras over the field C\mathbf{C}

All the definitions and all the results of nos. 5 and 6 of Chapter VI, § 1, relative to topologies on vector spaces and algebras over the field R\mathbf{R}, and in particular spaces and algebras of matrices with elements in R\mathbf{R}, remain valid with no modifications when we replace R\mathbf{R} by C\mathbf{C} throughout.

3. Complex projective spaces

With the notation recalled in Chapter VI, § 3, no. 1, we make the following definition, analogous to the definition of real projective spaces:

Definition 1

The projective space* Pn(C)\mathbf{P}_n(\mathbf{C}), endowed with the topology which is the quotient of that of Cn+1∗\mathbf{C}_{n+1}^* by the equivalence relation Δn(C)\Delta_n(\mathbf{C}), is called complex projective space of nn *dimensions.

The projective space P1(C)\mathbf{P}_1(\mathbf{C}) is called the complex projective line, and P2(C)\mathbf{P}_2(\mathbf{C}) is called the complex projective plane.

Most of the arguments relating to real projective spaces extend with very slight modifications to complex projective spaces.

In the first place we see that the topological space Pn(C)P_n(\mathbf{C}) is Hausdorff by the argument of Proposition 1 of Chapter VI, § 3. no. 1, which applies word for word simply by replacing R\mathbf{R} by C\mathbf{C}. Again, the proof of Proposition 2 of Chapter VI, § 3. no. 1 shows that Pn(C)P_n(\mathbf{C}) is compact and connected, and homeomorphic to the quotient of the sphere S2n−1S_{2n-1} (considered as embedded in the space Cn−1∗C_{n-1}^*, identified with R2n−2∗R_{2n-2}^*) by the equivalence relation induced on this sphere by Δn(C)\Delta_n(\mathbf{C}); the only point of difference is that now, if n⩾0n \geqslant 0, the equivalence classes for this relation are homeomorphic to the circle S1S_1.

For this reason, Proposition 3 of Chapter VI. § 3, no. 1 has no analogue for complex projective spaces.

Next one shows, as in Chapter VI, § 3, no. 2, that every pp-dimensional projective linear variety in the space Pn(C)P_n(\mathbf{C}) is a closed set, homeomorphic to PrCP_r \mathbf{C}, and that its complement is dense in Pn(C)P_n(\mathbf{C}) if p<np < n. The proof of Proposition 5 of Chapter VI, § 3, no. 2 can be transposed as it stands, simply by substituting C\mathbf{C} for R\mathbf{R}, and shows that (if n⩾0n \geqslant 0) the complement of a projective hyperplane in Pn(C)P_n(\mathbf{C}) is homeomorphic to C∗\mathbf{C}^*, and therefore that every point has a neighbourhood homeomorphic to C∗\mathbf{C}^*. This result allows us to embed complex number space Cn\mathbf{C}^n in complex projective space Pn(C)P_n(\mathbf{C}), by identifying C∗\mathbf{C}^* with the complement of a projective hyperplane, called the "hyperplane at infinity" (usually the hyperplane whose equation is x0=0x_0 = 0). In the particular case n=1n = 1, the hyperplane at infinity is a point, and Alexandroff's theorem shows that P1CP_1 \mathbf{C} is homeomorphic to the space C~\tilde{\mathbf{C}} obtained by compactifying the locally compact space C\mathbf{C} by adjoining a "point at infinity", denoted by ∞\infty. Proposition 4 of Chapter VI. § 2, no. 4 then shows that the complex projective line P1(C)P_1(\mathbf{C}) is homeomorphic to the sphere S2S_2.

We leave to the reader the task of enunciating the results analogous to those of Chapter VI. § 3. no. 4, for functions which take their values in C\mathbf{C}.

Consider the space Rn+1\mathbf{R}^{n+1} as embedded in Cn+1\mathbf{C}^{n+1} (no. 1). Let ff be the canonical mapping of Cn−1∗C_{n-1}^* onto its quotient space Pn(C)P_n(\mathbf{C}). The subspace f(Rn−1∗)f(\mathbf{R}_{n-1}^*) consists of the points of Pn(C)P_n(\mathbf{C}) which have at least one system of real homogeneous coordinates; let us show that f(Rn−1∗)f(\mathbf{R}_{n-1}^*) is homeomorphic to real projective space Pn(R)P_n(\mathbf{R}), which will allow us to consider the space Pn(R)P_n(\mathbf{R}) as embedded in Pn(C)P_n(\mathbf{C}). Now the relation induced by Δn(C)\Delta_n(\mathbf{C}) on Rn+1∗\mathbf{R}_{n+1}^* is Δn(R)\Delta_n(\mathbf{R}); the canonical mapping φ\varphi of

