Let (Eα,fαβ) and (Eα′,fαβ′) be two inverse systems of sets relative toI, and let uα be a mapping of Eα into Eα′ for each α∈I, such that the uα form an inverse system of mappings. Let u=←limuα. Then for each x′=(xα′)∈E′=←limEα′, the uˉα−1(xα′) form an inverse system of subsets of the Eα, and uˉ−1(x′)=←limuˉα−1(xα′).
For if α⩽β and xβ∈uβ−1(xβ′), we have
uα(fαβ(xβ))=fαβ′(uβ(xβ))=fαβ′(xβ′)=xα′,
from which the first assertion follows; and to say that x=(xα)∈E=limEα is such that u(x)=x′ means, by definition, that uα(xα)=xα′ for each α∈I.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.