Proposition 5
Tag 022H, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 022H].
Topologie algébrique, chapter IV, § 4. Théorie de la descente
Let X and Y be topological spaces and let be a continuous mapping. Suppose that the mapping is proper and separated, or else open. Every descent datum relative to on a spread X-space is effective. Moreover, if is surjective, the quotient space is a spread Y-space.
Let be an X-étalé space and let be a descent datum relative to on . Let us denote by the equivalence relation in Z associated with , let be the canonical surjection and let denote the mapping of Z into defined by . It is continuous and bijective; let us prove that it is a homeomorphism.
a) Suppose first that the mapping is open.
Let be a point of Z; put . Since is étale, there exists a neighbourhood U of in X and a continuous section of over U such that . The mapping is étale, and the mappings of into defined by and are continuous sections of it over . Since they coincide at every point of of the form , they therefore coincide on an open neighbourhood V of contained in . Let be a neighbourhood of in X such that is contained in V. Let be a point of ; let be such that . We have therefore , whence and .
Since the mapping is open (IV, p. 386, prop. 2), the set is an open subset of on which the mapping is equal to the continuous mapping pr. The mapping is therefore a homeomorphism.
b) Suppose now that the mapping is proper and separated.
Let be a point of Z; put and . The mapping given by is a section of over .
The set is compact (TG, I, p. 75, Theorem 1 and I, p. 26, Remark 2), and two distinct points of have disjoint neighbourhoods in X, since is separated (I, p. 25, Proposition 1). By Theorem 2 of I, p. 37, there therefore exists a neighbourhood of in X and a section of over extending . The set is an open set of Z, since is étale (I, p. 30, Corollary 3), and contains the saturated set of for the relation . The mapping is closed (IV, p. 386, Proposition 2). There then exists an open set V of such that is a neighbourhood of contained in (I, p. 75, Lemma).
Let now , and let be the unique point of Z such that ; by definition, one has . Since , one has . This shows that the restriction of to the open set of is equal to pr. Consequently, is a homeomorphism.
Thus we have shown that the descent datum is effective. The mapping is universally strict (I, p. 20, corollary). Under the assumption that is surjective, it then follows from Proposition 8 of I, p. 31 that is étale.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.