Bourbaki

Remark 7

Tag 024Z, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 024Z].

Théories spectrales, chapter I, § 1. Spectres et caractères

Let A be a unital algebra, R its radical (A, VIII, p. 150, Def. 2), and let φ\varphi be the canonical morphism of A onto B=A/RB = A/R. If x∈Ax\in A, one has SpB(φ(x))=_B(\varphi (x)) = SpA(x)_A(x). In fact, it is enough to prove that if φ(x)\varphi (x) is invertible in B, then xx is invertible in A. Now, if y∈Ay\in A is such that φ(x)φ(y)=φ(y)φ(x)=φ(e)\varphi (x)\varphi (y) =\varphi (y)\varphi (x) =\varphi (e), one has xy∈e+R,yx∈e+Rxy\in e+ R,yx\in e+ R, hence xyxy and yxyx are invertible (A, VIII, p. 151, Th. 1) and consequently xx is invertible. In particular, if x∈Rx\in R, one has SpA(x)={0}_A(x) =\{0\} if A≠{0}A\not=\{0\}.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-6-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.