Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 03QP, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03QP].

Theory of Sets, chapter III, § 2. Well-ordered sets

The set E\* of segments of a well-ordered set E is well-ordered by inclusion. The mapping x→Sxx \rightarrow \mathrm{S}_x is an isomorphism of the well-ordered set E onto the set of segments of E other than E itself.

It is clear that if x∈Ex \in \mathrm{E} and y∈Ey \in \mathrm{E}, the relation x⩽yx \leqslant y implies Sx⊂Sy\mathrm{S}_x \subset \mathrm{S}_y, and that x<yx < y implies Sx≠Sy\mathrm{S}_x \neq \mathrm{S}_y; the mapping x→Sxx \rightarrow \mathrm{S}_x is therefore an isomorphism of E onto the set S(E) of segments of E distinct from E itself (§ 1, no. 12, Proposition 11), and consequently S(E) is well-ordered. Moreover, E\* is isomorphic to the well-ordered set obtained from S(E) by adjoining a greatest element.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2004, Springer. Not translated.