Proposition 1
Tag 02A5, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02A5].
Théories spectrales, chapter I, § 4. Calcul fonctionnel holomorphe
Let be an element of A, let U be an open neighbourhood of Sp(), and let . Let V be a compact neighbourhood of Sp() contained in U and such that V is a piece of .
Then is continuous on , the differential form is integrable on , and one has
Let be a mapping of into , indefinitely differentiable, equal to 1 in a neighbourhood of Sp() and with compact support contained in the interior of V (lemma 1 of I, p. 52). Let be a mapping of into A such that is adapted to cf. example 3 of I, p. 53). The associated differential form is . We get since is holomorphic. Moreover, on the boundary of V. On the other hand, the differential form is of class on U. Hence
by formula (5) and Stokes's formula for the piece V (VAR, R2, p. 47, 11.2.3).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.