Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 02AC, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02AC].

Théories spectrales, chapter I, § 4. Calcul fonctionnel holomorphe

Let B be a commutative unital Banach algebra and φ\varphi a continuous unital morphism of A into B. Let a=(a1,...,an)∈An\boldsymbol{a}= (a_1, . . . , a_n)\in A^n. Put b=(φ(a1),...,φ(an))\boldsymbol{b}= (\varphi (a_1), . . . , \varphi (a_n)), so that SpBn(b)⊂^n_B(\boldsymbol{b})\subset SpAn(a)^n_A(\boldsymbol{a}). For every f∈Of\in \mathscr{O}(SpAn(a);A^n_A(\boldsymbol{a}); A), one has

φ(Θa(f))=Θb(φ∗(f)) \varphi (\Theta_{\boldsymbol{a}}(f)) = \Theta_{\boldsymbol{b}}(\varphi_*(f))

where φ∗(f)\varphi_*(f) denotes the germ of φ∘f\varphi \circ f in a neighbourhood of SpBn(b)^n_B(\boldsymbol{b}).

It is enough to prove that for every open neighbourhood U of SpAn(a)^n_A(\boldsymbol{a}) and every f∈O(U;A)f\in \mathscr{O}(U; A), one has φ(Θa(f))=Θb(φ∘f)\varphi (\Theta_{\boldsymbol{a}}(f)) = \Theta_{\boldsymbol{b}}(\varphi \circ f), where φ∘f∈O(U;B)\varphi \circ f\in \mathscr{O}(U; B). Let (h,u1,...,un)(h, u_1, . . . , u_n) be a sequence adapted to a\boldsymbol{a}, where the support of hh is contained in U (lemma 1 of I, p. 52 and lemma 3 of I, p. 54). Let ω\omega denote the associated differential form. For every z∈Cn\boldsymbol{z}\in \mathbf{C}^n, one has

∑j=1n(zj−bj)φ(ui(z))=φ(∑j=1n(zj−aj)uj(z))=1−h(z) \sum_{j=1}^n(z_j-b_j)\varphi (u_i(\boldsymbol{z})) =\varphi (\sum_{j=1}^n(z_j-a_j)u_j(\boldsymbol{z}))= 1-h(\boldsymbol{z})

so that the sequence (h,φ∘u1,...,φ∘un)(h, \varphi \circ u_1, . . . , \varphi \circ u_n) is adapted to b\boldsymbol{b}. Let ω′\omega ' denote the associated differential form. Let μ\mu denote Lebesgue measure on Cn\mathbf{C}^n. Let f∈O(U;A)f\in \mathscr{O}(U; A). Let us write ψ⋅μ\psi \cdot \mu for the vector measure associated with the differential form fωf \omega. The vector measure associated with the differential form

(φ∘f)ω′=(φ∘f)d(φ∘u1)∧dz1∧⋯∧d(φ∘un)∧dzn (\varphi \circ f)\omega '= (\varphi \circ f)d(\varphi \circ u_1)\wedge dz_1\wedge \cdots \wedge d(\varphi \circ u_n)\wedge dz_n

is equal to (φ∘ψ)⋅μ(\varphi \circ \psi )\cdot \mu. Therefore, by formula (5), and INT, VI, §2, no2^o2, prop. 2, one has

Θb(φ∘f)=(2iπn\Theta_{\boldsymbol{b}}(\varphi \circ f) =(2i\pi n!)n∫U(φ∘f)μ=(2niπ)^n\int_U(\varphi \circ f)\mu=(2ni\pi!)nφ(∫Uψμ)=φ(Θa(f)))^n\varphi (\int_U\psi \mu)=\varphi (\Theta_{\boldsymbol{a}}(f)),

as was required.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5-mini, gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.