Bourbaki

Example 2

Tag 0229, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0229].

Topologie algébrique, chapter IV, § 4. Théorie de la descente

Let Y be a topological space, (Vi)i∈I(V_i)_{i\in I} a family of subsets of Y, and for each i∈Ii\in I, let (Zi,pi)(Z_i, p_i) be a ViV_i-space. Let X denote the sum topological space of the family (Vi)i∈I(V_i)_{i\in I} and (Z,p)(Z, p) the X-space sum of the family (Zi)i∈I(Z_i)_{i\in I}. Let f:X→Yf: X\rightarrow Y be the canonical mapping.

The space X×YXX\times_YX is then identified with the sum space of the family (Vi∩(V_i\cap Vj)(i,j)∈I×I(V_j)_{(i,j)\in I\times I}(I, p. 4, Example 5). Let τ\tau be a descent datum relative to ff on (Z,p)(Z, p). For each pair (i,j)∈I×I(i, j)\in I\times I, define a continuous mapping τi,j:pi−1(Vi∩Vj)→pj−1(Vi∩Vj)\tau_{i,j}:\overset{-1}{p_{i}}(V_i\cap V_j)\rightarrow \overset{-1}{p_{j}}(V_i\cap V_j) by z↦τ(z,(pi(z),j))z\mapsto \tau (z,(p_i(z), j)). The family (τi,j)(\tau_{i,j}) satisfies the following properties:

(i) For each i∈Ii\in I, one has τi,i=\tau_{i,i}= IdZi_{Z_i};

(ii) For each pair (i,j)∈I×I,τi,j(i, j)\in I\times I,\tau_{i,j} is an isomorphism of (Vi∩Vj)(V_i\cap V_j)-spaces ;

(iii) For each triple (i,j,k)∈I×I×I(i, j, k)\in I\times I\times I and each z∈pi−1(Vi∩Vj∩Vk)z\in \overset{-1}{p_{i}}(V_i\cap V_j\cap V_k), one has τj,k(τi,j(z))=τi,k(z)\tau_{j,k}(\tau_{i,j}(z)) =\tau_{i,k}(z).

Conversely, every family (τi,j)(\tau_{i,j}) possessing the above properties arises from a unique descent datum relative to ff on (Z,p)(Z, p).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.