The mapping σf: Cyl(f)×I→ Cyl(f) is a strong contraction of Cyl(f) onto its base. Its term is the canonical retraction of Cyl(f) onto its base.
The mapping σf is a homotopy. The relations σf(αf(x,s),0)= αf(x,s) and σf(βf(y),0)=βf(y) imply that the origin of σf is the identity mapping of Cyl(f). Let rf denote the term of σf. The relations
σf(αf(x,s),1)=αf(x,1)=βf(f(x))=(βf∘γf)(αf(x,s))
and σf(βf(y),1)=βf(y)=(βf∘γf)(βf(y)) imply that rf is the canonical retraction βf∘γf of Cyl(f) onto its base.
For (x,s)∈X×I and t∈I, we have
rf(σf(αf(x,s),t))=rf(αf(x,s(1−t)+t))=βf(f(x))=rf(αf(x,s))
For y∈Y and t∈I, we have rf(σf(βf(y),t))=rf(βf(y)). Consequently, σf is a strong contraction of Cyl(f) onto its base.
The mapping σf is called the canonical contraction of the cylinder of f onto its base.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.