Bourbaki

Exercise 6, Appendix 0

Tag 03H2, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03H2].

Theory of Sets, I, 61

A relation in a theory T\mathscr{T} is said to be logically irreducible if it begins with a relational sign. Let R1R_1, R2R_2, ..., RnR_n be distinct logically irreducible relations in T\mathscr{T}. A logical construction with base R1R_1, R2R_2, ..., RnR_n is any sequence A1A_1, A2A_2, ..., ApA_p of assemblies in T\mathscr{T} such that each AiA_i satisfies one of the following conditions : (1) AiA_i is one of the relations R1R_1, R2R_2, ..., RnR_n; (2) there exists an assembly AjA_j preceding AiA_i such that AiA_i is ¬Aj\neg A_j; (3) there exist two assemblies AjA_j and AkA_k preceding AiA_i such that ∨Ai\vee A_i is AjAkA_j A_k.

(a) Show that the assemblies in a logical construction with base

R1,  R2,  …,  RnR_1, \; R_2, \; \ldots, \; R_n

are relations in T\mathscr{T}. A relation which appears in such a logical construction is said to be logically constructed from R1R_1, R2R_2, ..., RnR_n.

(b) If RR and SS are logically constructed from R1R_1, R2R_2, ..., RnR_n, then so are ¬R\neg R, ∨RS\vee RS, ⇒RS\Rightarrow RS, "RR and SS", R⇔SR \Leftrightarrow S.

(c) Let RR be a relation in T\mathscr{T}. Consider the sequence of relations defined as follows. First of all, write RR. If RR is logically irreducible, stop there. If not, write next the assembly or assemblies antecedent to RR (which are well determined relations). Then write the assembly or assemblies antecedent to those of the preceding assemblies which are not logically irreducible; and so on. Let R1R_1, R2R_2, ..., RnR_n be the distinct logically irreducible relations which arise from this construction; they are called the logical components of RR. Show that RR is logically constructed from its logical components, but that if one of the relations of the sequence

R1,R2,…,RnR_1, R_2, \ldots, R_n is omitted, then RR is not logically constructed from the remaining (n−1)(n-1) relations.

(d) Let RR be a relation and let R1,R2,…,RnR_1, R_2, \ldots, R_n be distinct logically irreducible relations such that (1) RR is logically constructed from R1,R2,…,RnR_1, R_2, \ldots, R_n, (2) if we omit one relation from the sequence R1,R2,…,RnR_1, R_2, \ldots, R_n, then RR is not logically constructed from the remaining relations. Show that R1,R2,…,RnR_1, R_2, \ldots, R_n are the logical components of RR.

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.