Bourbaki

Theorem 3

Tag 018J, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 018J].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VIII, § 12. Chevalley orders

We retain the notations at the beginning of no. 7, and assume that G\mathscr{G} is a Chevalley order in (g,h)(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h}).

(i) U\mathscr{U} is a biorder in U(g)U(\mathfrak{g}).

(ii) Let B be a basis of R, and (Xα)α∈B∪(−B)(X_{\alpha})_{\alpha\in B\cup(-B)} a family of elements of g\mathfrak{g} such that Gα=ZXα\mathscr{G}^{\alpha}=\mathbf{Z}X_{\alpha} for α∈B∪(−B)\alpha \in B\cup (-B). The Z\mathbf{Z}-algebra U\mathscr{U} is generated by the (nh)(^h_n) and the Xα(n)(h∈H,α∈B∪(−B),n∈N)X_{\alpha}^{(n)}(h\in \mathscr{H}, \alpha \in B\cup (-B), n\in \mathbf{N}). If g\mathfrak{g} is semi-simple and H=Q(R∨)\mathscr{H}= Q(R^{\vee}), the Z\mathbf{Z}-algebra U\mathscr{U} is generated by the Xα(n)(α∈B∪(−B),n∈N)X_{\alpha}^{(n)}(\alpha \in B\cup (-B), n\in \mathbf{N}).

(iii) Let B be a basis of R, R+R_+ the corresponding set of positive roots, R−=−R+,n+=∑α∈R+gα,n−=∑α∈R−gαR_-=-R_+,\mathfrak{n}_+=\sum_{\alpha\in R_+}\mathfrak{g}^{\alpha},\mathfrak{n}_-=\sum_{\alpha\in R_-}\mathfrak{g}^{\alpha}. Then,

U=(U∩U(n−)).(U∩U(h)).(U∩U(n+)) \mathscr{U}= (\mathscr{U}\cap U(\mathfrak{n}_-)).(\mathscr{U}\cap U(\mathfrak{h})).(\mathscr{U}\cap U(\mathfrak{n}_+))

Let (hi)i∈I(h_i)_{i\in I} be a basis of H\mathscr{H}. For all α∈R\alpha \in R, let XαX_{\alpha} be a basis of Gα\mathscr{G}^{\alpha}. Give the set I∪RI\cup R a total order (we assume that I∩R=∅I\cap R =\emptyset ). For λ∈I∪R\lambda \in I\cup R and n∈Nn\in \mathbf{N}, put eλ⟨n⟩=(nhλ)e^{\langle n\rangle}_{\lambda}=(^{h_{\lambda}}_n) if λ∈I,eλ⟨n⟩=Xλ(n)\lambda \in I,e^{\langle n\rangle}_{\lambda}=X_{\lambda}^{(n)} if λ∈R\lambda \in R. Then the products ∏λ∈I∪Reλ⟨nλ⟩\prod_{\lambda\in I\cup R}e^{\langle n_{\lambda}\rangle}_{\lambda}, where (nλ)(n_{\lambda}) belongs to NI∪R\mathbf{N}^{I\cup R}, form a basis of the Z\mathbf{Z}-module U\mathscr{U}. The

products ∏λ∈I(nλhλ)\prod_{\lambda\in I}(^{h_{\lambda}}_{n_{\lambda}}), where (nλ)(n_{\lambda}) belongs to NI\mathbf{N}^I, form a basis of the Z\mathbf{Z}-module U∩U(h)\mathscr{U}\cap U(\mathfrak{h}). The products ∏λ∈R+Xλ(nλ)\prod_{\lambda\in R_+}X_{\lambda}^{(n_{\lambda})}, where (nλ)(n_{\lambda}) belongs to NR+\mathbf{N}^{R_+}, form a basis of the Z\mathbf{Z}-module U∩U(n+)\mathscr{U}\cap U(\mathfrak{n}_+).

Let B and (Xα)α∈B∪(−B)(X_{\alpha})_{\alpha\in B\cup(-B)} be as in (ii), and such that [X−α,Xα]=Hα[X_{-\alpha}, X_{\alpha}] =H_{\alpha}. Let U′\mathscr{U}' be the Z\mathbf{Z}-subalgebra of U(g)U(\mathfrak{g}) generated by the (nh)(_n^h) and the Xα(n)X_{\alpha}^{(n)} (h∈H,α∈B∪(−B),n∈N)(h\in \mathscr{H}, \alpha \in B\cup (-B), n\in \mathbf{N}). We have seen in the proof of Th. 2, (i) =⇒=\Rightarrow (ii), that U′\mathscr{U}' is equal to U\mathscr{U} and is a biorder in U(g)U(\mathfrak{g}). This proves (i) and the first assertion of (ii); the second follows from Lemma 4 (ii). Assertion (iii) follows from Th. 1 (no. 3) and Prop. 3 (no. 6).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.