Bourbaki

Lemma 5

Tag 0148, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0148].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VIII, § 7. Finite dimensional modules over a split semi-simple Lie algebra

There exists a unique involutive automorphism X→X∗X \rightarrow X^* of the ring R(a)\mathscr{R}(\mathfrak{a}) such that [E]∗=[E∗][E]^*= [E^*] for every finite dimensional a\mathfrak{a}-module E.

The uniqueness is clear. By Lemma 3, there exists a homomorphism X→X∗X \rightarrow X^* from the additive group R(a)\mathscr{R}(\mathfrak{a}) to itself such that [E]∗=[E∗][E]^*= [E^*] for every finite dimensional a\mathfrak{a}-module E. We have (X∗)∗=X(X^*)^*= X, so this homomorphism is involutive. It is an automorphism of the ring R(a)\mathscr{R}(\mathfrak{a}) since (E⊗F)∗(E\otimes F)^* is isomorphic to E∗⊗F∗E^*\otimes F^* for all finite dimensional a\mathfrak{a}-modules E and F. Q.E.D.

Let U(a)U(\mathfrak{a}) be the enveloping algebra of a,U(a)∗\mathfrak{a}, U(\mathfrak{a})^* the vector space dual of U(a)U(\mathfrak{a}). Recall (Chap. II, §1, no. 5) that the coalgebra structure of U(a)U(\mathfrak{a}) defines on U(a)∗U(\mathfrak{a})^* a commutative, associative algebra structure with unit element. For any finite dimensional a\mathfrak{a}-module E, the map u→u \rightarrow Tr(uEu_E) from U(a)U(\mathfrak{a}) to kk is an element τE\tau_E of U(a)∗U(\mathfrak{a})^*. If 0⟶E′⟶E⟶E′′⟶00\longrightarrow E'\longrightarrow E\longrightarrow E''\longrightarrow 0 is an exact sequence of finite dimensional a\mathfrak{a}-modules, then τE=τE′+τE′′\tau_E=\tau_{E'}+\tau_{E''}. Hence, by Lemma 3 there exists a unique homomorphism, which we denote by Tr, from the additive group R(a)\mathscr{R}(\mathfrak{a}) to the group U(a)∗U(\mathfrak{a})^* such that Tr[E] =τE=\tau_E for every finite dimensional a\mathfrak{a}-module E. If kk denotes the trivial a\mathfrak{a}-module of dimension 1, it is easy to check that Tr[k]k] is the unit element of U(a)∗U(\mathfrak{a})^*. Finally, let E and F be finite dimensional a\mathfrak{a}-modules. Let u∈U(a)u\in U(\mathfrak{a}) and let cc be the coproduct of U(a)U(\mathfrak{a}). By definition of the U-module E⊗FE\otimes F (Chap. I, §3, no. 2), if c(u)=∑iui⊗ui′c(u) =\sum_iu_i\otimes u'_i,

uE⊗F=∑i(ui)E⊗(ui′)F u_{E\otimes F}=\sum_i(u_i)_E\otimes (u'_i)_F

Consequently

τE⊗F(u)=∑i\tau_{E\otimes F}(u) =\sum_i Tr(uiu_i)E_ETr(ui′u'_i)F=∑iτE(ui)τF(ui′)_F=\sum_i\tau_E(u_i)\tau_F(u'_i)

=(τE⊗τF)(c(u)) = (\tau_E\otimes \tau_F)(c(u))

This means that τEτF=τE⊗F\tau_E\tau_F=\tau_{E\otimes F}. Thus, Tr:R(a)→U(a)∗:\mathscr{R}(\mathfrak{a})\rightarrow U(\mathfrak{a})^* is a homomorphism of rings.

Let a1\mathfrak{a}_1 and a2\mathfrak{a}_2 be Lie algebras, ff a homomorphism from a1\mathfrak{a}_1 to a2\mathfrak{a}_2. Every finite dimensional a2\mathfrak{a}_2-module E defines by means of ff an a1\mathfrak{a}_1-module, hence elements of R(a2)\mathscr{R}(\mathfrak{a}_2) and R(a1)\mathscr{R}(\mathfrak{a}_1) that we denote provisionally by [E]2[E]_2 and [E]1[E]_1. By Lemma 3, there exists a unique homomorphism, denoted by R(f)\mathscr{R}(f), from the group R(a2)\mathscr{R}(\mathfrak{a}_2) to the group R(a1)\mathscr{R}(\mathfrak{a}_1) such that R(f)[E]2=[E]1\mathscr{R}(f)[E]_2=[E]_1 for every finite dimensional a2\mathfrak{a}_2-module E. Moreover, R(f)\mathscr{R}(f) is a homomorphism of rings. If U(f) is the homomorphism from U(a1\mathfrak{a}_1) to U(a2\mathfrak{a}_2) extending ff, the following diagram is commutative

R(a2)→R(f)R(a1)↓Tr⁡↓Tr⁡U(a2)∗→tU(f)U(a1)∗. \begin{array}{ccc} \mathscr{R}(\mathfrak{a}_2) & \xrightarrow{\mathscr{R}(f)} & \mathscr{R}(\mathfrak{a}_1)\\ \Big\downarrow\scriptstyle{\operatorname{Tr}} & & \Big\downarrow\scriptstyle{\operatorname{Tr}}\\ U(\mathfrak{a}_2)^* & \xrightarrow{t_{U(f)}} & U(\mathfrak{a}_1)^*. \end{array}

In what follows we take for a\mathfrak{a} the splittable semi-simple Lie algebra g\mathfrak{g}. The ring R(g)\mathscr{R}(\mathfrak{g}) is called the representation ring of g\mathfrak{g}. For all λ∈P++\lambda\in P_{++}, we denote by [λ][\lambda] the class of the simple g\mathfrak{g}-module E(λ\lambda) of highest weight λ\lambda.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.