Bourbaki

Proposition 6

Tag 01VQ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01VQ].

Topologie algébrique, chapter III, § 1. Homotopies, homéotopies

The mapping σf:\sigma_f: Cyl(ff)×I→\times \mathbf{I}\rightarrow Cyl(ff) is a strong contraction of Cyl(ff) onto its base. Its term is the canonical retraction of Cyl(ff) onto its base.

The mapping σf\sigma_f is a homotopy. The relations σf(αf(x,s),0)=\sigma_f(\alpha_f(x, s),0) = αf(x,s)\alpha_f(x, s) and σf(βf(y),0)=βf(y)\sigma_f(\beta_f(y),0) =\beta_f(y) imply that the origin of σf\sigma_f is the identity mapping of Cyl(ff). Let rfr_f denote the term of σf\sigma_f. The relations

σf(αf(x,s),1)=αf(x,1)=βf(f(x))=(βf∘γf)(αf(x,s)) \sigma_f(\alpha_f(x, s),1) =\alpha_f(x,1) =\beta_f(f(x)) = (\beta_f\circ \gamma_f)(\alpha_f(x, s))

and σf(βf(y),1)=βf(y)=(βf∘γf)(βf(y))\sigma_f(\beta_f(y),1) =\beta_f(y) = (\beta_f\circ \gamma_f)(\beta_f(y)) imply that rfr_f is the canonical retraction βf∘γf\beta_f\circ \gamma_f of Cyl(ff) onto its base.

For (x,s)∈X×I(x, s)\in X\times \mathbf{I} and t∈It\in \mathbf{I}, we have

rf(σf(αf(x,s),t))=rf(αf(x,s(1−t)+t))=βf(f(x))=rf(αf(x,s)) r_f(\sigma_f(\alpha_f(x, s), t)) =r_f(\alpha_f(x, s(1-t) +t)) =\beta_f(f(x)) =r_f(\alpha_f(x, s))

For y∈Yy\in Y and t∈It\in \mathbf{I}, we have rf(σf(βf(y),t))=rf(βf(y))r_f(\sigma_f(\beta_f(y), t)) =r_f(\beta_f(y)). Consequently, σf\sigma_f is a strong contraction of Cyl(ff) onto its base.

The mapping σf\sigma_f is called the canonical contraction of the cylinder of ff onto its base.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.