Bourbaki

Proposition 7

Tag 01VW, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01VW].

Topologie algébrique, chapter III, § 1. Homotopies, homéotopies

With the above notations, the following assertions are equivalent:

(i) The pair (X,A)(X,A) has the homotopy extension property;

(ii) For every topological space Y and every continuous mapping g:g: Cyl(ii)→Y\rightarrow Y, there exists a continuous mapping g′:X×I→Yg': X\times \mathbf{I}\rightarrow Y such that g=g′∘jg=g'\circ j;

(iii) The injection jj has a continuous retraction;

(iv) The mapping jj is strict and there exists a contraction of X×IX\times \mathbf{I} onto the image of jj.

Suppose that the pair (X,A)(X,A) has the homotopy extension property. Let g:g: Cyl(ii)→Y\rightarrow Y be a continuous mapping; put σ=g∘αi\sigma =g\circ \alpha_i and f=g∘βif=g\circ \beta_i. The mapping f:X→f: X\rightarrow Y is continuous and σ:A×I→Y\sigma : A\times \mathbf{I}\rightarrow Y is a homotopy whose end is the mapping f∣Af|A. There therefore exists a homotopy g′:X×I→Yg': X\times \mathbf{I}\rightarrow Y with end ff extending σ\sigma. We have g′∘j(αi(a,s))=g′(a,s)=σ(a,s)=g(αi(a,s))g'\circ j(\alpha_i(a, s)) =g'(a, s) =\sigma (a, s) =g(\alpha_i(a, s)) and g′∘j(βi(x))=g'\circ j(\beta_i(x)) = g′(x,1)=f(x)=g(βi(x))g'(x,1) =f(x) =g(\beta_i(x)) for a∈A,s∈Ia\in A,s\in \mathbf{I} and x∈Xx\in X. Consequently, g′∘j=gg'\circ j=g, whence (ii).

Conversely, suppose that assertion (ii) is satisfied, and let us prove that the pair (X,A)(X,A) has the homotopy extension property. Let Y be a topological space, let f:X→Yf: X\rightarrow Y be a continuous mapping and let σ:A×I→Y\sigma : A\times \mathbf{I}\rightarrow Y be a homotopy whose end is equal to f∣Af|A. There exists a unique continuous mapping g:g: Cyl(ii)→Y\rightarrow Y such that g∘αi=σg\circ \alpha_i=\sigma and g∘βi=fg\circ \beta_i=f (III, p. 238, prop. 4). Any mapping g′:X×I→Yg': X\times \mathbf{I}\rightarrow Y such that g=g′∘jg=g'\circ j is then a homotopy with end ff extending σ\sigma.

The equivalence of assertions (ii) and (iii) is a particular case of lemma 1 of III, p. 235.

Suppose that the injection j:j: Cyl(ii)→X×I\rightarrow X\times \mathbf{I} admits a continuous retraction rr. The mapping jj therefore defines a homeomorphism of Cyl(ii) onto the subspace T=(A×I)∪(X×{1})T = (A\times \mathbf{I})\cup (X\times \{1\}) of X×I(X\times \mathbf{I}(loc. cit.). It is therefore strict.

Put ρ=\rho = pr1∘j∘r_1\circ j\circ r and θ=\theta = pr2∘j∘r_2\circ j\circ r. If x∈Ax\in A or if s=1s= 1, we have ρ(x,s)=x\rho (x, s) =x and θ(x,s)=s\theta (x, s) =s For (x,s)∈X×I(x, s)\in X\times \mathbf{I} and t∈It\in \mathbf{I}, put

σ((x,s),t)=(ρ(x,(1−t)+st),(1−t)s+tθ(x,s)) \sigma ((x, s), t) = (\rho (x,(1-t) +st),(1-t)s+t\theta (x, s))

The mapping σ:(X×I)×I→X×I\sigma : (X\times \mathbf{I})\times \mathbf{I}\rightarrow X\times \mathbf{I} is continuous. For (x,s)∈X×I(x, s)\in X\times \mathbf{I}, we have

σ((x,s),0)=(ρ(x,1),s)=(x,s) \sigma ((x, s),0) = (\rho (x,1), s) = (x, s)

and

σ((x,s),1)=(ρ(x,s),θ(x,s))=j∘r(x,s) \sigma ((x, s),1) = (\rho (x, s), \theta (x, s)) =j\circ r(x, s)

for x∈Xx\in X and t∈It\in \mathbf{I}, we have

σ((x,1),t)=(ρ(x,1),(1−t)+tθ(x,1))=(x,1) \sigma ((x,1), t) = (\rho (x,1),(1-t) +t\theta (x,1)) = (x,1)

whereas, for (x,s)∈A×I(x, s)\in A\times \mathbf{I} and t∈It\in \mathbf{I}, we have

σ((x,s),t)=(x,(1−t)s+ts)=(x,s) \sigma ((x, s), t) = (x,(1-t)s+ts) = (x, s)

Hence σ\sigma is a contraction of X×IX\times \mathbf{I} onto T. This shows that assertion (iii) implies assertion (iv).

The implication (iv)⇒\Rightarrow(iii) is obvious.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.