Bourbaki

Example

Tag 022T, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 022T].

Topologie algébrique, chapter IV, § 4. Théorie de la descente

Here are two examples in which the hypotheses of theorem 1 are satisfied.

1) Let Y be an unlaceable topological space. Let (Ai)i∈I(A_i)_{i\in I} be a locally finite covering of Y by closed sets. Suppose that, for every i∈Ii\in I, the space AiA_i is unlaceable and that, for every pair (i,j)∈I×I(i, j)\in I\times I, the space Ai∩AjA_i\cap A_j is locally path-connected. One may take for X the sum space of the family (Ai)i∈I(A_i)_{i\in I} and for f:X→Yf: X\rightarrow Y the mapping deduced from the family of canonical injections.

2) Let G be a discrete group operating properly in an unlaceable topological space X, put Y=X/GY = X/G and let f:X→Yf: X\rightarrow Y be the canonical mapping. It is open (TG, III, p. 10, lemma 2) and has the path-lifting property by virtue of Theorem 4 of III, p. 287. The space Y is unlaceable by IV, p. 349, Prop. 8, b). By hypothesis, the mapping from G×XG\times X into X×XX\times X given by (g,x)↦(g⋅x,x)(g, x)\mapsto (g\cdot x, x) is proper, hence strict (I, p. 18, Example 2) and its image is X×YXX\times_YX. It then follows from III, p. 261, Prop. 8 that X×YXX\times_YX is locally path-connected.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.