Bourbaki

Definition 6

Tag 025C, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 025C].

Théories spectrales, chapter I, § 1. Spectres et caractères

Let A be a commutative algebra over K. A character of A is, by definition, an algebra morphism of A into K.

The set of characters of A will be denoted by X′(A)\mathsf{X}'(A).

The zero mapping is an algebra morphism. If A has a unit element ee, a nonzero algebra morphism of A into K is unital, that is to say, is a unital character of K in the sense of Definition 4: indeed, in order that χ∈X′(A)\chi \in \mathsf{X}'(A) be nonzero, it is necessary and sufficient that χ(e)=1\chi (e) = 1.

We shall put X(A)=X′(A)−{0}\mathsf{X}(A) =\mathsf{X}'(A)-\{0\}; from the foregoing, this notation is compatible with that introduced when A is unital.

If h:A→Bh: A\rightarrow B is a morphism of commutative algebras, the mapping χ↦χ∘h\chi \mapsto \chi \circ h is a mapping X′(h):X′(B)→X′(A)\mathsf{X}'(h) :\mathsf{X}'(B)\rightarrow \mathsf{X}'(A). It maps 0 to 0. If k:B→Ck: B\rightarrow C is a morphism of commutative algebras, then one has X′(k∘h)=X′(h)∘X′(k)\mathsf{X}'(k\circ h) =\mathsf{X}'(h)\circ \mathsf{X}'(k). If hh is surjective, X′(h)\mathsf{X}'(h) is a bijection of X′(B)\mathsf{X}'(B) onto the set of characters of A vanishing on the kernel of hh. Let A1,...,AnA_1, . . . ,A_n be commutative algebras, A=A1×⋯×AnA = A_1\times \cdots \times A_n and π:A→Ai\pi : A\rightarrow A_i the canonical morphism; then X′(πi)\mathsf{X}'(\pi_i) is a bijection of X′(Ai)\mathsf{X}'(A_i) onto a subset Xi′\mathsf{X}'_i of X′(A)\mathsf{X}'(A), namely the set of characters of A vanishing on ∏j≠iAj\prod_{j\not=i}A_j; one sees as in No.o6^o6 that X′(A)\mathsf{X}'(A) is the union

of the Xi′\mathsf{X}'_i; on the other hand, Xi′∩Xj′={0}\mathsf{X}'_i\cap \mathsf{X}'_j=\{0\} for i≠ji\not=j; in particular the Xi′−{0}\mathsf{X}'_i-\{0\} form a partition of X′(A)−{0}=X(A)\mathsf{X}'(A)-\{0\}=\mathsf{X}(A).

For every x∈Ax\in A, let GA′(x)\mathscr{G}'_A(x), or simply G′(x)\mathscr{G}'(x), be the mapping χ↦χ(x)\chi \mapsto \chi (x) of X′(A)\mathsf{X}'(A) into K. The mapping G′\mathscr{G}' is a morphism of A into the algebra A1A_1 of mappings X′(A)→K\mathsf{X}'(A)\rightarrow K vanishing at 0. Let B be a commutative algebra, B1B_1 the algebra of mappings X′(B)→\mathsf{X}'(B)\rightarrow K vanishing at 0, and hh a morphism of A into B; then X′(h)\mathsf{X}'(h) defines a morphism h1:A1→B1h_1: A_1\rightarrow B_1, and one has h1∘GA′=GB′∘hh_1\circ \mathscr{G}'_A=\mathscr{G}'_B\circ h. One denotes by GA(x)\mathscr{G}_A(x), or simply G(x)\mathscr{G}(x), the restriction of GA′(x)\mathscr{G}'_A(x) to X(A)\mathsf{X}(A), and calls it the Gelfand transform of xx.

Let A~\widetilde{A} be the unital algebra deduced from A by adjunction of a unit element. By restriction, every character of A~\widetilde{A} defines a character of A; conversely, every character of A extends in a unique way to a character of A~\widetilde{A}. This defines a canonical bijection of X′(A)\mathsf{X}'(A) onto X(A~)\mathsf{X}(\widetilde{A}), by which these two sets are identified. The character 0 of A is identified with the unique character of A~\widetilde{A} with kernel A.

If x∈Ax\in A and χ∈X′(A)\chi \in \mathsf{X}'(A), one has χ(x)∈\chi (x)\in SpA~(x)_{\widetilde{A}}(x), hence χ(x)∈\chi (x)\in SpA′(x)'_A(x).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-6-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.