Bourbaki

Remark

Tag 01VJ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01VJ].

Topologie algébrique, chapter III, § 1. Homotopies, homéotopies

In other words, a contraction of X onto A is a homotopy σ:X×I→X\sigma : X\times \mathbf{I}\rightarrow X having the following properties:

(i) σ(x,0)=x\sigma (x,0) =x for every x∈Xx\in X;

(ii) σ(x,1)∈A\sigma (x,1)\in A for every x∈Xx\in X;

(iii) σ(x,t)=x\sigma (x, t) =x for every x∈Ax\in A and every t∈It\in \mathbf{I}.

For there to exist a contraction of X onto A, it is necessary and sufficient that the canonical injection of A into X be a homotopy of the pair (A,A)(A,A) onto the pair (X,A)(X,A).

Let aa be a point of X. A contraction of X onto the subspace {a}\{a\} is nothing other than a homotopy pointed at aa joining the mapping IdX_X to the constant mapping with image {a}\{a\}. Consequently, X contracts onto {a}\{a\} if and only if X is contractible at aa (Example 3 of III, p. 234).

Let X be a topological space and let A be a subset of X. Let σ\sigma be a contraction of X onto A. The mapping rr of X into A defined by r(x)=σ(x,1)r(x) =\sigma (x,1) is a retraction of X onto A and σ\sigma is a homotopy joining IdX_X to rr. The relations r∘i=r\circ i= IdA_A and i∘r=ri\circ r=r then imply that the mappings ii and rr are homotopies, inverse to one another up to homotopy.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.