We retain the notations at the beginning of no. 7, and assume that G is a Chevalley order in (g,h).
(i) U is a biorder in U(g).
(ii) Let B be a basis of R, and (Xα)α∈B∪(−B) a family of elements of g such that Gα=ZXα for α∈B∪(−B). The Z-algebra U is generated by the (nh) and the Xα(n)(h∈H,α∈B∪(−B),n∈N). If g is semi-simple and H=Q(R∨), the Z-algebra U is generated by the Xα(n)(α∈B∪(−B),n∈N).
(iii) Let B be a basis of R, R+ the corresponding set of positive roots, R−=−R+,n+=∑α∈R+gα,n−=∑α∈R−gα. Then,
U=(U∩U(n−)).(U∩U(h)).(U∩U(n+))
Let (hi)i∈I be a basis of H. For all α∈R, let Xα be a basis of Gα. Give the set I∪R a total order (we assume that I∩R=∅ ). For λ∈I∪R and n∈N, put eλ⟨n⟩=(nhλ) if λ∈I,eλ⟨n⟩=Xλ(n) if λ∈R. Then the products ∏λ∈I∪Reλ⟨nλ⟩, where (nλ) belongs to NI∪R, form a basis of the Z-module U. The
products ∏λ∈I(nλhλ), where (nλ) belongs to NI, form a basis of the Z-module U∩U(h). The products ∏λ∈R+Xλ(nλ), where (nλ) belongs to NR+, form a basis of the Z-module U∩U(n+).
Let B and (Xα)α∈B∪(−B) be as in (ii), and such that [X−α,Xα]=Hα. Let U′ be the Z-subalgebra of U(g) generated by the (nh) and the Xα(n) (h∈H,α∈B∪(−B),n∈N). We have seen in the proof of Th. 2, (i) =⇒ (ii), that U′ is equal to U and is a biorder in U(g). This proves (i) and the first assertion of (ii); the second follows from Lemma 4 (ii). Assertion (iii) follows from Th. 1 (no. 3) and Prop. 3 (no. 6).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.