Bourbaki

Proposition 4

Tag 022F, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 022F].

Topologie algébrique, chapter IV, § 4. Théorie de la descente

Suppose that the mapping ff is strict and surjective and that T is a spread Y-space. Then the mapping f∗:CY(T;T′)→Cf(X×YT;X×YT′)f^*:\mathscr{C}_Y(T; T')\rightarrow \mathscr{C}_f(X\times_YT; X\times_YT') is bijective.

Let τ\tau (resp. τ′\tau ') denote the equivalence relation on X×YTX\times_YT (resp. on X×YT′X\times_YT') associated with the canonical descent datum. Since the mapping ff is surjective, the projection pr2:X×YT→T_2: X\times_YT\rightarrow T is surjective and the canonical mapping (X×YT)/Rτ→T(X\times_YT)/R_{\tau}\rightarrow T is bijective. In particular, the mapping f∗f^* is injective. Let us prove that it is surjective. Let φ:X×YT→X×YT′\varphi : X\times_YT\rightarrow X\times_YT' be an X-morphism compatible with the canonical descent data. Then for (x,t)∈X×YT(x, t)\in X\times_YT, one has φ(x,t)=(x,φ(t))\varphi (x, t) = (x, \varphi (t)), where φ‾\overline{\varphi} is a mapping of T into T′T'.

By definition of φ‾\overline{\varphi}, the mapping φ‾∘\overline{\varphi}\circ pr2:X×YT→T′_2: X\times_YT\rightarrow T' is equal to pr2∘φ_2\circ \varphi, and is therefore continuous. Since the mapping ff is surjective and strict and T is a spread Y-space, the projection pr2:X×YT→T_2: X\times_YT\rightarrow T is strict (I, p. 32, remark 3). By proposition 9 of I, p. 18, the mapping φ‾\overline{\varphi} is therefore continuous. It is a Y-morphism such that f∗(φ‾)=φf^*(\overline{\varphi}) =\varphi, which proves the proposition.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.