Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 03RP, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03RP].

Theory of Sets, chapter III, § 7. Inverse limits and direct limits

Let (Eα,fαβ)(E_\alpha,f_{\alpha\beta}) and (Eα′,fαβ′)(E'_\alpha,f'_{\alpha\beta}) be two inverse systems of sets relative to II, and let uαu_\alpha be a mapping of EαE_\alpha into Eα′E'_\alpha for each α∈I\alpha\in I, such that the uαu_\alpha form an inverse system of mappings. Let u=lim⁡← uαu=\underset{\leftarrow}{\lim}\,u_\alpha. Then for each x′=(xα′)∈E′=lim⁡← Eα′x'=(x'_\alpha)\in E'=\underset{\leftarrow}{\lim}\,E'_\alpha, the uˉα−1(xα′)\bar u_\alpha^{-1}(x'_\alpha) form an inverse system of subsets of the EαE_\alpha, and uˉ−1(x′)=lim⁡← uˉα−1(xα′)\bar u^{-1}(x')=\underset{\leftarrow}{\lim}\,\bar u_\alpha^{-1}(x'_\alpha).

For if α⩽β\alpha \leqslant \beta and xβ∈uβ−1(xβ′)x_\beta \in \overset{-1}{u_\beta}(x'_\beta), we have

uα(fαβ(xβ))=fαβ′(uβ(xβ))=fαβ′(xβ′)=xα′,u_\alpha(f_{\alpha\beta}(x_\beta)) = f'_{\alpha\beta}(u_\beta(x_\beta)) = f'_{\alpha\beta}(x'_\beta) = x'_\alpha,

from which the first assertion follows; and to say that x=(xα)∈E=lim←⁡Eαx = (x_\alpha) \in \mathrm{E} = \varprojlim \mathrm{E}_\alpha is such that u(x)=x′u(x) = x' means, by definition, that uα(xα)=xα′u_\alpha(x_\alpha) = x'_\alpha for each α∈I\alpha \in \mathrm{I}.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2004, Springer. Not translated.