Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 022H, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 022H].

Topologie algébrique, chapter IV, § 4. Théorie de la descente

Let X and Y be topological spaces and let f:X→Yf: X\rightarrow Y be a continuous mapping. Suppose that the mapping ff is proper and separated, or else open. Every descent datum relative to ff on a spread X-space is effective. Moreover, if ff is surjective, the quotient space is a spread Y-space.

Let (Z,p)(Z, p) be an X-étalé space and let τ\tau be a descent datum relative to ff on (Z,p)(Z, p). Let us denote by RτR_{\tau} the equivalence relation in Z associated with τ\tau, let g:Z→Z/Rτg: Z\rightarrow Z/R_{\tau} be the canonical surjection and let hh denote the mapping of Z into X×Y(Z/Rτ)X\times_Y(Z/R_{\tau}) defined by z↦(p(z),g(z))z\mapsto (p(z), g(z)). It is continuous and bijective; let us prove that it is a homeomorphism.

a) Suppose first that the mapping ff is open.

Let z0z_0 be a point of Z; put x0=p(z0)x_0=p(z_0). Since pp is étale, there exists a neighbourhood U of x0x_0 in X and a continuous section s:U→Zs: U\rightarrow Z of pp over U such that s(x0)=z0s(x_0) =z_0. The mapping p×p:Z×YZ→p\times p: Z\times_YZ\rightarrow X×YXX\times_YX is étale, and the mappings of U×YUU\times_YU into Z×YZZ\times_YZ defined by (x,x′)↦(s(x),s(x′))(x, x')\mapsto (s(x), s(x')) and (x,x′)↦(s(x),τ(s(x),x′))(x, x')\mapsto (s(x), \tau (s(x), x')) are continuous sections of it over U×YYU\times_YY. Since they coincide at every point of U×YUU\times_YU of the form (x,x)(x, x), they therefore coincide on an open neighbourhood V of ΔU\Delta_U contained in U×YUU\times_YU. Let U0U_0 be a neighbourhood of x0x_0 in X such that U0×YU0U_0\times_YU_0 is contained in V. Let (x,u)(x, u) be a point of U0×Yg(s(U0))U_0\times_Yg(s(U_0)); let x′∈U0x'\in U_0 be such that u=g(s(x′))u=g(s(x')). We have therefore s(x)=τ(s(x′),x)s(x) =\tau (s(x'), x), whence Rτ{s(x),s(x′)}R_{\tau}\{s(x), s(x')\} and (x,u)=(x,g(s(x′)))=(x, u) = (x, g(s(x'))) = (x,g(s(x)))=h(s(x))(x, g(s(x))) =h(s(x)).

Since the mapping gg is open (IV, p. 386, prop. 2), the set U0×Yg(s(U0))U_0\times_Yg(s(U_0)) is an open subset of X×Y(Z/Rτ)X\times_Y(Z/R_{\tau}) on which the mapping h−1h^{-1} is equal to the continuous mapping s∘s\circ pr1_1. The mapping hh is therefore a homeomorphism.

b) Suppose now that the mapping ff is proper and separated.

Let z0z_0 be a point of Z; put x0=p(z0)x_0=p(z_0) and y0=f(x0)y_0=f(x_0). The mapping ss given by x↦τ(z0,x)x\mapsto \tau (z_0, x) is a section of pp over f−1(y0)\overset{-1}{f}(y_0).

The set f−1(y0)\overset{-1}{f}(y_0) is compact (TG, I, p. 75, Theorem 1 and I, p. 26, Remark 2), and two distinct points of f−1(y0)\overset{-1}{f}(y_0) have disjoint neighbourhoods in X, since ff is separated (I, p. 25, Proposition 1). By Theorem 2 of I, p. 37, there therefore exists a neighbourhood U0U_0 of f−1(y0)\overset{-1}{f}(y_0) in X and a section s0s_0 of pp over U0U_0 extending ss. The set s0(U0)s_0(U_0) is an open set of Z, since pp is étale (I, p. 30, Corollary 3), and contains the saturated set of {z0}\{z_0\} for the relation RτR_{\tau}. The mapping gg is closed (IV, p. 386, Proposition 2). There then exists an open set V of Z/RτZ/R_{\tau} such that W=g−1(V)∩p−1(U0)W =\overset{-1}{g}(V)\cap \overset{-1}{p}(U_0) is a neighbourhood of z0z_0 contained in s0(U0)s_0(U_0) (I, p. 75, Lemma).

Let now (x,u)∈U0×YV(x, u)\in U_0\times_YV, and let zz be the unique point of Z such that h(z)=(x,u)h(z) = (x, u); by definition, one has z∈Wz\in W. Since W⊂s0(U0)W\subset s_0(U_0), one has z=s0(p(x))z=s_0(p(x)). This shows that the restriction of h−1h^{-1} to the open set U0×YVU_0\times_YV of X×Y(Z/Rτ)X\times_Y(Z/R_{\tau}) is equal to s0∘p∘s_0\circ p\circ pr1_1. Consequently, hh is a homeomorphism.

Thus we have shown that the descent datum τ\tau is effective. The mapping ff is universally strict (I, p. 20, corollary). Under the assumption that ff is surjective, it then follows from Proposition 8 of I, p. 31 that q:Z/Rτ→Yq: Z/R_{\tau}\rightarrow Y is étale.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.