Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 00PA, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00PA].

Algebra, VIII, p. 437, Appendix 1. Algebras without Unit Element

a) Let a~\widetilde{\mathfrak{a}} be a left ideal of A~\widetilde{A} such that A~=a~+A\widetilde{A} =\widetilde{\mathfrak{a}}+ A. We set a=a~∩A\mathfrak{a}=\widetilde{\mathfrak{a}}\cap A. There exists an element uu of A such that u−eu-e belongs to a~\widetilde{\mathfrak{a}}. If uu is such an element, then it is a right unit of A modulo a\mathfrak{a}, and we have a~=a+k(u−e)\widetilde{\mathfrak{a}}=\mathfrak{a}+k(u-e); in particular, the ideal a\mathfrak{a} is regular.

b) Conversely, let a\mathfrak{a} be a regular left ideal of A and uu a right unit of A modulo a\mathfrak{a}. Set a~=a+k(u−e)\widetilde{\mathfrak{a}}=\mathfrak{a}+k(u-e). Then a~\widetilde{\mathfrak{a}} is a left ideal of A~\widetilde{A} such that A~=a~+A\widetilde{A} =\widetilde{\mathfrak{a}}+ A, and we have a=a~∩A\mathfrak{a}=\widetilde{\mathfrak{a}}\cap A.

c) If kk is a field, then the condition A~=a~+A\widetilde{A} =\widetilde{\mathfrak{a}}+ A is equivalent to saying that a~\widetilde{\mathfrak{a}} is not contained in A.

Under the assumption of a), the element ee of A~\widetilde{A} can be written as (e−u)+u(e-u)+u with u∈Au\in A and u−e∈a~u-e\in \widetilde{\mathfrak{a}}. Let x=λe+ax=\lambda e+a be an element of A~\widetilde{A}, where λ∈k\lambda \in k and a∈Aa\in A; if xx belongs to a~\widetilde{\mathfrak{a}}, then the element y=a+λu=x+λ(u−e)y=a+\lambda u=x+\lambda (u-e) of A belongs to a\mathfrak{a}, and we have x=y−λ(u−e)x=y-\lambda (u-e); this proves the equality a~=a+k(u−e)\widetilde{\mathfrak{a}}=\mathfrak{a}+k(u-e). Moreover, for every aa in A, the element au−a=a(u−e)au-a=a(u-e) of A belongs to a\mathfrak{a}, so uu is a right unit modulo a\mathfrak{a}. This proves assertion a).

Let a\mathfrak{a} and uu be as in b). Since A~\widetilde{A} is the direct sum of A and k(u−e)k(u-e), we have a~+A=A~\widetilde{\mathfrak{a}}+ A =\widetilde{A} and a~∩A=a\widetilde{\mathfrak{a}}\cap A =\mathfrak{a}. Every element of a~\widetilde{\mathfrak{a}} is of the form x+λ(u−e)x+\lambda (u-e) with x∈ax\in \mathfrak{a} and λ∈k\lambda \in k. For every a∈Aa\in A, we have

a(x+λ(u−e))=ax+λ(au−a) a(x+\lambda (u-e)) =ax+\lambda (au-a)

Since uu is a right unit of A modulo a\mathfrak{a}, the sum ax+λ(au−a)ax+\lambda (au-a) belongs to a\mathfrak{a}, so that a~\widetilde{\mathfrak{a}} is a left ideal of A. This proves b).

Finally, if kk is a field, then A is a hyperplane in A~\widetilde{A}, and A~\widetilde{A} is the sum of a~\widetilde{\mathfrak{a}} and A if and only if a~\widetilde{\mathfrak{a}} is not contained in A.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.