Bourbaki

Theorem 4

Tag 018R, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 018R].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VIII, § 12. Chevalley orders

Let E be a finite dimensional g\mathfrak{g}-module. The following conditions are equivalent:

(i) E has an admissible lattice;

(ii) every element of H\mathscr{H} defines a diagonalizable endomorphism of E with integer eigenvalues.

(i) =⇒=\Rightarrow (ii): this follows from Remark 3.

(ii) =⇒=\Rightarrow (i): we assume that condition (ii) is satisfied and prove (i). By Th. 4 of Chap. I, §6, no. 5, we can assume that the elements of c\mathfrak{c} define homotheties of E, and that E is a simple Dg\mathscr{D}\mathfrak{g}-module. Let B be a basis of R, and g=n−⊕h⊕n+\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{n}_-\oplus \mathfrak{h}\oplus \mathfrak{n}_+ the corresponding decomposition of g\mathfrak{g}. Let λ\lambda be the highest weight of the Dg\mathscr{D}\mathfrak{g}-module E, and let e∈Eλe\in E^{\lambda} -- {0}\{0\}. Put E=U.e\mathscr{E}=\mathscr{U}.e. It is clear that U.E⊂E\mathscr{U}.\mathscr{E}\subset \mathscr{E}. Since E is simple, U(g).e=EU(\mathfrak{g}).e= E and hence E\mathscr{E} generates E as a Q\mathbf{Q}-vector space. For h∈Hh\in \mathscr{H} and n∈Nn\in \mathbf{N}, we have (nh)e=(nλ(h))e∈Ze(^h_n)e=(^{\lambda(h)}_n)e\in \mathbf{Z}e, so

(U∩U(h)).e=Ze (\mathscr{U}\cap U(\mathfrak{h})).e=\mathbf{Z}e

Since U(n+).e=0U(\mathfrak{n}_+).e= 0, we have E=(U∩U(n−)).e\mathscr{E}= (\mathscr{U}\cap U(\mathfrak{n}_-)).e by Prop. 3. It now follows from Th. 3 (iii) that E\mathscr{E} is a Z\mathbf{Z}-module of finite type.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.