Lemma 8
Tag 02A7, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02A7].
Théories spectrales, chapter I, § 4. Calcul fonctionnel holomorphe
Let U be an open set in Cn. Let ω1 be a continuous differential form of degree n in U with compact support and with values in A (resp. ω2 a continuous differential form of degree 2 in C with compact support and with values in C). Let us denote by π1 and π2 the canonical projections of U×C onto U and C. The differential form π1∗ω1∧π2∗ω2 on U×C is continuous with compact support and with values in A. We have
∫U×Cπ1∗ω1∧π2∗ω2=(∫Cω2)((∫Uω1)
Let μn be the Lebesgue measure on Cn and μ1 the Lebesgue measure on C. There exist ψ1∈K(U;A) and ψ2∈K(C) such that the vector measure associated with ω1 is equal to ψ1⋅μn, and the vector measure associated with ω2 is equal to ψ2⋅μ1. The vector measure associated with the differential form π1∗ω1∧π2∗ω2 is (ψ1⊗ψ2)⋅μn⊗μ1.
Let ℓ be a continuous linear form on A. After INT, VI, §2, no2, definition 2 and the definition of the product measure (INT, III, §4, no1, definition 1), it follows that
ℓ(∫U×Cπ1∗ω1∧π2∗ω2)=∫U×Cℓ∘(ψ1⊗ψ2)μn⊗μ1
=∫ψ2(z)ℓ(ψ1(x))dμn(x)dμ1(z)
=(∫CU×Cψ2(z)dμ1(z))(∫Uℓ(ψ1(x))dμn(x))
=(∫Cψ2μ1)ℓ(∫Uψ1μn)
whence the result (INT VI, loc. cit.).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.