Bourbaki

Proposition 10

Tag 01WH, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01WH].

Topologie algébrique, chapter III, § 1. Homotopies, homéotopies

Let X be a topological space and let A be a subset of xx. Suppose that there exists a homotopy σ:X×I→X\sigma : X\times \mathbf{I}\rightarrow X with origin IdX_X, constant on A×{1}A\times \{1\} and such that σ(A×I)⊂A\sigma (A\times \mathbf{I})\subset A. Then the canonical mapping ρ\rho of X into X/AX/A is a homotopy equivalence.

Let ff be the terminal mapping of σ\sigma. It is a continuous mapping of X into X, homotopic to IdX_X. It is constant on A; there therefore exists a unique continuous mapping g:X/A→Xg: X/A\rightarrow X such that g∘ρ=fg\circ \rho =f. On the other hand, since σ(A×I)⊂A\sigma (A\times \mathbf{I})\subset A, there exists a mapping σ′\sigma ' of X/A×IX/A\times \mathbf{I} into X/AX/A such that σ′(ρ(x),t)=ρ(σ(x,t))\sigma '(\rho (x), t) =\rho (\sigma (x, t)) for every x∈Xx\in X and every t∈It\in \mathbf{I}. By I, p. 19, prop. 10, the mapping σ′\sigma ' is continuous. It is a homotopy joining the identity mapping of X/AX/A to the mapping ρ∘g\rho \circ g. Consequently, the mappings gg and ρ\rho are homotopy inverses of one another.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.