Bourbaki

Lemma 3

Tag 0181, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0181].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VIII, § 12. Chevalley orders

Let x,h∈Ax, h\in A and λ∈k\lambda \in k be such that (ad hh)x=λxx=\lambda x. For all n∈Nn\in \mathbf{N}, and all P∈k[X]P\in k[X], we have

P(h)x(n)=x(n)P(h+nλ)(12) P(h)x^{(n)}=x^{(n)}P(h+n\lambda ) \tag{12}

Since ad hh is a derivation of A and since (ad hh)xx commutes with xx, we have

(ad hh)xn=nxn−1x^n=nx^{n-1}((ad hh)xx) =nλxn=n\lambda x^n, (13) so

(ad hh)x(n)=nλx(n)x^{(n)}=n\lambda x^{(n)}.

Thus, formula (12) follows from the special case

P(h)x=xP(h+λ)(14) P(h)x=xP(h+\lambda ) \tag{14}

by replacing xx by x(n)x^{(n)} and λ\lambda by nλn\lambda. It suffices to prove (14) when P=XmP = X^m, by induction on mm. It is clear when m=0,1m= 0,1. If (14) is true for P=XmP = X^m, then

hm+1x=h.hmx=hx(h+λ)m=x(h+λ)m+1 h^{m+1}x=h.h^mx=hx(h+\lambda )^m=x(h+\lambda )^{m+1}

which proves (12).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.