Let a=(a1,...,an)∈An. Let p∈N and a′ = (an+1,...,an+p)∈Ap. Then we have Θ(a,a′)∘πn,n+p∗=Θa. In particular, we have Θa(1)=1.
Since one has πn,n+p=πn,n+1∘⋯∘πn+p−1,n+p, it is enough to prove the first assertion when p=1, which we henceforth suppose. We write simply π=πn,n+1. It is then enough to prove that, for every open neighbourhood U of Spn(a), and every function f∈O(U;A), one has Θ(a,an+1)(f∘π)=Θa(f). Let g=f∘π. Let h (resp. h′) be a mapping of Cn into C (resp. of C into C), indefinitely differentiable, equal to 1 in a neighbourhood of Spn(a) (resp. of Sp(a′)), with compact support contained in U (resp. in C). There exist mappings (u1,...,un) of Cn into A, indefinitely differentiable, such that the sequence (h,u1,...,un) is adapted to a (lemma 3 of I, p. 54), and an indefinitely differentiable mapping un+1 of C into A such that the pair (h′,un+1) is adapted to an+1(loc. cit.)
For z∈Cn and zn+1∈C, write h′′(z,zn+1)=h(z)h′(zn+1) and un+1′′(z,zn+1)=h(z)un+1(zn+1). The functions h′′ and un+1′′ are indefinitely differentiable in Cn+1. The function h′′ is equal to 1 in a neighbourhood of Spn+1(a,an+1), and has compact support contained in U×C. For every w=(z,zn+1)∈Cn+1, one has
(z1−a1)(u1∘π)(w)+⋯+(zn−an)(un∘π)(w)
+(zn+1−an+1)un+1′′(w)=1−h(z)+h(z)(1−h′(zn+1))
=1−h′′(w)
which proves that the sequence (h′′,u1∘π,...,un∘π,un+1′′) is adapted to (a,an+1). Let ω be the associated differential form.
The differential form du1∧dz1∧⋯∧dun∧dzn∧dh on Cn is of degree 2n+1, hence is zero. Therefore
ω=d(u1∘π)∧dz1∧⋯∧d(un∘π)∧dzn∧dun+1′′∧dzn+1
=(h∘π)d(u1∘π)∧dz1∧⋯∧d(un∘π)∧dzn∧dun+1∧dzn+1
Since g=f∘π, formula (5) and lemma 8 imply
Θa,a′(g)= (2(niπ+ 1)!)n+1∫U×Cgω= (2(niπ+ 1)!)n+1(∫Cdun+1∧dzn+1)
×(∫Ufhdu1∧dz1∧⋯∧dun∧dzn)
On the one hand, one has
∫Cdun+1∧dzn+1=2iπΘan+1C(1)=2iπ⋅1
by corollary 5. On the other hand, part c) of lemma 4 of I, p. 54 and the fact that the integral of a closed form is zero (VAR, R2, p. 48, 11.2.4) imply
(n+1)∫Ufhdu1∧dz1∧⋯∧dun∧dzn=
∫Ufdu1∧dz1∧⋯∧dun∧dzn=(2iπn!)nΘa(f).
Thus one obtains
Θa,a′(g)= (2(niπ+ 1)!)n+1×((2niπ+ 1)!)nΘa(f)×2iπ=Θa(f).
Finally, the formula Θa(1)=1 results from the foregoing and from the corollary of Prop. 1.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.