Let (Xι)ι∈I and (Yϰ)ϰ∈K be two families of sets with non-empty index sets I, K. Then
(ι∈I⋂Xι)∪(ϰ∈K⋂Yϰ)=(ι,ϰ)∈I×K⋂(Xι∪Yϰ),
(ι∈I⋃Xι)∩(ϰ∈K⋃Yϰ)=(ι,ϰ)∈I×K⋃(Xι∩Yϰ).
Let α, β be two distinct objects; apply the formulae of Proposition 8 (with L={α, β}, Jα=I, Jβ=K) to the family ((Zλ,μ)μ∈Jλ)λ∈L, where Zα,ι=Xι for all ι∈I and Zβ,ϰ=Yϰ for each ϰ∈K. By the existence of the canonical bijection of ∐λ∈LJλ onto I×K (no. 3) and by Proposition 1 of § 4 we obtain the formulae stated.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.