Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 022R, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 022R].

Topologie algébrique, chapter IV, § 4. Théorie de la descente

Let us retain the notation and hypotheses of the proposition. Let T be a set endowed with an operation of the groupoid Coeg(ff) relative to a mapping q:T→Yq: T\rightarrow Y. Then there exists a unique topology on T for which qq makes T a covering of Y, such that for every class of paths with origin cc in X and every point tt of T, one has t⋅γ(c)=t⋅f∗(c)t\cdot \gamma (c) =t\cdot f_*(c). In particular, the operation of Coeg(ff) on T factors through an operation of the groupoid ϖ(Y)\varpi (Y).

The uniqueness of such a topology on T follows from Lemma 1 (III, p. 312); let us prove its existence. Endow the set X×YTX\times_YT with a law of operation of ϖ(X)\varpi (X) by putting (x,t)⋅u=(x⋅u,t⋅γ(u))(x, t)\cdot u= (x\cdot u, t\cdot \gamma (u)) for every (x,t)∈X×YT(x, t)\in X\times_YT and every arrow uu with origin xx in ϖ(X)\varpi (X). Since the space X is simply connected, this law of operation of ϖ(X)\varpi (X) is without local monodromy (III, p. 313, Remark). There therefore exists on the set X×YTX\times_YT a unique topology which makes the X-space (X×YT(X\times_YT, pr1)_1) a covering of X and such that the canonical operation of ϖ(X)\varpi (X) in this covering coincides with the given operation (III, p. 313, Prop. 3). Let us denote this covering by (Z,p)(Z, p). Let us prove that the mapping τ:((x1,t),x2)↦(x2,t)\tau : ((x_1, t), x_2)\mapsto (x_2, t) of Z×YXZ\times_YX into Z is a descent datum on Z relative to the mapping ff. It is enough to verify that it is continuous, the other conditions of Definition 1 of IV, p. 382, being evident.

The mapping τ\tau is a lifting of the mapping pr2:Z×YX→X_2: Z\times_YX\rightarrow X to the covering Z of X. Since the space X×YXX\times_YX is locally arcwise connected, the space Z×YXZ\times_YX, which is a covering of it, is also locally arcwise connected. By the Corollary (III, p. 269), in order to prove that the mapping τ\tau is continuous, it is enough to prove that it is arcwise continuous.

Let therefore c~=((c,g),c′)\widetilde{c}= ((c, g), c') be a path in Z×YXZ\times_YX and let us prove that the mapping τ∘c~:t↦(c′(t),g(t))\tau \circ \widetilde{c}:t\mapsto (c'(t), g(t)) of I\mathbf{I} into Z is continuous. For every s∈[0,1]s\in [0,1], let us denote by csc_s and cs′c'_s the paths in X defined by t↦c(st)t\mapsto c(st) and t↦c′(st)t\mapsto c'(st). For every s∈[0,1]s\in [0,1], one thus has c(s)=c(0)⋅[cs]c(s) =c(0)\cdot [c_s], c′(s)=c′(0)⋅[cs′]c'(s) =c'(0)\cdot [c'_s] and (c,g)(s)=(c(0),g(0))⋅[cs](c, g)(s) = (c(0), g(0))\cdot [c_s], where [u][u] denotes the strict homotopy class of a path u(u(III, p. 304, Remark). The mapping t↦(cs(t),cs′(t))t\mapsto (c_s(t), c'_s(t)) is a path in X×YXX\times_YX; by definition of the coequalizer Coeg(ff), one therefore has γ([cs])=γ([cs′])\gamma ([c_s]) =\gamma ([c'_s]) and g(s)=g(0)⋅γ([cs])=g(s) =g(0)\cdot \gamma ([c_s]) = g(0)⋅γ([cs′])g(0)\cdot \gamma ([c'_s]). By definition of the operation of ϖ(X)\varpi (X) on Z, one therefore has

(τ∘c~)(s)=(c′(s),g(s))=(c′(0)⋅[cs′],g(0)⋅γ([cs′])) (\tau \circ \widetilde{c})(s) = (c'(s), g(s)) = (c'(0)\cdot [c'_s], g(0)\cdot \gamma ([c'_s]))
=(c′(0),g(0))⋅[cs′]=(τ∘c~)(0)⋅[cs′] = (c'(0), g(0))\cdot [c'_s] = (\tau \circ \widetilde{c})(0)\cdot [c'_s]

This shows that τ∘c~\tau \circ \widetilde{c} is a continuous lifting to Z of the path c′(c'(loc. cit.). Consequently, the mapping τ\tau is arcwise continuous, hence continuous; it is a descent datum relative to ff on the X-space Z.

Let RτR_{\tau} denote the equivalence relation defined by the descent datum τ\tau. Since the mapping ff is surjective, the mapping pr2:Z→T_2: Z\rightarrow T induces, by passing to the quotient, a bijection of Z/RτZ/R_{\tau} onto T. Let us endow T with the topology deduced from that of Z/RτZ/R_{\tau} by transport of structure, so that (T,q)(T, q) is a Y-space. By hypothesis, T is therefore a covering of Y and the diagram

Z pr2^{pr_2} T

pqpq

X f^f Y

is a cartesian square.

Let (x,t)(x, t) be a point of Z, cc a path with origin xx in X, and let c~\widetilde{c} be the continuous lifting of cc to Z with origin (x,t)(x, t). The path pr2∘c~_2\circ \widetilde{c} is the lifting with origin tt of the path f∘cf\circ c in Y, so that t⋅γ([c])=t\cdot \gamma ([c]) = t⋅[f∘c]=t⋅f∗([c])t\cdot [f\circ c] =t\cdot f_*([c]). This completes the proof of the lemma.

Let us now prove the proposition. Let uu and vv be two arrows of Coeg(ff) whose images in ϖ(Y)\varpi (Y) are equal. Since the groupoid morphism ϖ′(f)\varpi '(f) is the identity on the vertex sets, the arrows uu and vv have the same origin and the same target. Let us denote by yy the origin of uu; let T be the set of arrows of Coeg(ff) with origin yy, and let q:T→Yq: T\rightarrow Y be the restriction to T of the target mapping. The groupoid Coeg(ff) operates by composition on the right on the set T, relative to qq. By lemma 2, the actions of uu and vv on T are identical. Hence u=u= ey⋅u=ey⋅v=ve_y\cdot u=e_y\cdot v=v. This proves that the groupoid morphism ϖ′(f)\varpi '(f) is injective.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.