Let a=(a1,...,an)∈An. There exist infinitely differentiable mappings v1,...,vn of Cn− Spn(a) into A such that
(z1−a1)v1(z)+⋯+(zn−an)vn(z)=1
for every z=(z1,...,zn)∈Cn− Spn(a).
Let w=(w1,...,wn)∈Cn− Spn(a). By definition of the simultaneous spectrum, there exist b1,...,bn in A such that
(w1−a1)b1+⋯+(wn−an)bn=1
(I, p. 41, no6). There exists an open neighbourhood Ww of w such that the element (z1−a1)b1+⋯+(zn−an)bn of A is invertible if z=(z1,...,zn) belongs to Ww. For every integer j such that 1⩽j⩽n and every z in Ww, let
uj(z)=bj(i=1∑n(zi−ai)bi)−1
The functions u1,u2,...,un from Ww into A thus defined are infinitely differentiable in Ww, and we have
(z1−a1)u1(z)+⋯+(zn−an)un(z)=1
for every z in Ww.
Since the family (Ww)w∈Cn−Spn(a) is an open covering of Cn− Spn(a), there exists a locally finite open covering W=(Wλ)λ∈L (TG, I, p. 70, th. 5) and, for every λ∈L, functions u1λ,...,unλ, with values in A, defined and infinitely differentiable in Wλ, such that (z1−a1)u1λ(z)+⋯+(zn−an)unλ(z)=1 for every z in Wλ. Let (fλ)λ∈L be a partition of unity subordinate to the covering W formed by infinitely differentiable functions (VAR, R1, p. 40, 5.3.6). Let i be an integer such that 1⩽i⩽n. For every λ∈L, let uiλ′ be the mapping from Cn− Spn(a) into A obtained by extending by 0 the function fλuiλ in (Cn− Spn(a))−Wλ. The functions uiλ′ are infinitely differentiable. The family (Supp(uiλ′))λ∈L being locally finite, the function vi=∑λ∈Luiλ′ is defined and infinitely differentiable in
Cn− Spn(a).
Let z∈Cn− Spn(a). Denote by L′ the finite set of the λ∈L such that z∈Wλ. Then
i=1∑n(zi−ai)vi(z)=λ∈L′∑i=1∑n(zi−ai)uiλ′(z)
=λ∈L′∑fλ(z)i=1∑n(zi−ai)uiλ(z)=(λ∈L′∑fλ(z))⋅1=1
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.