Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 022D, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 022D].

Topologie algébrique, chapter IV, § 4. Théorie de la descente

Let f:X→f: X\rightarrow Y be a continuous mapping, let (Z,p)(Z, p) be an X-space and let τ\tau be a descent datum relative to ff on Z. The equivalence relation RτR_{\tau} is closed if ff is proper; it is open if ff is open.

The mapping τ~:Z×YX→\widetilde{\tau}: Z\times_YX\rightarrow X ×Y\times_Y Z defined by (z,x)↦(z, x)\mapsto (p(z),τ(z,x))(p(z), \tau (z, x)) is a homeomorphism, with inverse mapping (x,z)↦(τ(z,x),p(z))(x, z)\mapsto (\tau (z, x), p(z)). We have τ\tau = pr2∘τ~_2\circ \widetilde{\tau}, where pr2:X×YZ→_2: X\times_YZ\rightarrow Z is the second projection. If ff is proper, pr2_2 is proper; if ff is open, pr2_2 is open (I, p. 17, prop. 8). It follows that τ\tau is proper (resp. open) if ff is. The saturation of a subset A of Z with respect to the relation RτR_{\tau} is the image of A×YXA\times_YX under τ\tau. Consequently, if ff is proper, the saturation of a closed subset is closed; if ff is open, the saturation of an open subset is open.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.