Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 0259, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0259].

Théories spectrales, chapter I, § 1. Spectres et caractères

Let (xλ)λ∈Λ(x_{\lambda})_{\lambda\in\Lambda} be a family of pairwise commuting elements of A. The full subalgebra generated by (xλ)(x_{\lambda}) is the set of elements of the form R((xλ))R((x_{\lambda})), where R∈K((Xλ))R\in K((X_{\lambda})) runs through the set of rational fractions in which the family (xλ)(x_{\lambda}) is substitutable.

Let B be the full subalgebra of A generated by the family (xλ)(x_{\lambda}), and let us denote by B1B_1 the set of elements of the form R((xλ))R((x_{\lambda})), where R((Xλ))R((X_{\lambda})) is a rational fraction in which (xλ)(x_{\lambda}) can be substituted. Explicitly, B1B_1 is the set of elements of A of the form P((xλ))Q((xλ))−1P((x_{\lambda}))Q((x_{\lambda}))^{-1}, where P,Q∈K[(Xλ)]P,Q\in K[(X_{\lambda})] and Q((xλ))Q((x_{\lambda})) is invertible in A. The set B1B_1 is a unital subalgebra of A containing the family (xλ)(x_{\lambda}). It is a full subalgebra: if P((xλ))Q((xλ))−1P((x_{\lambda}))Q((x_{\lambda}))^{-1} is invertible in A, then P((xλ))P((x_{\lambda})) is invertible in A and the inverse Q((xλ))P((xλ))−1Q((x_{\lambda}))P((x_{\lambda}))^{-1} of P((xλ))Q((xλ))−1P((x_{\lambda}))Q((x_{\lambda}))^{-1} belongs to B1B_1. Hence B⊂B1B\subset B_1. On the other hand, if P,Q∈K[(Xλ)]P,Q\in K[(X_{\lambda})], and if Q((xλ))Q((x_{\lambda})) is invertible in A, then P((xλ))∈BP((x_{\lambda}))\in B and Q((xλ))∈BQ((x_{\lambda}))\in B, hence Q((xλ))−1∈BQ((x_{\lambda}))^{-1}\in B and P((xλ))Q((xλ))−1∈BP((x_{\lambda}))Q((x_{\lambda}))^{-1}\in B, hence B1⊂BB_1\subset B.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-6-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.