Bourbaki

Theorem 1

Tag 017W, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 017W].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VIII, § 12. Chevalley orders

Let U\mathscr{U} be a biorder in the bigebra U(g)U(\mathfrak{g}). Let G=U∩g\mathscr{G}=\mathscr{U}\cap \mathfrak{g}, which is an order in the Lie algebra g\mathfrak{g}. Let (xi)i∈I(x_i)_{i\in I} be a basis of G\mathscr{G}. Give I a total order, and assume that we are given, for all n∈NI\mathbf{n}\in \mathbf{N}^I, an element [n][\mathbf{n}] of U\mathscr{U} such that [n]−x(n)[\mathbf{n}]-\mathbf{x}^{(\mathbf{n})} has filtration <∣n∣<|\mathbf{n}| in U(g)U(\mathfrak{g}). Then, the family of the [n][\mathbf{n}] for n∈NI\mathbf{n}\in \mathbf{N}^I is a basis of the Z\mathbf{Z}-module U\mathscr{U}.

For p∈Np\in \mathbf{N}, let Up(g)U_p(\mathfrak{g}) be the set of elements of U(g)U(\mathfrak{g}) of filtration ≤p\leq p; then the images in Up(g)/Up−1(g)U_p(\mathfrak{g})/U_{p-1}(\mathfrak{g}) of the x(n)\mathbf{x}^{(\mathbf{n})} such that ∣n∣=p|\mathbf{n}|=p form a basis of this Q\mathbf{Q}-vector space (Chap. I, §2, no. 7, Th. 1); hence the [n][\mathbf{n}] form a basis of the Q\mathbf{Q}-vector space U(g)U(\mathfrak{g}). It remains to prove the following assertion (in which we put M=NIM =\mathbf{N}^I)::

(*) if u∈U,(an)∈Z(M)u\in \mathscr{U}, (a_{\mathbf{n}})\in \mathbf{Z}^{(M)}, and d∈d\in N --{0}\{0\} are such that

du=∑n∈Man[n](6) du=\sum_{\mathbf{n}\in M}a_{\mathbf{n}}[\mathbf{n}] \tag{6}

then dd divides each ana_{\mathbf{n}}.

For each integer r≥0r\geq 0, introduce the iterated coproduct

ci:U→Tr(U)=U⊗U⊗⋯⊗U c_i:\mathscr{U}\rightarrow \mathbf{T}^r(\mathscr{U}) =\mathscr{U}\otimes \mathscr{U}\otimes \cdots \otimes \mathscr{U}

by definition, c0c_0 is the counit of U,c1=\mathscr{U},c_1= IdU,c2=c_{\mathscr{U}},c_2=c (the coproduct of U\mathscr{U}), and, for r≥2,cr+1r\geq 2,c_{r+1} is defined as the composite p∘(cr⊗1)∘c:p\circ (c_r\otimes 1)\circ c:

U⟶cU⊗ZUc⟶r⊗1Tr(U)⊗ZU⟶pTr+1(U) \mathscr{U}\longrightarrow^c\mathscr{U}\otimes_{\mathbf{Z}}\mathscr{U}^c\longrightarrow^{^r\otimes 1}\mathbf{T}^r(\mathscr{U})\otimes_{\mathbf{Z}}\mathscr{U}\longrightarrow^p\mathbf{T}^{r+1}(\mathscr{U})

where pp is defined by using the multiplication in the algebra T(U)\mathbf{T}(\mathscr{U}). Further, consider the canonical projection π\pi of U\mathscr{U} onto U+=\mathscr{U}^+= Ker c0c_0, and the composite

cr+=Tr(π)∘cr:U→Tr(U+) c^+_r=\mathbf{T}^r(\pi )\circ c_r:\mathscr{U}\rightarrow \mathbf{T}^r(\mathscr{U}^+)

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

  • Chap. I, §2, no. 7, Th. 1 not in this corpus
Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.