Rn+1∗/Δn(R)=Pn(R) \mathbf{R}_{n+1}^*/\Delta_n(\mathbf{R}) = P_n(\mathbf{R})

onto f(Rn−1∗)f(\mathbf{R}_{n-1}^*) is continuous (Chapter I, § 3, no. 6, Proposition 10); since

Pn(R)P_n(\mathbf{R}) is compact, φ\varphi must be a homeomorphism (Chapter I, § 9, no. 4, Theorem 2, Corollary 2).

We can also prove that φ\varphi is bicontinuous without using the compactness of Pn(R)P_n(\mathbf{R}), by invoking the criterion of Proposition 10 of Chapter I, § 3, no. 6 (see Exercise 3).

Since every vector subspace of p+1p + 1 dimensions of Rn+1\mathbf{R}^{n+1} generates a complex vector subspace of p+1p + 1 dimensions in Cn+1\mathbf{C}^{n+1}, we see that every projective linear variety VV of pp dimensions in Pn(R)P_n(\mathbf{R}) (VV is called a real projective linear variety) generates a projective linear variety V′V' of pp dimensions in Pn(C)P_n(\mathbf{C}) (V′V' is called a complex projective linear variety), such that VV is the trace of V′V' on Pn(R)P_n(\mathbf{R}). Moreover, every system of (homogeneous) equations of VV is also a system of (homogeneous) equations of V′V' when we allow the variables to take complex values.

4. Spaces of complex projective linear varieties

With the notation recalled in Chapter VI, § 3, no. 5, we define similarly the spaces of projective linear varieties in a complex projective space:

Definition 2

The quotient space* Pn,p(C)P_{n,p}(\mathbf{C}) of the topological space Ln+1, p+1(C)L_{n+1,\ p+1}(\mathbf{C}) by the equivalence relation Δn,p(C)\Delta_{n,p}(\mathbf{C}) is called the space of projective linear varieties of p⩾0p \geqslant 0 dimensions in the projective space Pn(C)P_n(\mathbf{C}).

By the argument of Proposition 6 of Chapter VI, § 3, no. 5, we see first of all that Pn,p(C)P_{n,p}(\mathbf{C}) is Hausdorff. Next we prove that it is compact by replacing the subspace Vn+1, p+1V_{n+1,\ p+1} (in the proof of Proposition 7 of Chapter VI, § 3, no. 5) by the subspace Wn+1, p+1W_{n+1,\ p+1} of Ln+1, p+1(C)L_{n+1,\ p+1}(\mathbf{C}) consisting of systems of p+1p + 1 vectors which form an orthonormal Hermitian basis of the vector subspace they generate; that is to say, Wn+1, p+1W_{n+1,\ p+1} consists of the matrices X=(xij)X = (x_{ij}) which satisfy the conditions

∑j=0nxijx‾ij=1(1≤i≤p+1), \sum_{j=0}^n x_{ij} \overline{x}_{ij} = 1 \quad (1 \leq i \leq p + 1),
∑j=0nxijx‾kj=0(i≠k). \sum_{j=0}^n x_{ij} \overline{x}_{kj} = 0 \quad (i \neq k).

The proof of Proposition 8 of Chapter VI, § 3, no. 5 extends unaltered for the space Pn,p(C)P_{n,p}(\mathbf{C}) and shows that this space is connected and locally connected and that each of its points has a neighbourhood homeomorphic to Cp+1,(n−p)\mathbf{C}^{p+1,(n-p)}. Finally the proof of Proposition 9 of Chapter VI, § 3, no. 6 applies without change, and therefore the Grassmannian Gn,p(C)G_{n,p}(\mathbf{C}) is homeomorphic to Pn,p(C)\mathbf{P}_{n,p}(\mathbf{C}).

Remark

Most of the properties common to the real and complex number spaces (resp. projective spaces) are also valid for number spaces (resp. projective spaces) defined in the same way over the division ring of quaternions H\mathbf{H}; indeed, they are capable of extension to many other topological fields and division rings (cf. Exercises 2 and 6).

Exercises

See the exercises for § 4.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.