Lemma 2
Tag 022R, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 022R].
Topologie algébrique, chapter IV, § 4. Théorie de la descente
Let us retain the notation and hypotheses of the proposition. Let T be a set endowed with an operation of the groupoid Coeg() relative to a mapping . Then there exists a unique topology on T for which makes T a covering of Y, such that for every class of paths with origin in X and every point of T, one has . In particular, the operation of Coeg() on T factors through an operation of the groupoid .
The uniqueness of such a topology on T follows from Lemma 1 (III, p. 312); let us prove its existence. Endow the set with a law of operation of by putting for every and every arrow with origin in . Since the space X is simply connected, this law of operation of is without local monodromy (III, p. 313, Remark). There therefore exists on the set a unique topology which makes the X-space , pr a covering of X and such that the canonical operation of in this covering coincides with the given operation (III, p. 313, Prop. 3). Let us denote this covering by . Let us prove that the mapping of into Z is a descent datum on Z relative to the mapping . It is enough to verify that it is continuous, the other conditions of Definition 1 of IV, p. 382, being evident.
The mapping is a lifting of the mapping pr to the covering Z of X. Since the space is locally arcwise connected, the space , which is a covering of it, is also locally arcwise connected. By the Corollary (III, p. 269), in order to prove that the mapping is continuous, it is enough to prove that it is arcwise continuous.
Let therefore be a path in and let us prove that the mapping of into Z is continuous. For every , let us denote by and the paths in X defined by and . For every , one thus has , and , where denotes the strict homotopy class of a path III, p. 304, Remark). The mapping is a path in ; by definition of the coequalizer Coeg(), one therefore has and . By definition of the operation of on Z, one therefore has
This shows that is a continuous lifting to Z of the path loc. cit.). Consequently, the mapping is arcwise continuous, hence continuous; it is a descent datum relative to on the X-space Z.
Let denote the equivalence relation defined by the descent datum . Since the mapping is surjective, the mapping pr induces, by passing to the quotient, a bijection of onto T. Let us endow T with the topology deduced from that of by transport of structure, so that is a Y-space. By hypothesis, T is therefore a covering of Y and the diagram
Z T
X Y
is a cartesian square.
Let be a point of Z, a path with origin in X, and let be the continuous lifting of to Z with origin . The path pr is the lifting with origin of the path in Y, so that . This completes the proof of the lemma.
Let us now prove the proposition. Let and be two arrows of Coeg() whose images in are equal. Since the groupoid morphism is the identity on the vertex sets, the arrows and have the same origin and the same target. Let us denote by the origin of ; let T be the set of arrows of Coeg() with origin , and let be the restriction to T of the target mapping. The groupoid Coeg() operates by composition on the right on the set T, relative to . By lemma 2, the actions of and on T are identical. Hence . This proves that the groupoid morphism is injective.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.