Bourbaki

Definition 4

Tag 025A, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 025A].

Théories spectrales, chapter I, § 1. Spectres et caractères

Let A be a commutative unital algebra over K. A unital character is a unital morphism of A into K.

When no confusion can result from this, we shall simply say character instead of unital character. The set of unital characters of A is denoted by X(A)\mathsf{X}(A). If A is the zero algebra, then X(A)\mathsf{X}(A) is empty.

Let A and B be commutative unital algebras over K and hh a unital morphism of A into B. The map χ↦χ∘h\chi \mapsto \chi \circ h of X(B)\mathsf{X}(B) into X(A)\mathsf{X}(A) is denoted by X(h)\mathsf{X}(h). If kk is a morphism of B into a commutative unital algebra, one has X(k∘h)=X(h)∘X(k)\mathsf{X}(k\circ h) =\mathsf{X}(h)\circ \mathsf{X}(k). The map X\mathsf{X}(IdA_A) is the identity map of X(A)\mathsf{X}(A).

If hh is surjective, X(h)\mathsf{X}(h) is a bijection of X(B)\mathsf{X}(B) onto the set of characters of A which vanish on the kernel of hh.

Let (A1,e1),...,(An,en)(A_1, e_1), . . . ,(A_n, e_n) be commutative unital algebras over K and let A be the unital algebra A1×⋯×AnA_1\times \cdots \times A_n, with unit element (e1,...,en)(e_1, . . . , e_n). For each ii, identify AiA_i with an ideal of A and let πi\pi_i be the canonical mapping of A onto AiA_i. Then X(πi)\mathsf{X}(\pi_i) is a bijection of X(Ai)\mathsf{X}(A_i) onto the set Xi\mathsf{X}_i of characters of A vanishing on ∏j≠iAj\prod_{j\not=i}A_j. The sets Xi\mathsf{X}_i are pairwise disjoint. On the other hand, let χ∈X(A)\chi \in \mathsf{X}(A). Since 1=∑χ(ei)1 =\sum\chi (e_i), there exists ii such that χ(ei)≠0\chi (e_i)\not= 0. For every j≠ij\not=i and every y∈Ajy\in A_j, one has χ(ei)χ(y)=χ(eiy)=χ(0)=0\chi (e_i)\chi (y) =\chi (e_iy) =\chi (0) = 0, hence χ(Aj)=0\chi (A_j) = 0. Thus, χ\chi vanishes on ∏j≠iAj\prod_{j\not=i}A_j, so that X(A)\mathsf{X}(A) is the union of the Xi\mathsf{X}_i.

Let B be the unital algebra A1⊗⋯⊗AnA_1\otimes \cdots \otimes A_n. Let hih_i denote the canonical morphism Ai→BA_i\rightarrow B. Then

χ↦(χ∘h1,...,χ∘hn) \chi \mapsto (\chi \circ h_1, . . . , \chi \circ h_n)

is a map from X(B)\mathsf{X}(B) into X(A1)×⋯×X(An)\mathsf{X}(A_1)\times \cdots \times \mathsf{X}(A_n), and

(χ1,...,χn)↦χ1⊗⋯⊗χn (\chi_1, . . . , \chi_n)\mapsto \chi_1\otimes \cdots \otimes \chi_n

is a map from X(A1)×⋯×X(An)\mathsf{X}(A_1)\times \cdots \times \mathsf{X}(A_n) into X(B)\mathsf{X}(B). One verifies that these maps are reciprocal bijections, by means of which one identifies X(B)\mathsf{X}(B) with X(A1)×⋯×X(An)\mathsf{X}(A_1)\times \cdots \times \mathsf{X}(A_n).

Let A be a commutative unital algebra over K. Let Y be the set of ideals of codimension 1 of A. For every χ∈X(A)\chi \in \mathsf{X}(A), one has Ker(χ\chi )∈Y\in Y. The mapping χ↦\chi \mapsto Ker(χ\chi ) is a bijection of X(A)\mathsf{X}(A) onto Y. In fact, if I∈YI\in Y, there exists a unique isomorphism of the unital K-algebra A/IA/I onto K and the composite morphism

A⟶A/I⟶K A\longrightarrow A/I\longrightarrow K

is the unique character of A with kernel I.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-6-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.