Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 017Y, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 017Y].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VIII, § 12. Chevalley orders

(i) (ZV)(^{\mathscr{V}}_{\mathbf{Z}}) is a biorder in the bigebra S(V)\mathbf{S}(V), and (ZV)∩V=V(^{\mathscr{V}}_{\mathbf{Z}})\cap V =\mathscr{V}.

(ii) The Z\mathbf{Z}-algebra (ZV)(^{\mathscr{V}}_{\mathbf{Z}}) is generated by the (nh)(^h_n) for h∈V,n∈Nh\in \mathscr{V}, n\in \mathbf{N}.

(iii) If (h1,...,hr)(h_1, . . . , h_r) is a basis of V\mathscr{V}, the elements

(h)(h1)(hr) (h)(h_1)(h_r)

= ⋯\cdots,

nn1nr \mathbf{n}n_1n_r

where n=(n1,...,nr)\mathbf{n}= (n_1, . . . , n_r) belongs to Nr\mathbf{N}^r, form a basis of the Z\mathbf{Z}-module (ZV)(^{\mathscr{V}}_{\mathbf{Z}}).

For m∈Nm\in \mathbf{N}, put Sm(V)=∑i≤mSi\mathbf{S}_m(V) =\sum_{i\leq m}\mathbf{S}^i(V), Sm(V)=∑i≤mSi(V)\mathbf{S}_m(\mathscr{V}) =\sum_{i\leq m}\mathbf{S}^i(\mathscr{V}). By Algebra, Chap. IV, §5, no. 9, Prop. 15 and Remark,

Sm(V)⊂Sm(V)∩(VZ)⊂m1\mathbf{S}_m(\mathscr{V})\subset \mathbf{S}_m(V)\cap (\mathscr{V}\mathbf{Z})\subset m1!Sm(V)\mathbf{S}_m(\mathscr{V})

so (ZV)∩V=V(^{\mathscr{V}}_{\mathbf{Z}})\cap V =\mathscr{V}. Since Sm(V)\mathbf{S}_m(\mathscr{V}) is a lattice in Sm\mathbf{S}_m(V), Sm(V)∩(ZV)\mathbf{S}_m(V)\cap (_{\mathbf{Z}}^{\mathscr{V}}) is also a lattice in Sm(V)\mathbf{S}_m(V). On the other hand, Sm(V)∩(ZV)\mathbf{S}_m(V)\cap (^{\mathscr{V}}_{\mathbf{Z}}) is a direct factor of Sm+1(V)∩(ZV)\mathbf{S}_{m+1}(V)\cap (_{\mathbf{Z}}^{\mathscr{V}}) (since the quotient is torsion-free), hence it admits a complement which is a free Z\mathbf{Z}-module. It follows that (ZV)(^{\mathscr{V}}_{\mathbf{Z}}) is a free Z\mathbf{Z}-module. It is clear that this is a unital order in the algebra S(V)\mathbf{S}(V). Let (un)n∈N(u_n)_{n\in\mathbf{N}} be a basis of the Z\mathbf{Z}-module (ZV)(^{\mathscr{V}}_{\mathbf{Z}}). This is also a basis of the Q\mathbf{Q}-module S(V)\mathbf{S}(V) and, for all

φ∈S(V×V)=S(V)⊗QS(V) \varphi \in \mathbf{S}(V\times V) =\mathbf{S}(V)\otimes_{\mathbf{Q}}\mathbf{S}(V)

there exists a unique sequence (vn)(v_n) of elements of S(V)\mathbf{S}(V) such that φ=∑un⊗vn\varphi =\sum u_n\otimes v_n. As above, identify S(V)\mathbf{S}(V) with A(V∗)A(V^*) and S(V)⊗S(V)\mathbf{S}(V)\otimes \mathbf{S}(V) with A(V∗×V∗)A(V^*\times V^*). If φ∈(ZV×V)\varphi \in (^{\mathscr{V}\times\mathscr{V}}_{\mathbf{Z}}), the polynomial function x→φ(x,y)x \rightarrow \varphi (x, y) belongs to (ZV)(^{\mathscr{V}}_{\mathbf{Z}}) for all y∈V∗y\in \mathscr{V}^*. It follows that vn(y)∈Zv_n(y)\in \mathbf{Z} for all nn and all y∈V∗y\in \mathscr{V}^*, in other words that vn∈(ZV)v_n\in (^{\mathscr{V}}_{\mathbf{Z}}). This proves that the coproduct maps (ZV)(^{\mathscr{V}}_{\mathbf{Z}}) to (ZV)⊗Z(ZV)(_{\mathbf{Z}}^{\mathscr{V}})\otimes_{\mathbf{Z}}(_{\mathbf{Z}}^{\mathscr{V}}). If h∈Vh\in \mathscr{V} and n∈Nn\in \mathbf{N}, then (nh)(_n^h) maps u∈V∗u\in \mathscr{V}^* to the integer (nu(h))(^{u(h)}_n), so (nh)∈(ZV)(^h_n)\in (_{\mathbf{Z}}^{\mathscr{V}}). Assertion (iii) is now obtained by applying Th. 1 to the commutative Lie algebra V, and (ii) follows.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

  • Algebra, Chap. IV, §5, no. 9, Prop. 15 not in this corpus
  • Th. 1
Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.