Let B be a commutative unital Banach algebra and φ a continuous unital morphism of A into B. Let a=(a1,...,an)∈An. Put b=(φ(a1),...,φ(an)), so that SpBn(b)⊂ SpAn(a). For every f∈O(SpAn(a);A), one has
φ(Θa(f))=Θb(φ∗(f))
where φ∗(f) denotes the germ of φ∘f in a neighbourhood of SpBn(b).
It is enough to prove that for every open neighbourhood U of SpAn(a) and every f∈O(U;A), one has φ(Θa(f))=Θb(φ∘f), where φ∘f∈O(U;B). Let (h,u1,...,un) be a sequence adapted to a, where the support of h is contained in U (lemma 1 of I, p. 52 and lemma 3 of I, p. 54). Let ω denote the associated differential form. For every z∈Cn, one has
j=1∑n(zj−bj)φ(ui(z))=φ(j=1∑n(zj−aj)uj(z))=1−h(z)
so that the sequence (h,φ∘u1,...,φ∘un) is adapted to b. Let ω′ denote the associated differential form. Let μ denote Lebesgue measure on Cn. Let f∈O(U;A). Let us write ψ⋅μ for the vector measure associated with the differential form fω. The vector measure associated with the differential form
(φ∘f)ω′=(φ∘f)d(φ∘u1)∧dz1∧⋯∧d(φ∘un)∧dzn
is equal to (φ∘ψ)⋅μ. Therefore, by formula (5), and INT, VI, §2, no2, prop. 2, one has
Θb(φ∘f)=(2iπn!)n∫U(φ∘f)μ=(2niπ!)nφ(∫Uψμ)=φ(Θa(f)),
as was required.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.