Bourbaki

Lemma 4

Tag 0182, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0182].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VIII, § 12. Chevalley orders

Let x,y,h∈Ax, y, h\in A be such that

[y,x]=h,[h,x]=2x,[h,y]=−2y(15) [y, x] =h,[h, x] = 2x,[h, y] =-2y \tag{15}

(i) For m,n∈Nm, n\in \mathbf{N}, we have

(n)(m)∑(m−p)(m+n−p−1−h)(n−p) _{(n)(m)}\sum_{(m-p)}(m+n-p-1-h)_{(n-p)}

xyxy = yxyx. (16)

p p
p≥0p\geq 0

(ii) Let A′A' be the Z\mathbf{Z}-subalgebra of A generated by the x(m)x^{(m)} and the y(m)y^{(m)} for m∈Nm\in \mathbf{N}. Then (nh)∈A′(^h_n)\in A' for all n∈Nn\in \mathbf{N}.

Formula (16) can be written in the equivalent form

(n)(m)∑(m−p)(m+n−p−1−h)(n−p) _{(n)(m)}\sum_{(m-p)}(m+n-p-1-h)_{(n-p)}

(ad xx)yy = yx.(17m)yx.(17_m)

p p
p≥1p\geq 1

This is trivial for m=0m= 0. We argue by induction on mm. From (17m)(17_m), we obtain

(m+(m+ 1)(ad x(n)x^{(n)})y(m+1)=y^{(m+1)}= (ad x(n)x^{(n)})y(m).y+y(m)y^{(m)}.y+y^{(m)}.(ad x(n)x^{(n)})yy (18)

(m−p)(m+n−p−1−h)(n−p)(m)− _{(m-p)}(m+n-p-1-h)_{(n-p)(m)}-
=∑yxy+y(n−1−h)x(n1) =\sum yxy+y(n-1-h)x^{(n1)}
p p
p≥1p\geq 1

(§1, no. 1, Lemma 1). Now, applying the same lemma, and then Lemma 3,

we have

(m+n−p−1−h)(n−p) (m+n-p-1-h)_{(n-p)}
xy xy
p p
(m+n−p−1−h)(n−p)−− (m+n-p-1-h)_{(n-p)}-_-

= (yx+(n−p−1−h)x(np1))(yx+ (n-p-1-h)x^{(np1)})

p p
(m+n−p+1−h)(n−p) (m+n-p+ 1-h)_{(n-p)}
=yx =yx
p p
(m+n−p−1−h)−− (m+n-p-1-h)_{--}

+ (n−p−1−h)x(np1)(n-p-1-h)x^{(np1)}.

p p

Inserting this into (18), we obtain

(m+(m+ 1)(ad x(n)x^{(n)})y(m+1)y^{(m+1)}

−(m+n−p+1−h)− _-(m+n-p+ 1-h)_-
=∑(m−p+1)y(mp+1)x(np) =\sum(m-p+ 1)y^{(mp+1)}x^{(np)}
p p
p≥1p\geq 1
−(m+n−p−1−h)−− _-(m+n-p-1-h)_{--}
+∑y(mp)(n−p−1−h)x(np1)+\sum y^{(mp)}(n-p-1-h)x^{(np1)}
p p
p≥1p\geq 1
+y(m)(n−1−h)x(n−1) +y^{(m)}(n-1-h)x^{(n-1)}
−(m+n−p+1−h)− _-(m+n-p+ 1-h)_-
=∑(m−p+1)y(mp+1)x(np)=\sum(m-p+ 1)y^{(mp+1)}x^{(np)}
p p
p≥1p\geq 1
(m−p)(m+n−p−1−h)−− _{(m-p)}(m+n-p-1-h)_{--}

+∑y(n−p−1−h)x(np1)+\sum y(n-p-1-h)x^{(np1)}.

p p

p≥0p\geq 0 Changing pp to p−1p-1 in the second sum, and regrouping the terms, we obtain

(m+(m+ 1)(ad x(n)x^{(n)})y(m+1)=∑p≥1y(m−p+1)Apx(n−p)y^{(m+1)}=\sum_{p\geq 1}y^{(m-p+1)}A_px^{(n-p)} (19)

with

(m+n−p+1−h)(m+n−p−h) (m+n-p+ 1-h)(m+n-p-h)

Ap=(m−p+1)+(n−p−h)A_p= (m-p+ 1)+ (n-p-h).

pp−1 pp-1

Putting z=m+n−p−hz=m+n-p-h, this can also be written as

Ap=p1A_p=p1!(m−p+1)(z+1)z(z−1)...(z−p+2)(m-p+ 1)(z+ 1)z(z-1). . .(z-p+ 2)

+ 1 (z−m)z(z−1)...(z−p+2)(z-m)z(z-1). . .(z-p+ 2)

(p−(p- 1)!

=p1=p1! z(z−1)...(z−p+2)[(m−p+1)(z+1)+p(z−m)]z(z-1). . .(z-p+ 2)[(m-p+ 1)(z+ 1) +p(z-m)]

(z)((m+1)+n−p−1−h) (z)((m+ 1) +n-p-1-h)
=(m+1)=(m+1) = (m+ 1)= (m+ 1)
pp pp

Inserting this into (19), we obtain (17m+1)(17_{m+1}), hence (i).

Assume that (ph)∈A′(^h_p)\in A' for p<np < n. Then, for all P∈Q[T]P\in \mathbf{Q}[T] of degree <n< n such that P(Z)⊂ZP(\mathbf{Z})\subset \mathbf{Z}, we have P(h)∈A′P(h)\in A' (no. 4, Cor. of Prop. 2). Hence, in view of (16) with m=nm=n,

(h)(n−1−h) (h)(n-1-h)

(−1)n(-1)^n =

nn nn
−n−1(2n−p−1−h)−′ ^{n-1}_-(2n-p-1-h)_-'

=−x(n)y(n)+∑y(np)x(np)∈A=-x^{(n)}y^{(n)}+\sum y^{(np)}x^{(np)}\in A ;

p p
p=0p=0

hence (ii) by induction on nn.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.