Proposition 8
Tag 021G, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 021G].
Topologie algébrique, chapter IV, § 2. Groupes de Poincaré des espaces délaçables
Let P be a nonempty Polish topological space and let R be an equivalence relation in P whose graph is a meagre subset of . There exists a continuous injective mapping of the set , endowed with the product topology of the discrete topologies, into P whose image meets each equivalence class with respect to R in at most one point.
Let the space P be endowed with a metric compatible with its topology for which it is complete. Let be an increasing sequence of closed subsets of , with empty interiors, such that the graph of the relation R is contained in the union of the .
Let be the set of nonempty open subsets of P. We shall construct by induction a sequence , where for every , is a mapping of into , satisfying the following properties :
(i) For every , every and every , the closure of the open set is contained in ;
(ii) For every , one has diam();
(iii) For every and every pair of distinct elements of does not meet .
Choose a nonempty open set U of X of diameter and define as the constant mapping with image . Suppose that the mappings have been constructed.
Let be the mapping defined by . By lemma 3 above, applied to the family of open sets for and to the dense open set of , there exists a family of nonempty open sets of P such that for every and such that be empty for every pair of distinct elements of . One then defines the mapping by choosing, for each element , a nonempty open subset of whose diameter is and whose closure is contained in .
For every element of , the sequence of sets is a decreasing sequence of open subsets of X each of which contains the closure of the next and whose diameter tends to 0; the intersection of this sequence of sets is therefore reduced to a point (TG, II, p. 15), which we denote by . If two points of satisfy for , one has . Consequently, the mapping is continuous. Let and be distinct elements of . For such that , the open set is disjoint from , by definition of , hence the pair does not belong to . It follows that and are not equivalent for the relation R. Consequently, is injective and its image meets each equivalence class for R in at most one point. The proposition is thus proved.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.