Bourbaki

Lemma 1

Tag 00XS, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00XS].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VIII, § 1. The Lie algebra sl(2, k) and its representations

Let A be an associative algebra over k,Hk,H and XX elements of A such that [H,X]=2X[H, X] = 2X.

(i) [H,Xn]=2nXn[H, X^n] = 2nX^n for any integer n≥0n\geq 0.

(ii) If ZZ is an element of A such that [Z,X]=H[Z, X] =H, then, for any integer n>0n >0,

[Z,Xn]=nXn−1(H+n−1)=n(H−n+1)Xn−1 [Z, X^n] =nX^{n-1}(H+n-1) =n(H-n+ 1)X^{n-1}

The map T→[H,T]T \rightarrow [H, T] from A to A is a derivation, which implies (i). With the assumptions in (ii),

[Z,Xn]=∑i+j=n−1XiHXj [Z, X^n] =\sum_{i+j=n-1}X^iHX^j
=∑i+j=n−1(XiXjH+Xi2jXj) =\sum_{i+j=n-1}(X^iX^jH+X^i2jX^j)
=nXn−1H+2Xn−1n(n−1)2 =nX^{n-1}H+ 2X^{n-1}\frac{n(n- 1)}{2}
=nXn−1(H+n−1) =nX^{n-1}(H+n-1)

On the other hand, Xn−1(H+n−1)=(H−n+1)Xn−1X^{n-1}(H+n-1) = (H-n+ 1)X^{n-1} by (i). Q.E.D.

Recall that we denote by sl(2,k)\mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{l}(2, k) the Lie algebra consisting of the square matrices of order 2, trace zero, and with entries in kk. This Lie algebra is simple of dimension 3 (Chap. I, §6, no. 7, Example). The canonical basis of sl(2,k)\mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{l}(2, k) is the basis (X+,X−,H)(X_+, X_-, H), where

(01)((01)( 0 0)(10)(1 0 ))

X+=X_+= 0 0 X−=−1X_-=-1 0 H=H= 0 −1-1.

We have

[H,X+]=2X+[H,X−]=−2X−[X+,X−]=−H(1) [H, X_+] = 2X_+[H, X_-] =-2X_-[X_+, X_-] =-H \tag{1}

Since the identity representation of sl(2,k)\mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{l}(2, k) is injective, HH is a semi-simple element of sl(2,k)\mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{l}(2, k) and X+,X−X_+, X_- are nilpotent elements of sl(2,k)\mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{l}(2, k) (Chap. I, §6, no. 3, Th. 3). By Chap. VII, §2, no. 1, Example 4,kH4,kH is a Cartan subalgebra of sl(2,k)\mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{l}(2, k). The map U→−tUU \rightarrow -^tU is an involutive automorphism of the Lie algebra sl(2,k)\mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{l}(2, k), called the canonical involution of sl(2,k)\mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{l}(2, k); it transforms (X+,X−,H)(X_+, X_-, H) into (X−,X+,−H)(X_-, X_+,-H).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.