2 (i) Let W be a vector subspace of V of dimension d, D the line ⋀dW⊂⋀dV,θ the canonical representation of gl(V) on ⋀V (Chap. III, App.). Let x∈gl(V). Then x(W)⊂W if and only if θ(x)(D)⊂D.
(ii) Let (e1,...,en) be the canonical basis of kn,θ the canonical representation of gl(n,k) on ⋀(kn), and x∈gl(n,k). Then x∈n(n,k) if and only if
θ(x)(en−d+1∧⋯∧en)=0
for 1≤d≤n.
(i) If x(W)⊂W, it is clear that θ(x)D⊂D. Conversely, assume that θ(x)D⊂D. Let u be a non-zero element of D and let y∈W. Then y∧u=0. Since θ(x) is a derivation of ⋀V, this implies
θ(x)y∧u+y∧θ(x)u=0
Now θ(x)u∈ku, so y∧θ(x)u=0 and consequently θ(x)y∧u=0. By Algebra, Chap. III, §7, no. 9, Prop. 13, this implies that θ(x)y∈W, i.e. x(y)∈W, which proves that x(W)⊂W.
(ii) The condition stated in (ii) is clearly necessary for x∈n(n,k). Assume that it is satisfied. By (i), x leaves
2 In this lemma, k can be an arbitrary (commutative) field.
ken−d+1+⋯+ken
stable, and since this holds for d=1,...,n,x is lower triangular. Put
x=(xij)1≤i,j≤n
We have 0=x(en)=xnnen, so xnn=0. Let i<n, and assume that we have proved that xjj=0 for j>i. Then
0=θ(x)(ei∧ei+1∧⋯∧en)=xii(ei∧ei+1∧⋯∧en)
so xii=0. Thus, x∈n(n,k).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.