Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 02AA, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02AA].

Théories spectrales, chapter I, § 4. Calcul fonctionnel holomorphe

Let ϱ1,...,ϱn\varrho_1, . . . , \varrho_n be real numbers >0>0 and let U⊂CnU\subset \mathbf{C}^n be the polydisc product of the open discs with center 0 and radius ϱi\varrho_i. Let

∑c(k1,...,kn)X1k1⋯Xnkn∈A[[X1,...,Xn]] \sum c(k_1, . . . , k_n)X^{k_1}_1\cdots X^{k_n}_n\in A[[X_1, . . . ,X_n]]
(k1,...,kn)∈Nn(k_1,...,k_n)\in \mathbf{N}^n

be a formal series with coefficients in A. Suppose that this series converges in U, and let ff denote the holomorphic function in U of which it is the sum.

Let a=(a1,...,an)∈An\boldsymbol{a}= (a_1, . . . , a_n)\in A^n be such that ϱ(ai)<ϱi\varrho (a_i)< \varrho_i for 1⩽i⩽n1\leqslant i\leqslant n. Then Spn(a)⊂U^n(\boldsymbol{a})\subset U, the family (c(k1,...,kn)a1k1⋯ankn)(c(k_1, . . . , k_n)a^{k_1}_1\cdots a^{k_n}_n) of elements of A is absolutely summable, and

Θa(f)=∑c(k1,...,kn)a1k1⋯ankn \Theta_{\boldsymbol{a}}(f) =\sum c(k_1, . . . , k_n)a^{k_1}_1\cdots a^{k_n}_n
(k1,...,kn)∈Nn(k_1,...,k_n)\in \mathbf{N}^n

For every character χ\chi of A and every integer ii such that 1⩽i⩽n1\leqslant i\leqslant n, one has ∣χ(ai)∣⩽ϱ(ai)<ϱi|\chi (a_i)|\leqslant \varrho (a_i)< \varrho_i, hence Spn(a)⊂U^n(\boldsymbol{a})\subset U by definition of the simultaneous spectrum. Let z1,...,znz_1, . . . , z_n be the restrictions to U of the coordinate functions on Cn\mathbf{C}^n. Then the family (c(k1,...,kn)z1k1⋯znkn)(c(k_1, . . . , k_n)z_1^{k_1}\cdots z^{k_n}_n) is summable in O(U;A)\mathscr{O}(U; A) and has sum ff. In view of lemma 10 and the continuity of the mapping ΘaU\Theta^U_{\boldsymbol{a}}, the family (c(k1,...,kn)a1k1...ankn)(c(k_1, . . . , k_n)a^{k_1}_1. . . a^{k_n}_n) is therefore summable in A and has sum Θa(f)\Theta_{\boldsymbol{a}}(f). For 1⩽i⩽n1\leqslant i\leqslant n, let λi\lambda_i be a real number such that ϱ(ai)<λi<ϱi\varrho (a_i)< \lambda_i< \varrho_i. There exists Mi<+∞M_i<+\infty such that ∥aik∥⩽Miλik\|a^k_i\|\leqslant M_i\lambda^k_i for every integer k⩾0k\geqslant 0. One then has

∑∥c(k1,...,kn)∥∥a1k1⋯ankn∥⩽ \sum\|c(k_1, . . . , k_n)\| \|a^{k_1}_1\cdots a^{k_n}_n\|\leqslant
(k1,...,kn)∈Nn(k_1,...,k_n)\in \mathbf{N}^n M1⋯Mn∑∥c(k1,...,kn)∥λ1k1⋯λnknM_1\cdots M_n\sum\|c(k_1, . . . , k_n)\|\lambda^{k_1}_1\cdots \lambda^{k_n}_n

(k1,...,kn)∈Nn(k_1,...,k_n)\in \mathbf{N}^n which is finite by hypothesis, hence the family (c(k1,...,kn)a1k1⋯ankn)(c(k_1, . . . , k_n)a^{k_1}_1\cdots a^{k_n}_n) is absolutely summable.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5-mini, gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.