Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 029Z, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 029Z].

Théories spectrales, chapter I, § 4. Calcul fonctionnel holomorphe

Let a=(a1,...,an)∈An\boldsymbol{a}= (a_1, . . . , a_n)\in A^n. There exist infinitely differentiable mappings v1,...,vnv_1, . . . , v_n of Cn−\mathbf{C}^n- Spn(a)^n(\boldsymbol{a}) into A such that

(z1−a1)v1(z)+⋯+(zn−an)vn(z)=1 (z_1-a_1)v_1(\boldsymbol{z}) +\cdots + (z_n-a_n)v_n(\boldsymbol{z}) = 1

for every z=(z1,...,zn)∈Cn−\boldsymbol{z}= (z_1, . . . , z_n)\in \mathbf{C}^n- Spn(a)^n(\boldsymbol{a}).

Let w=(w1,...,wn)∈Cn−\boldsymbol{w}= (w_1, . . . , w_n)\in \mathbf{C}^n- Spn(a)^n(\boldsymbol{a}). By definition of the simultaneous spectrum, there exist b1,...,bnb_1, . . . , b_n in A such that

(w1−a1)b1+⋯+(wn−an)bn=1 (w_1-a_1)b_1+\cdots + (w_n-a_n)b_n= 1

(I, p. 41, no6^o6). There exists an open neighbourhood WwW_{\boldsymbol{w}} of w\boldsymbol{w} such that the element (z1−a1)b1+⋯+(zn−an)bn(z_1-a_1)b_1+\cdots + (z_n-a_n)b_n of A is invertible if z=(z1,...,zn)\boldsymbol{z}= (z_1, . . . , z_n) belongs to WwW_{\boldsymbol{w}}. For every integer jj such that 1⩽j⩽n1\leqslant j\leqslant n and every z\boldsymbol{z} in WwW_{\boldsymbol{w}}, let

uj(z)=bj(∑i=1n(zi−ai)bi)−1 u_j(\boldsymbol{z}) =b_j(\sum_{i=1}^n(z_i-a_i)b_i)^{-1}

The functions u1,u2,...,unu_1, u_2, . . . , u_n from WwW_{\boldsymbol{w}} into A thus defined are infinitely differentiable in WwW_{\boldsymbol{w}}, and we have

(z1−a1)u1(z)+⋯+(zn−an)un(z)=1 (z_1-a_1)u_1(\boldsymbol{z}) +\cdots + (z_n-a_n)u_n(\boldsymbol{z}) = 1

for every z\boldsymbol{z} in WwW_{\boldsymbol{w}}.

Since the family (Ww)w∈Cn−Spn(a)(W_{\boldsymbol{w}})_{\boldsymbol{w}\in\mathbf{C}^{n-}Sp^n(\boldsymbol{a})} is an open covering of Cn−\mathbf{C}^n- Spn(a)^n(\boldsymbol{a}), there exists a locally finite open covering W=(Wλ)λ∈L\mathscr{W}= (W_{\lambda})_{\lambda\in L} (TG, I, p. 70, th. 5) and, for every λ∈L\lambda \in L, functions u1λ,...,unλu_{1\lambda}, . . . , u_{n\lambda}, with values in A, defined and infinitely differentiable in WλW_{\lambda}, such that (z1−a1)u1λ(z)+⋯+(zn−an)unλ(z)=1(z_1-a_1)u_{1\lambda}(\boldsymbol{z}) +\cdots + (z_n-a_n)u_{n\lambda}(\boldsymbol{z}) = 1 for every z\boldsymbol{z} in WλW_{\lambda}. Let (fλ)λ∈L(f_{\lambda})_{\lambda\in L} be a partition of unity subordinate to the covering W\mathscr{W} formed by infinitely differentiable functions (VAR, R1, p. 40, 5.3.6). Let ii be an integer such that 1⩽i⩽n1\leqslant i\leqslant n. For every λ∈L\lambda \in L, let uiλ′u'_{i\lambda} be the mapping from Cn−\mathbf{C}^n- Spn(a)^n(\boldsymbol{a}) into A obtained by extending by 0 the function fλuiλf_{\lambda}u_{i\lambda} in (Cn−(\mathbf{C}^n- Spn(a))−Wλ^n(\boldsymbol{a}))-W_{\lambda}. The functions uiλ′u'_{i\lambda} are infinitely differentiable. The family (Supp(uiλ′u'_{i\lambda}))λ∈L_{\lambda\in L} being locally finite, the function vi=∑λ∈Luiλ′v_i=\sum_{\lambda\in L}u'_{i\lambda} is defined and infinitely differentiable in

Cn−\mathbf{C}^n- Spn(a)^n(\boldsymbol{a}).

Let z∈Cn−\boldsymbol{z}\in \mathbf{C}^n- Spn(a)^n(\boldsymbol{a}). Denote by L′L' the finite set of the λ∈L\lambda \in L such that z∈Wλ\boldsymbol{z}\in W_{\lambda}. Then

∑i=1n(zi−ai)vi(z)=∑λ∈L′∑i=1n(zi−ai)uiλ′(z) \sum_{i=1}^n(z_i-a_i)v_i(\boldsymbol{z}) =\sum_{\lambda\in L'}\sum_{i=1}^n(z_i-a_i)u'_{i\lambda}(\boldsymbol{z})
=∑λ∈L′fλ(z)∑i=1n(zi−ai)uiλ(z)=(∑λ∈L′fλ(z))⋅1=1 =\sum_{\lambda\in L'}f_{\lambda}(\boldsymbol{z})\sum_{i=1}^n(z_i-a_i)u_{i\lambda}(\boldsymbol{z}) =(\sum_{\lambda\in L'}f_{\lambda}(\boldsymbol{z}))\cdot 1 = 1

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5-mini, gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.