Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 022C, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 022C].

Topologie algébrique, chapter IV, § 4. Théorie de la descente

Let X and Y be topological spaces, let f:X→Yf: X\rightarrow Y be a continuous mapping. Suppose that every point of Y possesses a neighbourhood above which there exists a continuous section of the mapping ff. Then every descent datum relative to ff on an X-space is effective.

Let (Z,p)(Z, p) be an X-space and let τ\tau be a descent datum relative to ff on (Z,p)(Z, p). The assertion that τ\tau is an effective descent datum is local in Y, which allows us to suppose that the mapping ff possesses a continuous section ss. Let g:Z→Z/Rτg: Z\rightarrow Z/R_{\tau} and q:Z/Rτ→Yq: Z/R_{\tau}\rightarrow Y denote the canonical mappings, and let h:Z→X×Y(Z/Rτ)h: Z\rightarrow X\times_Y(Z/R_{\tau}) be the mapping given by z↦(p(z),g(z))z\mapsto (p(z), g(z)). The mapping hh is bijective and continuous; it is enough to prove that it is a homeomorphism.

The mapping from Z into Z which, to zz, associates τ(z,s(f(p(z))))\tau (z, s(f(p(z)))) is continuous and maps every element of Z to the unique element z′z' of Z which is equivalent to it for the relation RτR_{\tau} and such that p(z′)p(z') belongs to the image of ss. It therefore defines, by passing to the quotient, a continuous mapping t:Z/Rτ→Zt: Z/R_{\tau}\rightarrow Z which is a section of the mapping gg. In particular, one has f∘p∘t=q∘g∘t=qf\circ p\circ t=q\circ g\circ t=q.

For every (x,u)∈X×Y(Z/Rτ)(x, u)\in X\times_Y(Z/R_{\tau}), one has f(p(t(u)))=f(x)f(p(t(u))) =f(x); let us then put h′(x,u)=τ(t(u),x)h'(x, u) =\tau (t(u), x). The resulting mapping h′h' from X×Y(Z/Rτ)X\times_Y(Z/R_{\tau}) into Z is continuous. For every (x,u)∈X×Y(Z/Rτ)(x, u)\in X\times_Y(Z/R_{\tau}), one has

h(h′(x,u))=(p(h′(x,u)),g(h′(x,u))) h(h'(x, u)) = (p(h'(x, u)), g(h'(x, u)))
=(p(τ(t(u),x)),g(τ(t(u),x))) = (p(\tau (t(u), x)), g(\tau (t(u), x)))
=(x,u) = (x, u)

because τ(t(u),x)\tau (t(u), x) is equivalent to t(u)t(u) for the relation RτR_{\tau}. This proves that the mapping h∘h′h\circ h' is the identity mapping of X×Y(Z/Rτ)X\times_Y(Z/R_{\tau}). For z∈Zz\in Z, one then has t(g(z))=τ(z,s(f(p(z)))t(g(z)) =\tau (z, s(f(p(z))) and f(p(t(g(z))))=f(p(z))f(p(t(g(z)))) =f(p(z)), whence z=τ(t(g(z)),p(z))z=\tau (t(g(z)), p(z)), by definition of the equivalence relation RτR_{\tau}. Thus one has h′(h(z))=zh'(h(z)) =z and h′∘h=h'\circ h= IdZ_Z. The mapping hh is therefore a homeomorphism, which was to be proved.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.