Let X and Y be topological spaces, let A be a closed subspace of X, let B be a closed subspace of Y. If the pairs (X,A) and (Y,B) possess the homotopy extension property, the same is true of the pair (X×Y,(X×B)∪(A×Y)).
Let φ:X→R+ and σ:φ−1(I)×I→ X, resp. φ′:Y→R+
and σ′:ψ−1(I)×I→Y, satisfy the conditions of assertion (iv) of theorem 1 for the pair (X,A), resp. for the pair (Y,B). Let ψ:X×Y→R+ be the mapping given by (x,y)↦ inf(φ(x),φ′(x)) ; it is continuous; one has also ψ(x,y)=0 for every (x,y)∈X×Y such that x∈A or y∈B. For (x,y,t)∈X×Y×I such that t+ψ(x)⩾1, one has t+φ(x)⩾1 and t+φ′(x)⩾1. Thus one defines a continuous mapping
τ:{(x,y,t)∈X×Y×I∣t+ψ(x)⩾1}→X×Y
by putting τ(x,y,t)=(σ(x,t),σ′(y,t)). For every (x,y)∈X×Y, one has τ(x,y,1)=(σ(x,1),σ′(y,1))=(x,y). If, moreover, ψ(x,y)⩽1, then φ(x)⩽1 or φ′(y)⩽1, so that σ(x,1)∈A or σ′(y,1)∈B; it follows that τ(x,y,1−ψ(x)) belong to (A×Y)∪(X×B). This verifies assertion (iv) of theorem 1, whence the corollary.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.